• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lab Leak: The True Origins of Covid-19 – The White House (1 Viewer)

Theol reason that the “CIA favors the lab leak theory” is because one of Trump’s stooges is in charge.
False. That determination was made under Biden and they refused to release it to the public until Ratcliff came in under Trump.
Is isn’t the only instance where Trump has put his self serving ideological claims in front of the facts, and treies to substitute the.m.

He wants to denigrate the Chinese. So, he tells his morons that Dr. Fu Manchu cooked it up in his secret labarotory.
We were funding gain of function research in Wuhan China through EcoHealth Alliance. Your silly fu manchu reference doesn't change that.
And Trump sheep eat it up. They aren’t interested in facts, nor is Trump.

And yes, a Chinese conspiracy theory has benpeddled by Trump and his trash media chorus for four years.
The NYT is right wing media?
Any excuse to deflect from Trump’s incompetence and failure to lead.
Only compelte idiots or big pharma shills wouldn't want to figure out everything about a worldwide pandemic that killed millions and cost trillions.
 
Research that back up what they wrote? They are highlighting what the fraudster Kristian Andersen said. Why in the world would you ask for research about that?
highlights without a link to the source is just poor presentation.
Is your talking points machine glitching?
:LOL::LOL: is yours?
 
Your question was: "Did Trump scientifically research injecting disinfectant or using UV lights?" I can positively assure you that he did not. Understand?
Oh, then why did he suggest that?
Is he that stupid?
 
highlights without a link to the source is just poor presentation.

:LOL::LOL: is yours?
It's funny how you think you can ask for a research paper for everything and anything besides that isn't good enough. You aren't even good at trolling.
 
Who's letting China off the hook?

Fauci funded the gain of function research in Wuhan through EcoHealth Alliance. China and the US are both responsible.

You refuted that in your own post!
 
False. That determination was made under Biden and they refused to release it to the public until Ratcliff came in under Trump.

I could find no evidence to support that claim. Produce one.
We were funding gain of function research in Wuhan China through EcoHealth Alliance. Your silly fu manchu reference doesn't change that.

No, but it fits your conspiracy theory.
The NYT is right wing media?

What does the Times have to do with your claims?
Only compelte idiots or big pharma shills wouldn't want to figure out everything about a worldwide pandemic that killed millions and cost trillions.
 
Uh huh, except that they specifically cut pretty much any gains-of-function research
Cool!
and research dollars for medical research and scientific research. So there's that.
If said research is anything like the example I mentioned, I am all for cutting it.
 
Probably to troll TDS libruls.
Yeah, that's awesome.
I love when the President, during a time of a global epidemic and thousands of Americans are dying, felt the need to troll liberals.
I remember when FDR, during WW2, decided to troll Republicans. That was hilarious!
 
I could find no evidence to support that claim. Produce one.
Are you not familiar with Google?

A U.S. official granted anonymity to share private details about the assessment said former CIA director William Burns had told analysts that they needed to take a position on the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, but that he was agnostic on potential theories.

A new CIA analysis of the intelligence it had on the virus’ origin was completed and published internally before Ratcliffe’s arrival, the U.S. official said. Ratcliffe authorized its public release, the official added.
No, but it fits your conspiracy theory.
Conspiracy theory? Once again...Google?

The US Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday suspended funding to EcoHealth Alliance, a virus research organization tied to controversy about the origins of the virus that causes Covid-19. The agency also proposed the group be blocked from receiving federal funds in the future, possibly for years.

This transmission electron microscope image shows SARS-CoV-2—also known as 2019-nCoV, the virus that causes COVID-19. isolated from a patient in the U.S., emerging from the surface of cells cultured in the lab.

Before Covid-19 emerged, a US government grant to EcoHealth had funded studies into bat coronaviruses at the lab in Wuhan, China. Although US-funded research at the lab has not been linked to the pandemic, the US suspended funding to EcoHealth in 2020. The grant was later reinstated it. US funding to the Wuhan lab has since been blocked.

In a new letter to EcoHealth Alliance and its president, Dr. Peter Daszak, HHS lists 30 pieces of information, some dating back to 2013 to support its decision. HHS said in a memo that EcoHealth failed to “adequately monitor” virus growth in experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, notify the National Institutes of Health that viruses studied there “appeared to grow beyond permissible thresholds” laid out in a grant or provide requested information in a timely manner.
What does the Times have to do with your claims?
You said the lab leak was:

"a Chinese conspiracy theory has benpeddled by Trump and his trash media chorus for four years"

It seems like you call everything that you aren't familiar with a conspiracy theory. You are 0-3. Strikeout!

 
Are you not familiar with Google?

A U.S. official granted anonymity to share private details about the assessment said former CIA director William Burns had told analysts that they needed to take a position on the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, but that he was agnostic on potential theories.

A new CIA analysis of the intelligence it had on the virus’ origin was completed and published internally before Ratcliffe’s arrival, the U.S. official said. Ratcliffe authorized its public release, the official added.

Conspiracy theory? Once again...Google?

The US Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday suspended funding to EcoHealth Alliance, a virus research organization tied to controversy about the origins of the virus that causes Covid-19. The agency also proposed the group be blocked from receiving federal funds in the future, possibly for years.

This transmission electron microscope image shows SARS-CoV-2—also known as 2019-nCoV, the virus that causes COVID-19. isolated from a patient in the U.S., emerging from the surface of cells cultured in the lab.

Before Covid-19 emerged, a US government grant to EcoHealth had funded studies into bat coronaviruses at the lab in Wuhan, China. Although US-funded research at the lab has not been linked to the pandemic, the US suspended funding to EcoHealth in 2020. The grant was later reinstated it. US funding to the Wuhan lab has since been blocked.

In a new letter to EcoHealth Alliance and its president, Dr. Peter Daszak, HHS lists 30 pieces of information, some dating back to 2013 to support its decision. HHS said in a memo that EcoHealth failed to “adequately monitor” virus growth in experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, notify the National Institutes of Health that viruses studied there “appeared to grow beyond permissible thresholds” laid out in a grant or provide requested information in a timely manner.

You said the lab leak was:

"a Chinese conspiracy theory has benpeddled by Trump and his trash media chorus for four years"

It seems like you call everything that you aren't familiar with a conspiracy theory. You are 0-3. Strikeout!

=
Well, yes it was.

It has been pushed by Trump media for five years, nonstop.

You ought to read your own post.

You hung your hat on the Ratcliffe generated CIA revision. But neglected to admit that that assessment was made with
low confidence”.

I notice that your links are very recent. You are clearly eating up Trump noise.

Trump wants you to think about anything OTHER than the shameful way Trump mismanaged the crisis, yakked it up on TV, andthen refused to accept any responsibility for his incompetence,
 
=
Well, yes it was.

It has been pushed by Trump media for five years, nonstop.

You ought to read your own post.

You hung your hat on the Ratcliffe generated CIA revision. But neglected to admit that that assessment was made with
low confidence”.

I notice that your links are very recent. You are clearly eating up Trump noise.

Trump wants you to think about anything OTHER than the shameful way Trump mismanaged the crisis, yakked it up on TV, andthen refused to accept any responsibility for his incompetence,
Ah so you were shown to be wrong about that assessment being made under the Biden administration so then you moved the goal post to the confidence level.

You were shown to be wrong on all 3 points so you ignore that and shift to talking about Trump. 😆
 
Ah so you were shown to be wrong about that assessment being made under the Biden administration so then you moved the goal post to the confidence level.

You were shown to be wrong on all 3 points so you ignore that and shift to talking about Trump. 😆

No, I pointed out that the abrupt CIA revision was due to Trump politics, not science.
 
No, I pointed out that the abrupt CIA revision was due to Trump politics, not science.
Bullshit. I showed you that new assessment was done under Biden and then released under Trump. Do you normally deny basic facts?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom