• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lab origin disproven

Yes… to the video. That’s easier anyway than text.

How exactly could a lab origin of the pandemic be disproven, anyway?

The two studies, which are blasted all over the internet now, are preprints. That means they are not published, just posted by the authors. No peer review. No disclosure of funding or conflicts of interest.

This is obviously just more of the cover up. One of the authors was part of the bogus cover up "research" team that went to Wuhan last year and "investigated."

The lab origin theory is far from being disproven, and the natural origin theory is far from being proven.

But Fauci is powerful, and he does not want to be held responsible, since he promoted and helped to fund the gain of function research that probably caused the pandemic.
 
Morons have no idea how federal funding is done. It's not Fauci personally giving out the money. the research proposals are based on scientific studies and rationale. THere is no intended financial interest of getting results you want, unlike with corporate internal research. Your ability to get future funding, to get your work published, is based on your scientific integrity. You fudge data, you are done in science. And the reviewers of grants are other academics. The agencies only choose the target topics for grant funding, then the reviewers grade and funding given out that way.

Unlike corporations like oil and gas who have lied for decades trying to keep their cash cow
 
Morons have no idea how federal funding is done. It's not Fauci personally giving out the money. the research proposals are based on scientific studies and rationale. THere is no intended financial interest of getting results you want, unlike with corporate internal research. Your ability to get future funding, to get your work published, is based on your scientific integrity. You fudge data, you are done in science. And the reviewers of grants are other academics. The agencies only choose the target topics for grant funding, then the reviewers grade and funding given out that way.

Unlike corporations like oil and gas who have lied for decades trying to keep their cash cow

Oh wow you are so very wrong. You really think the scientific establishment is immune from corruption? Amazing.

Anything funded by NIAID would have to be approved by Fauci. Fauci has been very supportive of the dangerous virology research that likely caused the pandemic. He has been trying to cover it ups from the beginning, and here we go again. And the mainstream press blasts it, even though it isn't even published yet.
 
We will never know 100% if the virus originated at the Wuhan market. It's the most probable explanation as we know how easily it can cross species.
We do? And just how do 'we' know that?
 
Back
Top Bottom