Montecresto
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2013
- Messages
- 24,561
- Reaction score
- 5,507
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
:lamo Suuuuuure.
Yeah. You mad. And I dont blame you. It would suck having to defend that ridiculous ****ing circus clown in the WH.
Its not about being on Putins side...far from it. As has been expressed countless times...Putin is a douchebag. Obama makes him look like a rokstar.
No...but their people were pressing to be.
They ahd already charted a path and created economic ties and were working towards EU membership.
Yanukovych chose to abandon the will of the people, cut ties to the EU, and move the Ukraine back to Russia. Thats what has triggered this whole mess. Or have you missed that?
There is a massive difference.
First of all the population of Cuba are not American or even have English as their first language.
Secondly the Cuban American agreement pre-dates the present Cuban regime but Cuba cant do anything about it. The US is occupying GITMO supposedly legally but in reality you bullied your way to the base when you supported the puppet dictator of Cuba at the time and are paying next to nothing for it.
Now in the Crimea you an area that was given to the Ukraine in 1954 or so by the Soviets. The population is 90% Russian, the main language is Russian and they have considerable self rule in the first place. They actually dont want to be part of the Ukraine and never have been. There is also an agreement between the Ukraine and Russia for Russian troops to be in the Crimea and operate there pretty much independently because of the Russian Black Sea Fleet.
In some ways yes...but with a much much bigger majority of Russians than there was German's in Sudetenland.
Stop making stupid comments he cant back up. Stop threatening red lines and wars in the first place. Stop making empty vapid threats built on rhetoric. Act or dont but stop with the pretense you are. If you want credibility as a diplomat and statesman than BE one. Engage world leaders. Stop being a ****ing clown. This is Syria redux and the world is laughing at him.What is your suggestion that Obama do?
So what do you call taking over a region's government buildings with foreign troops then? A picnic?
Funny cause every defense analyst says they are Russian troops, heck even the Russians themselves admit it. :doh
Russia admits that it has moved troops in Ukraine - Telegraph
Kerry condemns Russia's 'incredible act of aggression' in Ukraine | Reuters
"You just don't in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pre-text," Kerry told the CBS program
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
What would the USA gain by going to war with Russia over the Ukraine?
So what's the big problem then?
Russia's fleet has given Ukrainian forces in Crimea until 3am to surrender or face a military assault, according to Interfax.
The ultimatum came from the commander of Russia's Black Sea Fleet Alexander Vitko, which has a base in Crimea where Russian forces are now in control.
According to the agency, it reads: "If they do not surrender before 5am (3am GMT) tomorrow, a real assault will be started against units and divisions of the armed forces across Crimea."
So you were happy with Hitler's annexation of the Sudetenland and eventual takeover of Czechoslovakia? I see.In some ways yes...but with a much much bigger majority of Russians than there was German's in Sudetenland.
So you were happy with Hitler's annexation of the Sudetenland and eventual takeover of Czechoslovakia? I see.
Because they happen to be in Ukraine which isnt Russia. Let me ask you, if Turkish troops took over Berlin since Germany has a Turkish minority you wouldnt have a problem with that either?First off it has far from been established that it is "foreign" troops. And how can it be "foreign troops" when 90% of the population is Russian?
Thats the news according to the Russians, but Crimea is a part of Ukraine and their capital is Kiev isnt it?Secondly the regional government is actually pro-Russian and according to the reports, the men with guns who took over the buildings, did so to protect them from troops and armed men from Kiev.
How exactly were the Ukrainian nationalists threatening the port of Sevastopol? There was no military buildup by the Ukrainians prior to the Russian takeover.The whole situation is driven by fear and that fear is based on past history. The people in Crimea dont trust Kiev because Kiev has removed and tried to remove even more rights form the area. It use to be very independent from the rest of the Ukraine but Kiev has been for years been pulling back powers. And that has all to do with one thing... the military port of Sevastepol... presently under Russian control and wanted badly by the Ukrainian nationalists. That is what Russia is protecting.
Anyone with half a brain knows they are Russian troops, they have the same uniform and they are armed with military weapons, if they were vigilantes they wouldnt be that well armed or equipped. It seems to me you have completely swallowed the Russian propaganda machine hook, line and sinker. Congrats.No and no. Russia has admitted it moved some troops to the Crimea yes, but it has not said that those troops have taken over the government buildings or anything else.
Also the so called analysts are just that.. analysts and often with a hidden agenda, especially the American and British ones. Some are even pushing for war for **** sake..
Because they happen to be in Ukraine which isnt Russia. Let me ask you, if Turkish troops took over Berlin since Germany has a Turkish minority you wouldnt have a problem with that either?
Thats the news according to the Russians, but Crimea is a part of Ukraine and their capital is Kiev isnt it?
How exactly were the Ukrainian nationalists threatening the port of Sevastopol? There was no military buildup by the Ukrainians prior to the Russian takeover.
Anyone with half a brain knows they are Russian troops, they have the same uniform and they are armed with military weapons, if they were vigilantes they wouldnt be that well armed or equipped. It seems to me you have completely swallowed the Russian propaganda machine hook, line and sinker. Congrats.
So you were happy with Hitler's annexation of the Sudetenland and eventual takeover of Czechoslovakia? I see.
Again Crimea was Russia up to 1954. And the Russians are not a minority in Crimea.. they are the huge majority.
Crimea has their own legislative and have considerable self-rule. The government in Kiev has been slowly but surely chipping away at that self rule, which is part of the over all problem.
It is all paranoia, I dont deny that. But politically the Ukrainian nationalists want Sevastopol and the Russian Black Sea fleet, because they see it as Ukraine's since the fall of the Soviet Union. They also were not happy when the Ukraine gave up its nukes.
And anyone with half a brain also can see that they could just as well be Russian Ukrainians serving in the Ukrainian military/police... since they have the same uniforms. It is in no way as simple as you want it to be and has nothing to do with the Russian propaganda machine. Fact is the Crimea has been run by the Russian speaking population there for decades, so their own police and para-military units not only look Russian but speak Russian. You seem to have eaten the propaganda coming out of Kiev. You do know that the Ukrainian Navy Chief has pledged his and his fleets allegiance to the Russians right? Why would local troops not do the same? Ever think of that?
I suppose he'd be OK with North Korea invading South Korea since there's a Korean majority in it too. :roll:Which clearly was ok, since the majority of the population of Sudentenland was German already.
I wonder if the EU didn't know how the Russian population felt and Putin would probably react or whether they understood the implications of their treaty proposal.
The US should lead the opposition to this act of war (yes, invading a sovereign nation and its territorial integrity is considered an act of war) with economic and diplomatic sanctions against Russia. Get everyone on record with who they support, including the UN, EU, and Nato to investigate any situation threatening international peace; recommend procedures for peaceful resolution of a dispute; call upon other member nations to completely or partially interrupt economic relations as well as sea, air, postal, and radio communications, or to sever diplomatic relations; and enforce its decisions.
Let Russia come across as the brutish invaders and reap the repercussions, they are the ones who have sent militias across the border. Basically, the US needs to lead the world into making it more expensive (politically or otherwise) to stay in Ukraine. France, the UK, and the US will stand together, but how China responds will also be key.
The point here, is that one nation can not invade another, and there are going to be those who do something about it-and those that dont. We are at a distinct disadvantage with a weak president who not only advertises his unwillingness to use force but also has squandered his political capital at home and abroad. An actual leader wouldn't even be in this mess=Obama's foreign policy has been appallingly bad.
Stop making stupid comments he cant back up. Stop threatening red lines and wars in the first place. Stop making empty vapid threats built on rhetoric. Act or dont but stop with the pretense you are. If you want credibility as a diplomat and statesman than BE one. Engage world leaders. Stop being a ****ing clown. This is Syria redux and the world is laughing at him.
Stop making stupid comments he cant back up. Stop threatening red lines and wars in the first place. Stop making empty vapid threats built on rhetoric. Act or dont but stop with the pretense you are. If you want credibility as a diplomat and statesman than BE one. Engage world leaders. Stop being a ****ing clown. This is Syria redux and the world is laughing at him.
You sure are obsessed over appearances. Who gives a **** if someone is laughing?
Again Crimea was Russia up to 1954. And the Russians are not a minority in Crimea.. they are the huge majority.
Crimea has their own legislative and have considerable self-rule. The government in Kiev has been slowly but surely chipping away at that self rule, which is part of the over all problem.
It is all paranoia, I dont deny that. But politically the Ukrainian nationalists want Sevastopol and the Russian Black Sea fleet, because they see it as Ukraine's since the fall of the Soviet Union. They also were not happy when the Ukraine gave up its nukes.
And anyone with half a brain also can see that they could just as well be Russian Ukrainians serving in the Ukrainian military/police... since they have the same uniforms. It is in no way as simple as you want it to be and has nothing to do with the Russian propaganda machine. Fact is the Crimea has been run by the Russian speaking population there for decades, so their own police and para-military units not only look Russian but speak Russian. You seem to have eaten the propaganda coming out of Kiev. You do know that the Ukrainian Navy Chief has pledged his and his fleets allegiance to the Russians right? Why would local troops not do the same? Ever think of that?
The US, UK, And France at boycotting the G8 until Russia is either booted or pulls out of Ukraine. Russia being out of G8 means they can't veto a sanction.
58% isn't a huge majority.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?