• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kremlin Says Putin Survived Overnight Assassination Attempt

What do you mean "nobody disputes"? As if that means that everyone agrees this was a real attack. As others have said, if foreign drones are able to breach Russian airspace and get all the way to the Kremlin, Putin's got bigger problems than Ukraine. OTOH, the fact that the Russian propaganda minister was out right away with a press release, declaring all was well doesn't pass the smell test.

Thank God there just happened to be a local resident outside at 2am pointing his camera in the right place. Otherwise, some people might dispute the Russian version of events.

I still dispute the Russian version of events. If it was an actual attack, I would suspect Prigozhin is the guilty party. Otherwise, it's BS propaganda.
 
That's not an accurate analogy, and what Russia is doing isn't even remotely comparable to what the US has done in modern times.
First of all, the US war in Iraq was illegal, based on fraud, wasn't it? WMD? Links to Al Qaeta?

Libya - illegal war.

Syria - illegal war.


An accurate analogy would be if the US were actively installing US agents throughout the government in Mexico without fair elections by the people with the intention of illegally annexing the entirety of the country and expanding US territory, then if Russia then fomented a coup against this US-led government in order to prevent the illegal annexation of Mexico by the US, and then the US responded with a military invasion of Mexico targeting civilians and committing war crimes.

The coup in 2014 in Ukraine overturned an elected government. You are now arguing that if the US thinks that the elected government in another country is not legitimate, that the US has a right to overthrow it in a coup? That is what you - purporting to be on the Left -- are advocating?

That is an unjustified invasion. The rest of the world would be right to treat the US as a pariah state in that case.
The bottom line is, if Russia supported a coup in Mexico City, our Marines would be in the Halls of Montezuma quicker than you can say Jack Robinson. And, you know it. The US would do that because it is a security issue for the US - we would not allow our enemies to be on our border like that.

I am not saying Russia is "right" to invade Ukraine. What I am saying is that there is reason behind it. There is a security interest, and the war could have been avoided altogether if the US/NATO had recognized that and negotiated accordingly. The people that are paying for this whole situation are the citizens of Ukraine. They are dying by the thousands, and their country has been wrecked. It was all unnecessary.
Russia's goal is not to prevent NATO influence on its borders, and hasn't been since the cold war. Russia's goal in the 21st century has always been imperialist military expansion. NATO is just standing in their way.
Wow. Just.... wow.... what is the US's goal in invading countries all over the world, maintaining hundreds of military bases, assimilating country after country into NATO?
Russia does not hate NATO because it is a threat to current Russian territory. It categorically is not. Russia hates NATO because it is standing in the way of what Russia (or at least Putin) believes should be future Russian territory.
Well you sure have learned the neocon line.
 
What gets me is the pro Ukraine mob are not even honest enough to admit how all this started, it could be said even before 2014
It started when the first tribe went to war with the second tribe.

And then proclaimed the land as theirs.

Then other tribes came swooping in, and the strongest tribe won the land.

(In other words, Putin is screwed.)
 
Ah. I shoulda known.

Why not all the other ones, too?

Conspiracy theories are easy to make.
It's not a theory it was actually a conspiracy, the same people took Luther King, Malcomb X, and the brother of Kennedy out, i know some Americans don't want to face reality it's better for their state of mind just to believe the official nonsense and not think too much about the sort of people who have the power.
 
Wow. Just.... wow.... what is the US's goal in invading countries all over the world, maintaining hundreds of military bases, assimilating country after country into NATO?
You can't believe that's an accurate analogy. No one is being forced to join NATO. NATO doesn't invade countries to force them to join NATO. You have to ask, politely.

Not to mention that NATO is not the US. It's an international group.

The US expands by being rich and having famous pop stars and popular movies and a stable, democratic government.

Russia expands by violently invading its neighbors.

That's a substantial difference.
 
It's not a theory it was actually a conspiracy, the same people took Luther King, Malcomb X, and the brother of Kennedy out, i know some Americans don't want to face reality it's better for their state of mind just to believe the official nonsense and not think too much about the sort of people who have the power.
So it's not the conspiracy theorists who are nuts? It's regular folk?

I dunno. That hasn't been my experience.

So, anyway, where do these powerful people meet to lay plans for killing JFK, Bobby Kennedy, MLK and Malcolm X? Who are they, exactly?
 
You can't believe that's an accurate analogy. No one is being forced to join NATO. NATO doesn't invade countries to force them to join NATO. You have to ask, politely.
It is an accurate analogy. If Russia was trying to convince Mexico to join CSTO, we would put a stop to it. By an means necessary.
Not to mention that NATO is not the US. It's an international group.
NATO is the US. C'mon, man! The US runs NATO.

What the ****, folks? You're supposed to be on the Left. What happened to you people????
The US expands by being rich and having famous pop stars and popular movies and a stable, democratic government.
Save your neoconservative "we're spreading freedom" nonsense for someone who doesn't know better. Laughable.
Russia expands by violently invading its neighbors.
One neighbor. Ukraine. With a huge amount of context leading up to it over 2 decades.

The US expands by invading Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and by fomenting civil war in Yemen.
That's a substantial difference.
That's neocon bullshit. You probably voted for Bush.
 
It is an accurate analogy. If Russia was trying to convince Mexico to join CSTO, we would put a stop to it. By an means necessary.
I don't know anything about CSTO... what kind of reputation it has. If it's a defensive organization, why would we care?

Pretty sure we have no plans to invade Mexico.
NATO is the US. C'mon, man! The US runs NATO.
So you think I'm unaware that the US is the dominant partner in NATO? Really?

Just to speed things up, assume that I have the basic facts down.

But NATO is not the US. Are you aware of that -- that it's a multi-nation organization?
What the ****, folks? You're supposed to be on the Left. What happened to you people????
Who is supposed to be on the left? What are you talking about?

Could your tribal view of the world be exposing itself here?
Save your neoconservative "we're spreading freedom" nonsense for someone who doesn't know better. Laughable.
Come on. Try to take the debate seriously.
One neighbor. Ukraine. With a huge amount of context leading up to it over 2 decades.
All invasions have context leading up to them. Every one. Read about it.
The US expands by invading Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and by fomenting civil war in Yemen.
Yeah, I don't think we've absorbed any neighbors into our nation for a very long time now. Pretty sure.
That's neocon bullshit. You probably voted for Bush.
What the ****, folks? You're supposed to be extreme MAGA. What happened to you people????
 
So it's not the conspiracy theorists who are nuts? It's regular folk?

I dunno. That hasn't been my experience.

So, anyway, where do these powerful people meet to lay plans for killing JFK, Bobby Kennedy, MLK and Malcolm X? Who are they, exactly?
Don't tell me you think some ex US marine killed Kennedy with a rusty Italian rifle LOL!
 
The closer Biden gets to impeachment, the more escalation there is towards WW3.

Wag the Dog, anyone?
 
Don't tell me you think some ex US marine killed Kennedy with a rusty Italian rifle LOL!
It was only a matter of time before the bat shittery came flowing forth from you.
 
The closer Biden gets to impeachment, the more escalation there is towards WW3.

Wag the Dog, anyone?
It's not a contest. You can both share the bat shittery award.
 
Oh no, I don't hold a candle to your batshittery. I am very humbled.
Batshit was blowing up a major fuel pipeline of the world's largest nuclear power -- and then denying it, even while smirking and gloating about it later, in front of the cameras.
Eventually, the batshittery from the Whitehouse is going to earn retaliatory attacks. Which is probably what Wag-the-Dog Biden wants.
 
Batshit was blowing up a major fuel pipeline of the world's largest nuclear power --
Oh look, another unevidenced lie.

You don't even know when you are making up lies anymore, do ya?
 
Oh look, another unevidenced lie.

You don't even know when you are making up lies anymore, do ya?
Same old batshit -- same batshit time, same batshit channel

Threatening to destroy the pipeline -- all on camera in front of the media -- denying it later on -- all on camera in front of the media -- gloating about it later on -- all on camera in front of the media -- then making up some other bullshyte fallback story to protect yourself because you know you violated Article 1 of the US Constitution
 
Same old batshit -- same batshit time, same batshit channel

Threatening to destroy the pipeline -- all on camera in front of the media -- denying it later on -- all on camera in front of the media -- gloating about it later on -- all on camera in front of the media -- then making up some other bullshyte fallback story to protect yourself because you know you violated Article 1 of the US Constitution
He didn't threat that. That's another idiotic white wing lie someone spoonfed to you.

This is just getting sad.
 
He didn't threat that. That's another idiotic white wing lie someone spoonfed to you.

This is just getting sad.
One always wonders if people are lying or whether sincerely propagandized.
 
Don't tell me you think some ex US marine killed Kennedy with a rusty Italian rifle LOL!
Suddenly, all of your posts in this thread make sense to me. You've tied yourself up in a nice little bow.
 



Oy, this is not cool. Who has the motive and capacity to do this?

Probably wasn't even at the Kremlin.
 
Back
Top Bottom