LAPD ends its protection of Kamala Harris after backlash

[dcsports]

I made no comment about your phony article's news outlet. I have no questions for you. Thx.

Sure you did. Why do you think all these outlets are reporting the same 'phony' story?

 

[jaypatriot]

I am agreeing with you.

Just saying that Trump doesn't merit any extra protection beyond the detail all ex-presidents receive.

I mean, assuming he doesn't drop over dead before it becomes relevant.

And I am agreeing with you.
He doesn't deserve more than what the law requires as president and as an ex-president which I hope happens on January 20, 2029.

 

[tshade]

OK. Happy to discuss the topic when you are ready.

ok--ready. Give me a specific question.

 

[snakestretcher]

Ummm, it strikes me the people doing the attempted assassinations lately aren't MAGA. The people doing the killing seem to be mentally incompetent liberals.

Which ones; name these 'liberals', and I'll counter that with a conspiracy theorist who thinks vaccines kill people-RFK Jr.. How does it also feel having elected a mentally deficient and incompetent geriatric loser to your presidency?

 

[Raven484]

Had you read your own phony article you wouldn't have bother posting it.

LAPD has ended its role in Kamala Harris' security detail. What happens now?

Your morning catch-up: LAPD responds to internal criticism by stopping its security detail of Kamala Harris, Chief Jim McDonnell is grilled over three officer shootings, and more big stories.

www.latimes.com

LAPD no longer providing protection for Kamala Harris after backlash: report

The Los Angeles Police Department has pulled its officers from a security detail at the Brentwood home of Kamala Harris after backlash from the public that crime suppression units were being diverted to instead guard the former VP.

www.foxla.com

LAPD ends protection for ex-VP Harris days after President Trump revoked Secret Service detail

The LAPD will no longer provide security protection for Kamala Harris in a reversal just days after President Trump revoked Secret Service protection.

www.nbclosangeles.com

L.A.P.D. Stops Security Services for Kamala Harris

The department had assigned officers to protect the former vice president after her Secret Service detail was terminated. Some criticized the use of the officers.

www.nytimes.com

MSN

LAPD stops providing protection for Kamala Harris days after Trump rescinded Secret Service

LAPD stopped providing special protection for former VP Kamala Harris days after the Brentwood resident had her Secret Service protection rescinded by Donald Trump.

abc7.com

Sorry if I repeated any. But if this is fake, these outlets definitely didn't do their homework.
And if it is fake, was Trump actually right when he said they are all fake news?

 

[The Brad Dad]

And if it is fake, was Trump actually right when he said they are all fake news?

The original post contained a news story that linked to zero sources save for some maga idiot babbling about Harris's failed potus run. None of these stories feature any comments from dept officials that tI've seen, and the "backlash" is, again, contained to a single quote.

Trump is quite right that they're all fake news now that they've paid him off and accepted their role as state propaganda.

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

MAGAs: "Do your own research. You libbies just lap up articles without ever even checking FACTS, snark snark."

Also MAGAs:

I linked to the article. It does say what's written, in the first sentence.

I'm not going to check all the links in the artice/website itself.

LOLz

News articles often link to other articles, or even past articles on a topic. Is there a specific one you have questions about? Vague statements of 'check your links!' is not helpful.


It's a news article. Are you fussing about the source? Or is something inaccurate? Not clear what your concern is. As noted above, you can look for other articles yourself - i just linked several above.

 

[dcsports]

MAGAs: "Do your own research. You libbies just lap up articles without ever even checking FACTS, snark snark."

Also MAGAs:



LOLz

So just dropping a snarky comment?

Do you read every link from every article here? Keep in mind that I was responding to a few people who didn't actually read it. The one in question was asking 'where did the article say that LAPD pulled protection' - which was in the very first sentence of the article.

 

[dcsports]

The original post contained a news story that linked to zero sources save for some maga idiot babbling about Harris's failed potus run. None of these stories feature any comments from dept officials that tI've seen, and the "backlash" is, again, contained to a single quote.

Trump is quite right that they're all fake news now that they've paid him off and accepted their role as state propaganda.

Your complaint for pages and pages was that the article didn't say what it did... in the very first sentence. Now it's that none of the many articles provided have comments from department officials. Seriously? lol.

 

[dcsports]

ok--ready. Give me a specific question.

You were the one who commented.

 

[The Brad Dad]

Your complaint for pages and pages was that the article didn't say what it did... in the very first sentence. Now it's that none of the many articles provided have comments from department officials. Seriously? lol.

You didn't even read the one article you submitted to start the thread. Who cares about anything else you'd provide after?

 

[dcsports]

You didn't even read the one article you submitted to start the thread. Who cares about anything else you'd provide after?

Again, I read it - and others on the topic. You didn't. You just complained for 5 pages that it didn't say what it said in the first sentence. I suspect you didn't read it, and didn't understand how the article linked past articles related to it, clicked into one of those, and are still trying to save face.