- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,009
- Reaction score
- 33,944
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
the past three presidents have admitted drug use.We could revisit Hillary's past financial dealings and Obama's admitted drug use. Perry would certainly be better than whatever the Demos have to offer, and his experience shows it.
The thought of having competent leadership in the WH seems to make the leftists nervous.
How do you figure?
We could revisit Hillary's past financial dealings and Obama's admitted drug use. Perry would certainly be better than whatever the Demos have to offer, and his experience shows it.
The thought of having competent leadership in the WH seems to make the leftists nervous.
Not just better than the terrorists, but much, much better.
Clinton, of course a liar, said he did not inhale. I've only heard accusations against George Bush, and although Obama has admitted to using pot and coke the rumor that he dealt in it has never been proven.the past three presidents have admitted drug use.
I disagree. He has a very good record in Texas and is a proven leader. If he is defeated it will be by party politic only and not the quality and experience of the candidate.and the Democrats would really have to screw up badly in their choice of candidate and in the election for Perry to be electable.
Perry, Jindal maybe, Christie may come back, Romney also. I don't believe Cruz has enough experience, and the same with Rubio. There are others who may make a move and, apparently, some proven leaders. I'd like to see Trey Gowdy in the DOJ and Paul Ryan playing a major role in Finance.Who do you think should run?
And just as depraved if you adopt their strategies.
Hey W... do you recall the Houston dentist who had a son stuck in a Nuevo Laerdo jail ? Couldn't get him freed. sent some Texan's across the border who busted him out of jail and took him home to Houston. It took a while to discover who did the deed. The U.S refused to extradite.
I've always said if a tough job needs doing .. call a Texan; That might be what it will take in this case.
Wasn't born in Texas but sometimes I get a case of 'The London Homesick Blues'
Thom Paine
Corruption about a possible Presidential candidate was mentioned so naturally Hillary Clinton's name springs to mind. Drug use was also mentioned so naturally Obama's name came up.You're like Pavlov's dog. I mention any republican and you salivate the word Hillary. Ruff, ruff.
Clinton, of course a liar, said he did not inhale. I've only heard accusations against George Bush, and although Obama has admitted to using pot and coke the rumor that he dealt in it has never been proven.
Later, an aide clarified the remarks, saying Bush has not used illegal drugs in at least the last 25 years.
"I've told the American people that years ago I made some mistakes. I've learned from my mistakes and should I be fortunate enough to become president I will bring dignity and honor to the office," said Bush -- his consistent response to repeated questions about whether he ever used illegal drugs.
Bush has been more specific on other mistakes from his past. For example, he has admitted to past drinking problems.
I disagree. He has a very good record in Texas and is a proven leader. If he is defeated it will be by party politic only and not the quality and experience of the candidate.
Perry, Jindal maybe, Christie may come back, Romney also. I don't believe Cruz has enough experience, and the same with Rubio. There are others who may make a move and, apparently, some proven leaders. I'd like to see Trey Gowdy in the DOJ and Paul Ryan playing a major role in Finance.
I would hope that whoever the Democrats nominate has a successful history in governing, as we can see the problems inexperience causes. Hillary Clinton would be a similar disaster so I'm hoping that the best person wins, not necessarily whoever ran the slickest campaign or who the MSM supports. Maybe the voters learned a lesson from their experience with Barrack Obama.
What about you?
You ask some of the most ignorant questions on the forum. I'll let you figure it out.
Questions regarding your moronic statements'?
I love your avatar. It really highlights the amount of uninhabited land in this country.
I love it too. It really highlights were the pockets of parasites and socialist live, doesn't it.
I love how they've convinced themselves that everyone collecting welfare is a Democrat.
And that is part of the problem. It seems the electorate has become so involved in the showbiz of the campaign that we tend to ignore the candidates record and experience. It is a vote for the best campaigner, and often the freebies they promise, more than who would make the best President of the United States. This leaves room for charlatans with no real record of accomplishment to simply tell the people what they want to hear rather than pointing to their accomplishments and credibility.Based on his performance during the last campaign, he doesn't look electable to me, not unless the Democrats really screw up.
I think Perry is very electable after four years, Romney is 60-40 to run, 'bridgegate' was terribly over-hyped and should be ignored though Christie might lose for other reasons,, and Huntsman should seek the Democrat nomination. I like Jingal too but he doesn't have enough national exposure and, dare I say, certainly lacks in charisma. Ron Paul will go nowhere and Paul Ryan should wait.I don't believe Perry is electable. Christie has a long way to overcome "bridgegate." Romney isn't going to run, and has said so more than once. We had our chance back in '12. Jindal is a possibility. I'd like to see Huntsman give it another go.
I get that feeling as well.I suspect the final Republican candidate will be someone not currently on the radar.
As with me that leaves a lot of room, but I don't believe Hillary can win.The final Democrat candidate will either be Hillary or someone not currently on the radar.
Oh, you bet!! The country , and the world, is desperate for good (and hope Great) leadership. That's why I discount Hillary.Let's hope that whoever does finally win the WH has successful governing experience this time around.
I love how they've convinced themselves that everyone collecting welfare is a Democrat.
Who said anything about Democrats?
And that is part of the problem. It seems the electorate has become so involved in the showbiz of the campaign that we tend to ignore the candidates record and experience. It is a vote for the best campaigner, and often the freebies they promise, more than who would make the best President of the United States. This leaves room for charlatans with no real record of accomplishment to simply tell the people what they want to hear rather than pointing to their accomplishments and credibility.
I think Perry is very electable after four years, Romney is 60-40 to run, 'bridgegate' was terribly over-hyped and should be ignored though Christie might lose for other reasons,, and Huntsman should seek the Democrat nomination. I like Jingal too but he doesn't have enough national exposure and, dare I say, certainly lacks in charisma. Ron Paul will go nowhere and Paul Ryan should wait.
I get that feeling as well. As with me that leaves a lot of room, but I don't believe Hillary can win.
Oh, you bet!! The country , and the world, is desperate for good (and hope Great) leadership. That's why I discount Hillary.
:roll:
It's the 9/11-type paranoia starting up all over again.
Next, we will be seeing ISIS sighting's on every street corner, at every gas station.
America...grow a spine.
My biggest fear is that the threat of terrorism will fundamentally change America not from the terrorists attacks but from our own government. Another major attack on US soil and I could see Partiot Act II being put into place further eroding citizen privacy and granting more unenumerated powers to our government. There may come a point where our own government is much more of a threat to your average citizen than ISIS or another terrorist group ever will be.
I understand, we see things much differently.
No need to be mysterious. Use your words.
If I used them the way I would like to I would be infracted. I chose to remain civil.
That is exactly what I am afraid of as well.
The paranoia after 9/11 that allowed the government to become ridiculously controlling truly disgusted me.
Another 9/11-style attack and I fear American's rights/freedoms will be restricted to a truly scary extent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?