- Joined
- Nov 1, 2014
- Messages
- 6,474
- Reaction score
- 757
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
In my political discussion email group, we have four Libertarians. Two are hardcore Trump supporters and sound indistinguishable from MAGA. One of the remaining two voted for Trump and the other leaned in his direction. I don’t understand why so many Libertarians support Trump, but then I’m not a Libertarian. I’m a non-interventionist Conservative who models himself after past Republicans like Dwight Eisenhower and Robert Taft. The best members of Congress in my lifetime were Libertarian Republicans like Massie, Ron Paul, and Justin Amash or non-interventionist Conservative Republicans like former Representatives Jimmy Duncan and John Hostettler. Btw, Paul, Duncan, and Hostettler were three of only six House Republicans to vote “no” on giving George W. Bush authorization to invade Iraq way back in 2002.
Mark
I'm generally in agreement with Amash, Paul, Massie as to foreign policy...
But none of them satisfy my tastes as to 'government secrecy' [they need to be much much much LOUDER, urgent, etc.]...routine secretive regime change operations, etc. secretive/obfuscated foreign [and domestic] policies will NEVER be a part of any sane decent honest intelligent etc. government:
"I saw a video clip of Julian Assange speaking in London in 2010 where he made an important observation while explaining the philosophy behind his work with WikiLeaks. He said that all our political theories are to some extent “bankrupt” in our current situation, because our institutions are so shrouded in secrecy that we can’t even know what’s really going on in the world.
“We can all write about our political issues, we can all push for particular things we believe in, we can all have particular brands of politics, but I say actually it’s all bankrupt,” Assange said. “And the reason it’s all bankrupt, and all current political theories are bankrupt and particular lines of political thought, is because actually we don’t know what the hell is going on. And until we know the basic structures of our institutions — how they operate in practice, these titanic organizations, how they behave inside, not just through stories but through vast amounts of internal documentations — until we know that, how can we possibly make a diagnosis? How can we set the direction to go until we know where we are? We don’t even have a map of where we are. So our first task is to build up a sort of intellectual heritage that describes where we are. And once we know where we are, then we have a hope of setting course for a different direction. Until then, I think all political theories — to greater and lesser extents of course — are bankrupt.”
It’s an extremely important point if you think about it: how can we form theories about how our governments should be operating when we have no idea how they are currently operating? How can a doctor prescribe the correct treatment when he hasn’t yet made a diagnosis?
Political theories are in this sense “bankrupt”, because they are formed in the dark, without our being able to see precisely what’s happening and what’s going wrong.
The nature of our institutions is hidden from us, and that includes not only our government institutions but the political, media, corporate and financial institutions which control so much of our society. Their nature is hidden not only by a complete lack of transparency but by things like propaganda, internet censorship, Silicon Valley algorithm manipulation, and the fact that all the most loudly amplified voices in our society are those who more or less support status quo politics..."

Real Change Is Impossible While Our World Is Shrouded In Secrecy
How can we form theories about how our governments should be operating when we have no idea how they are currently operating? How can a doctor prescribe the correct treatment when he hasn’t y…

Last edited: