• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Labor Unions Join Wall Street Occupiers for "Mass Rally'

Ok, but my point is that speculation is a business forecasting tool that without, many could not accurately do the jobs that they do, hence they would have to hedge their costs themselves, increasing pricing to the consumer.
j-mac

Mostly BS
increasing pricing to the consumer
as I said a certain amount of speculation is good for the market, after that it's nothing more then thievery
 
Ok, but my point is that speculation is a business forecasting tool that without, many could not accurately do the jobs that they do, hence they would have to hedge their costs themselves, increasing pricing to the consumer.

j-mac

I never said that all speculation is bad, what I did say is that when speculation is sucking the blood out of our economy it's time to identify the problem and put regulations in place to keep it in check

 
:shrug: you can argue about their relative importance all day long. that's what he was trying to address.

And I'm saying he's being dishonest.




It doesn't change the fact what you claimed is completely false. The report states that: [we] provided nearly 11.4 million medical services for three million people

Assume the 332,278 abortions were done for individuals who get however many procedures you want, they are still only 11% of the people served. Far from the "overwhelming majority" you claimed. Unless you want to claim that each abortion can be done on more than 1 individual.
 
Are you seriously suggesting that Libbos don't refer to their opponents as racists/bigots/homophobes at every oppurtune moment? I think we call know that's a totally infantile claim you're making, there.


You used the word "you" when referring to the haymarket's post. So now you are moving away from your claim?

I keep asking for evidence of who these "libbos" or "those who lean a bit left" who say all these things as has been claimed, from Thrilla and another poster, but still no evidence has been forthcoming. The infantile claim is from those who make the claim but can't back it up.
 
He wants to generate massive social change...much like the one term Marxist president Obama. When a leftist says those things what do you think he means?
 
Last edited:

Two choices...you ARE that stupid to believe this is about left vs right, or you are such an enmeshed partisan hack that it is all you know how to and what to say. The right. Huh...what political lean are 7 of the top 10 wealthiest congressmen? Do you think Obama has a history of being in bed with the banks and Wall Street? Do you think ALL politicians have a history of being in bed with banks and corporations? Oh no...its...'the right'. How about the media...throw out Fox News...who owns NBC? And who has GE been most cozy with? Of course...no dems are involved in the banking bailouts or the Sally and Freddie crisis. The richest of the rich...the Oprahs, the Buffets, Gates, the parade of liberal elites...they are all 'The Right' huh?

What concerns me? Some people are stupid enough to just follow along and nod their head. Greater concern? Some are stupid enough to actually believe this is a left vs right issue. I know their are plenty of partisan whores that are going to try very hard to continue to make this a left vs right issue.

The wealthy...the left and right...the markets and the banks...what would happen if they just shut down for a month? What would happen if the wealthy just pulled ALL of their investment capital? What would happen to the average middle income Americans retirement accounts? What would happen to the job markets? What would happen to student loans, home loans, small business loans?

The people being protested against...if they were smart? They would very publicly give these assclowns everything they want. Pull ALL their money out of the markets...stick them in secure overseas markets. They should very much point out why...hey...just giving the unwashed masses what they want. Careful what you wish for.
 
Last edited:

actually, no, it wouldn't.

many of us appreciate that he is not a self serving rich bastard

then you should look askance at his insistence that the government bail out banks that he is invested in (the name "Goldman Sachs" sound familiar? I believe there is currently some kind of protest going on loosely connected to the issue), hiding his money in trusts to avoid taxation, and selling of financial insurance products whose worth goes up if tax rates do.

Buffet isn't an idiot - he has made sure that he won't lose out if tax rates go up - the man actually makes a profit if they do.




yeesh. it's T Boone Pickens all over again :roll:
 
If that is the latest right wing meme, it reveals they are terrified of this entire movement - only really in its beginning stages.

yup. if there is one thing that will definitely pluck at the heart strings and speak deeply to the American people, it's invading the Smithsonian Museum and pooping on cop cars.
 

Is this what the protesters have been asking for? Source for this claim?
 

Can you say "Kill the goose"? Certain people aren't going to be happy unless the expand misery as far and wide as possible. To them there are just some people too lucky and way to happy.
 
Can you say "Kill the goose"? Certain people aren't going to be happy unless the expand misery as far and wide as possible. To them there are just some people too lucky and way to happy.

I've thought about that too... is this the 1% of 1% of the socialist / Marxists wannabes joined by Unions to simply make everyone as miserable and idiotic as they are or is this a real movement with a point? So far, the jury is out on that one.
 
If people were to become socialist simply to make people miserable, then fundamentally they would have to accept a point of view that is not socialist since they would be trying to spread misery by using socialism (which they would have to view as negative). This is just plain absurd to think people would want to do this.

More likely, they believe that their way is the way to the greater good.
 

nope. screw everyone equally - if you fail, it's no ones' fault or responsibility but your own.

No Bailouts. For corporate or union bigwigs alike.




as for "the system" breaking in the 80s - no "system" broke. The American People got stupid. we went from a 10% savings rate to a negative savings rate in that time period - because we got stupid (and shortsighted). as for the "no gains for those below" - again, that's on you. I work hard, educate myself on the side, and come from little enough - and I will likely retire a multimillionaire; and be making above the median wage before I'm 35.

:roll: the boomers spent their high-earning years taking out loans on their McMansions that they bought with adjustable rate mortgages in order to buy the latest plasma or take an extra vacation, and now they want to blame their problems on "the system". :roll:
 

I think you are assuming they give a crap about the greater good. in the meantime, i can alleviate my misery by taking from others.

There is nothing new under the sun.
 
Is this what the protesters have been asking for? Source for this claim?

You're damned right they are, and more.

Here they are from their own website....


Quite the list of Marx laden, BS is it not?

j-mac
 
as I recall, mortgage debt is about the size of the US economy.

so....these people are basically saying go back to subsistence farming, but at the same time insisting that subsistence farming will make us all fabulously wealthy...

i wonder if the "no debt" idea is just a spin-off of the no-student-debt driver, or everyone remembering how, like, totally awesome, like, that movie was, with Brad Pitt, and stuff.
 
Last edited:
I've thought about that too... is this the 1% of 1% of the socialist / Marxists wannabes joined by Unions to simply make everyone as miserable and idiotic as they are or is this a real movement with a point? So far, the jury is out on that one.

First, I have to amend my previous statement by injecting "... joined by Union support", not the Unions. I've actually seen very little AFL-CIO or SEIU members participation. The Unions are at least lending some support via PR releases, I haven't really seen much actual participation by millions of the memberships.


I would tend to agree, therefore the premise that socialism = misery is probably not a conscious thought or effort, those who are pushing that point of view must therefore believe that the socialist changes they are calling for are actually GOOD.

More likely, they believe that their way is the way to the greater good.
They probably believe a lot of things... in actuality we don't really know what they believe as there isn't a coherent or cohesive view. I've found the following sites with all sorts of things from demands to "calls to action".


1.) Occupy Wall Street
A Modest Call to Action on this September 17th | OccupyWallSt.org


2.) AFL-CIO Statement
Statement by AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka On Occupy Wall Street



3.) Occupy Wall Street (un-official demands)

Proposed List Of Demands For Occupy Wall St Movement! | OccupyWallSt.org Forum


4.) Occupy Wall Street (official demands)
Occupy Wall Street - Official Demands - coupmedia.org


Lots of these things can be claimed as "for the common good", I'm sure there are extremists who would, given the chance, change our religions, our political systems, our outlooks, our freedoms (or lack thereof) all for what THEY consider "the common good".
 
 
GOT STUPID? Maybe their was a stupid virus going around
It's a colorful euphemism to describe the malaise of our society and forgetting what is fiscally important both as a nation and individually.



Just a question please don't be upset, Have you ever considered anger management?
Just my 2 cents but he doesn't seem particularly angry - it may be that your perception is being modified by the written word and the in formalness of a political forum posting.

Your parents are they boomers? Where you picked on in school? Like I said I am just trying to under stand your apparent hatred. Relax sit back and take a few deep breaths
Again... you're interpretation seems lost in translation.
 
Last edited:
GOT STUPID? Maybe their was a stupid virus going around

no; just a generation of people taking the reins who had decided to buy into instant gratification as a personal, governing, and financial philosophy.

Do you think you may be sterotyping just a little, btw what age brackett do you consider boomers in?

Boomers started roughly in 1945, and continued roughly getting born into the early 60's. IOW, the demographic who just wasted their peak earning years, and has very little saved for retirement, but is about to destroy the entitlement system designed to be a safety net for such scenarios.


hatred? nah, my hatred is reserved for those who specifically rate it. I just don't respect the boomers very much - they took a great thing and have generally F*&('d up everything they touched. my folks are boomers - and are smarter than most of the rest of their generation. never divorced, lived beneath their means, and taught me to do likewise.
 
After reading the various threads on this same subject here, and paying special attention to the vitriolic responses from those on the right side of the political spectrum, two dominant themes appear

1) this is a new and different type of protest that seems to defy leadership, a core goal, and adopts methods and tactics far different than many others we are use to seeing. Because of that his confuses many and even angers them since it is the 'shock of the new' and it bewilders and confuses them..... and they don't like that one bit.

2) The intensity and anger that so many right wing posters have displayed obsessing over these rather minor events is entirely due to their adoration of capitalism and the corporatists who control Wall Street and our economic system and the threat they perceive from a bunch of unwashed modern hippies carrying around Mao's little red book, the bio of Leon Trotsky and a bomb making manual from August Spies.. or so they would have us believe. They see their meal ticket threatened and - for the first time in a longtime - see protest against what they hold dear. Many on the right are simply sycophants of corporatism and the wealthy and they will do their best to defend their masters as a way of self protection. It is the first instinct of any organism to protect itself and the toadies of capitalism are responding in knee jerk fashion.
 
I think their focus is so broad as to have no focus at all beyond disruption.

Personally, I think they should all focus on Big Bank Foreclosure Procedures. People lose their homes for various reasons. They may have lost their jobs; maybe their interest rate reset and, because their home isn't worth what they paid for it, they can't refinance; maybe they've just decided, "Ya' know what? I owe $300,000 on my home, and it's only worth $250,000. I'm going to walk away."

There's lots of places to put blame for the fact that most people lost 25% of the value of their homes; but one of those places is definitely Wall Street. And in no small measure.

So. How do the banks handle people whose mortgages are delinquent? They foreclose. Oh, they may "do a work out" with some of them; but those are far and few between. In most instances, they begin foreclosure proceedings immedately. In most states, foreclosure can take a year or more. The people living in the homes stop paying their mortgage and resign themselves to the fact that they're going to be evicted down the road...so they live there rent-free. They don't care anymore because the house they bought three years ago for $300,000 is only worth $250,000 today. When they're forced to move, many of them strip the house of the light fixtures, appliances, plumbing fixtures...heck, some of them even take the hot water tank and air conditioner. And, of course, they stop taking care of the home because, frankly, who gives a damn anymore? And eventually, after a year or so, they move out.

When the foreclosure proceedings are completed, the bank hires contractors to put the house back into saleable condition -- they're easily dropping $15-$20,000 into repairs. And thousands into attorneys' fees, etc. They begin paying the real estate taxes and other expenses (like heat/lawncare, etc.) on the homes immediately....paying off the arrearage as well as current taxes. Then they put these distressed homes on the market, flooding the market and driving prices down even further. Eventually, maybe a year later, after easily laying out 50,000 or more, they sell the home for $225,000.

Had they offered the original owner forgiveness on $50,000 of their debt, the bank would have saved money, the real estate market wouldn't be flooded with distressed properties, real estate would stabilize, a family wouldn't have their credit trashed and have gone through the terrible process of losing their home.

We bailed out the banks big-time. So they could screw distressed homeowners with impunity.

Demonstrate on that. And, one more thing -- demonstrate against our government for not holding even one of these jamokes responsible for this debacle.
 
It's very similar to the 1960's with one exception - the civil rights movement was very focused and literal in their wants and needs. This current protest is disjointed, disorganized and incoherent. It's true, I do like a clear focus --- call me crazy.


I'm not wealthy and your ad hominem ladened rants is very entertaining, albeit partisan and ignorant. I admit, I do like corporatism I think it's the best system around (Your Mao nonsense seems to undercut how China has embraced, in a modern sense, capitalism), but if this OWS movement is going to be anything other than professional protesters demanding socialistic or as you say, Maoist or Trotsky-ist policy, they will sooner or later either have to temper their message and make it clearer, or become irrelevant and get dismiss
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…