• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lara Trump calls on Americans at border to 'arm up and get guns and be ready'

gbg3 said:
The safety and security of the citizens is one thing a federal government typically provides and cares very much about. Not this administration. They've willingly invited (and allow to continue) this unbelievable chaos at the border and the citizens who live near there, are left on their own to provide their own protection. What those residents are facing is a daily invasion of illegals from countries all over the world with no one but themselves to protect their families from all the very dangerous criminals among the hundreds of thousands freely crossing. They have been given no choice whatsoever but to take matters into their own hands.
Click to expand...
and yet you guys deny climate change which we consider all about safety and security.
 
Hamish Howl said:
That's because you refuse to read Lara Trump's entire quote.
Click to expand...
I’m reading the title of the thread for sure. Tell ya what. I’ll read the whole article if you read the linked citation regarding insurrection that @trixare4kids gave. After you read it than tell me with a straight face again “Not yet, but I know what I saw.”
 
Overitall said:
Hmm . . . . I’m not seeing where anyone is suggesting that.
Click to expand...

When a man picks up a gun, loads it and says he is going to "take matters into his own hands" and walks out the door, we all know what he means. Someone is going to die. When someone exhorts others to take up arms and "take matters into their own hands", implying they are going to perform the duties of law enforcement personnel who are not doing their jobs, against mostly if not entirely-unarmed migrants, then unless they make it crystal clear what the intended by their statement, mass-murder is a perfectly reasonable presumption.
 
Last edited:
Overitall said:
I’m reading the title of the thread for sure. Tell ya what. I’ll read the whole article if you read the linked citation regarding insurrection that @trixare4kids gave. After you read it than tell me with a straight face again “Not yet, but I know what I saw.”
Click to expand...

Again, I'm sorry you hate the republic and the constitution, and want it overthrown by dumbass hayseeds.
 
Felis Leo said:
When a man picks up a gun, loads it and says he is going to "take matters into his own hands" and walks out the door, we all know what he means. Someone is going to die. When someone calls exhorts others to take up arms and "take matters into their own hands", implying they are going to perform the duties of law enforcement personnel who are not doing their jobs, against mostly if not entirely-unarmed migrants, then unless they make it crystal clear what the intended by their statement, mass-murder is a perfectly reasonable assumption.
Click to expand...
I would not advocate for shooting unarmed, non-threatening people. Did she actually say that?
 
trixare4kids said:
Of course I do. I also get to talk about your complete dishonesty.... You don't speak for honest people.
Click to expand...

Yeah? Tell me my motivations again. You know, the ones you just made up?
 
CLAX1911 said:
Immigration law is what it is, if you want to talk about changing it that's fine. But it isn't my sight, it's the sight of law.
Click to expand...
Well, that's off topic with what we were discussing. Just for referencing, when stating "the line of sight" while discussing firing weapons, that means aiming the gun barrel at the direction of the intended target.

CLAX1911 said:
A better idea is only fire a gun if you need to stop an attacker.
Click to expand...
That would be an excellent suggestion directed to Moderate Right. Post #89.

CLAX1911 said:
I've never heard of Sunbury being killed that way but a neighbor of mine had his windshield broken from falling bullets and I have seen slugs around.
Click to expand...
Yeah, like bottle rockets fired up in the air, they will find their way back to the ground. Bullets same thing. That's why it's best to fire a weapon in the air in a remote area - like somewhere near the Southern border. That's my suggestion to people who are armed and ready to shoot, when they have sighted brown skinned humans. Don't spray rounds in their direction!!!! Don't take aim at them and fire!!! Don't take matters into you're own hands!!! Another words, don't listen to dumbass Lara Trump!!!!
 
Hamish Howl said:
Yeah? Tell me my motivations again. You know, the ones you just made up?
Click to expand...

You not only attempted to mangle my words with your intellectual dishonesty schtick, but now you are mangling @Overitalls posts.

My job is to point it out... so maybe you'll do better.
Don't like it? Do better. :)
 
Raising Trump’s support to a fever pitch among his deplorable base. We know what happened last time he did that.
 
Subieguy said:
and yet you guys deny climate change which we consider all about safety and security.
Click to expand...
It's not that we deny climate change it's that we deny the alarmism. There were supposed to be 4 or 5 points of no return all in the passed now.

It's the failed prophecy we deny. The climate changes there was an ice age once.
 
Overitall said:
Tbh, I didn’t fully digest the article to determine it but just on the surface I didn’t take it that way. But then I don’t consider myself a nutcase either. ;)
Click to expand...

So if someone said "I hope nothing really bad happens at the next Trump rally," you would assume that they said this with the best of intentions?
 
Overitall said:
It’s not only the most common way but the one most people associate with the word. You’re being a bit nit picky. :p

I didn’t read anywhere that Lara told anyone to hunt down and kill immigrants. Did you?
Click to expand...
No, he's not. You're the one that asserted "lynching requires a rope." He just wanted to teach you something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom