Dont invoke Reagan's name in this mess your ideology has created.
Even on your best day, you can't paint Obama as Reagan.
Iran buying US products such as Coca Cola undermines their whole "death to US" thingy...as in like you know...the topic of the thread??? Duh!!!
No one ever makes inflated claims as part of negotiations...
You better tell that to all the Jews who've worked with him over the years. I'm sure they wouldn't mind your flawless insight into Obama's mind. :lol:
Finally an Iranian moderate in the Leadership speaks out.a day after President Barack Obama appealed to Iran to seize a “historic opportunity” for a nuclear deal and a better future, and as US Secretary of State John Kerry claimed substantial progress toward an accord.Iran’s Supreme leader Ali Khamenei called for “Death to America” on Saturday,
Khamenei told a crowd in Tehran that Iran would not capitulate to Western demands. When the crowd started shouting, “Death to America,” the ayatollah responded: “Of course yes, death to America, because America is the original source of this pressure.
Read more: Khamenei calls 'Death to America' as Kerry hails progress on nuke deal | The Times of Israel Khamenei calls 'Death to America' as Kerry hails progress on nuke deal | The Times of Israel
Even on your best day, you can't paint Obama as Reagan.
Did you know that Reagan secretly asked the Iranians not to release the US prisoners until after he was inaugerated so that he could take the credit instead of Jimmy Carter?
Then later he committed treason during the Iran Contra scandal.
Reagan and Iran were thick as thieves together.
No doubt the right wing Saudi Wahhabi apologists will try to blame Obama for Reagans crimes.....even though he was still a teenager at the time.
No lie is too big or too small for the right wing base to swallow with their daily dose of potty sauce.
In September 1980, Saddam Hussein started a war against Iran that would have devastating consequences for both countries. The war -the longest conventional war in the 20th century- was characterized by Iraq’s indiscriminate ballistic-missile attacks and extensive use of chemical weapons.
The war resulted in at least half a million and probably twice as many troops killed on both sides, and in at least half a million men who became permanently disabled. The U.S. actively supported Saddam Hussein in his war efforts with billions of dollars in credits, advanced technology, weaponry, military intelligence, and Special Operations training.
Pentagon officials in Baghdad planned day-by-day bombing strikes for the Iraqi Air Force. According to the U.S. former ambassador Peter W. Galbraith, Iraq used this data to target Iranian positions with chemical weapons. Despite the brutality of these attacks, Iran didn’t respond in kind.
In 1984, Iran presented a draft resolution to the United Nations Security Council condemning Saddam Hussein’s use of chemical weapons, based on the Geneva Protocol of 1925. The U.S. instructed its delegate at the UN to lobby friendly representatives to support a motion to abstain on the vote on the use of chemical weapons by Iraq. Given these facts, can we be surprised that Iranians have a deep resentment against the U.S.?
Your litany is mostly accurate. The U.S. did those things because Saddam Hussein had botched Iraq's prosecution of the war so badly that for a time it was in danger of losing it. The U.S. wanted both sides to weaken each other, and to keep this process going it became necessary to help Iraq. What of it? The U.S. and Britain also helped Saddam's hero and fellow murderous bastard Josef Stalin during World War Two. I don't care what the Jew-hating, America-hating Islamic jihadists who make up the regime in Tehran resent. They can all go straight to hell.
Iran buying US products such as Coca Cola undermines their whole "death to US" thingy...as in like you know...the topic of the thread??? Duh!!!
Iran buying US products such as Coca Cola undermines their whole "death to US" thingy...as in like you know...the topic of the thread??? Duh!!!
I see, so despite over 30 years of killing Americans all over the world, being the worlds largest state sponsor of terrorism, its treatment of women, gays, and religious minorities, and being headed by a radical fundamentalist islamic cleric who is chanting with his nation DEATH TO AMERICA! as he stalls to get nukes, they are really ok-because they drink coke.
Duh indeed.
Where's your proof that Iran is the worlds largest sponsor of terrorism??
Oh no! They said "Death to America" that must mean they are going to kill us all! :scared::scared:
Well, do we have to wait for the smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud over a US city?
Look, I'm well aware of US foreign policy interests in weakening nations. A very fine democratic ambition. And no surprise that you would approve. Bottom line here is that we have every reason and possibility to have a positive relationship with Iran. But there's too many that have too much to gain by maintaining tensions and violence in the ME.
I believe that we heard that same line before G.W. Bush put Iran's Shia friends in charge in Iraq. :roll:
Where's your proof that Iran is the worlds largest sponsor of terrorism?? Here's what your idol, Ronny's boy had to say.
The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom – noted:
Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics, the slogans of today’s war on terrorism merely makes the United States look hypocritical to the rest of the world.
Odom also said:
By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.
It is in the interests of the United States for any two regimes that are hostile to us to harm each other as much as possible. I approve of a foreign policy that advances our interests.
I hope the U.S. will some day have a positive relationship with Iran, just as it has had before. Before that can happen, though, the Khomeinist regime that has been oppressing that country for thirty-five years must be brought down. But when freedom-loving, pro-Western Iranians challenged that regime in 2009, at very great risk to themselves, Mr. Obama, Islamist-coddling weak sister that he is, did not even so much as give them verbal support.
Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
State Department: Iran Supports Al Qaeda, Taliban | The Weekly Standard
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/195768.pdf
'Iran's support for terrorism highest in decade' - International - Jerusalem Post
State Sponsors: Iran - Council on Foreign Relations
State Sponsors of Terrorism
It is in the interests of the United States for any two regimes that are hostile to us to harm each other as much as possible. I approve of a foreign policy that advances our interests.
I hope the U.S. will some day have a positive relationship with Iran, just as it has had before. Before that can happen, though, the Khomeinist regime that has been oppressing that country for thirty-five years must be brought down. But when freedom-loving, pro-Western Iranians challenged that regime in 2009, at very great risk to themselves, Mr. Obama, Islamist-coddling weak sister that he is, did not even so much as give them verbal support.
Lol. You quote the worlds biggest supporter of and projector of terrorism to inform your opinion on Iran's use of terrorism, thanks for the chuckle.
It is proof when the claims are made by US state and military officials so you have no point here.
Sources are good, you just dont want to believe it since youre a mortal enemy of Iran and an Isreali war crimes apologist so thats to be expected too.First link is a delusional story with no proof to back it up - it claims it relies solely on some CIA memos and it's an Haaretz article that reports on it so yeah right. Second and third aren't even real sources. Try again.
Right, the same people who said that Iraq has WMDs and we must invade... youre not fooling anyone with that ...well maybe the warhawks and neocons but thats to be expected...
Sources are good, you just dont want to believe it since youre a mortal enemy of Iran and an Isreali war crimes apologist so thats to be expected too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?