Latest WikiLeaks release[W:81]

Imnukingfutz said:

WikiLeaks says CIA disguised hacking as Russian activity* | Daily Mail Online

Interesting article. Many have said that the leaks before the election were from the inside. Blaming it on those ole nasty Rusky's is a way for the DNC to deflect from what was in those leaks. Now WIKI releases source code showing how the CIA can make computer intrusions (hacks) seem like they come from anywhere.

Computers are a wonderful thing but can really be a cloak to mischievous and nefarious happenings.

Click to expand...

Imnukingfutz said:

WikiLeaks says CIA disguised hacking as Russian activity* | Daily Mail Online

Interesting article. Many have said that the leaks before the election were from the inside. Blaming it on those ole nasty Rusky's is a way for the DNC to deflect from what was in those leaks. Now WIKI releases source code showing how the CIA can make computer intrusions (hacks) seem like they come from anywhere.

Computers are a wonderful thing but can really be a cloak to mischievous and nefarious happenings.

Click to expand...

Tigerace117 said:

Wikileaks has lost all credibility by now. Frankly speaking, they'd shown their true colors a long time ago. I'd take this with a great deal of skepticism.

Click to expand...

Tigerace117 said:

Wikileaks has lost all credibility by now. Frankly speaking, they'd shown their true colors a long time ago. I'd take this with a great deal of skepticism.

Click to expand...

Thoreau72 said:

WikiLeaks has more credibility in one keystroke than the mainstream media and government spokespersons have in 10 pages of documents.

It is easy to understand however, that a high school student's young age would prevent him from understanding that.

Click to expand...

Tigerace117 said:

It's laughable that somebody who thinks the Twin Towers were nuked is trying to lecture anybody else on credibility.

People like you are Wikileaks' target audience: anti American, arrogant and gullible as hell.

Click to expand...

Captain America said:

That's what a smart person would do.

And yet, anyone wanting to believe it might respond, "I guess that settles any questions on the current Russian hacking brouhaha."

People believe what they WANT to believe. Mushrooms indeed.

Click to expand...

Thoreau72 said:

That I am not as gullible as you is what gets your goat. :lol:

Click to expand...

Tigerace117 said:

Oh, no. You are far more gullible than I am. Anybody who actually thinks the Twin Towers were nuked automatically falls well into that category.

Click to expand...

DaveFagan said:

I guess that settles any questions on the current Russian hacking brouhaha. It's all horse crap being fed to us mushrooms. A much closer investigation here at home of our Intelligence Agencies would be more sensible. When they lie to our Congressional Representatives with impunity, it's a certain sign they have too much power and are not trustworthy.
//

Click to expand...

Tigerace117 said:

True true. A certain subset of the population is desperate to believe that the Russians weren't involved, despite increasing evidence to the contrary.

And it's really very telling how much time and effort Wikileaks spends trying to "expose" the US government, and conversely how little time and effort they've put into "investigating" countries like Russia and China--- who are rather consistently shifty in their treatment of both their own people and other people.

Click to expand...

Thoreau72 said:

No, you have it backwards Ace. The gullible man is the one who believes the statements of known liars without question.

His opposite is the man who is most skeptical of the statements of known liars.

They probably don't teach that in your high school.

Click to expand...

Harry Guerrilla said:

Wikileaks releases information that is given to them and they're a Western oriented organization, with largely native English speakers.
How could Wikileaks release information on Russia and China, when it is not given to them?

Click to expand...

Captain America said:

That's what a smart person would do.

And yet, anyone wanting to believe it might respond, "I guess that settles any questions on the current Russian hacking brouhaha."

People believe what they WANT to believe. Mushrooms indeed.

Click to expand...

Tigerace117 said:

Yes, known liars like Alex Jones and other conspitards? Those known liars? Exactly right. Glad to see you've finally admitted you are wrong T-72.

Seems to me you've finally awoken from your stupor of gullibility T-72.

And frankly speaking you wouldn't make it in my high school.

Click to expand...

Tigerace117 said:

Yes, known liars like Alex Jones and other conspitards? Those known liars? Exactly right. Glad to see you've finally admitted you are wrong T-72.

Seems to me you've finally awoken from your stupor of gullibility T-72.

And frankly speaking you wouldn't make it in my high school.

Click to expand...

PirateMk1 said:

Here's my question to you. How much does Wikileaks get wrong? So far as I can tell far less than our own intelligence agencies. That alone tells me we have a problem, because the reverse should be true or at the very least the truthfulness and accuracy ought to be comparable. Its not. Our own government agency is less than truthful and even less accurate, while Wikileaks is not perfect they are much more often than not truthful and accurate. That tells me I should at least consider what they have to say.

Click to expand...

jmotivator said:

Do you have any evidence that these documents are fake? Do you have evidence that any documents released by Wikileaks have been fakes?

Click to expand...

Tigerace117 said:

Well, considering that they are being given the government's own files......that statement seems rather self contradictory. Seeing as Wikileaks is, you know, leaking government files, how can they can get more right than the government?

Wikileaks has an agenda. A pretty blatant one at this point. And just like any other partisan source, you have to take what they say with a large degree of skepticism.

Click to expand...

Harry Guerrilla said:

Their agenda has always been "We open governments."
That should be fairly obvious because it's their moto.

Click to expand...

Tigerace117 said:

Do you have any reason why we should believe this particular group of partisan hacks over any other group of partisan hacks?

Click to expand...