• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kennedy is making food stamp recipients actually cook. The horror!!!

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Food/snap-benefits-junk-food-maha/story?id=124415390



Leftoids are shitting themselves that their crotch fruit won't get to enjoy the same "foods" that children with working parents will. They might have to actually buy food and spend some of their preparing it. The point of welfare is to avoid work though.

Mainstream righties are looking for other ways to funnel taxpayer money into big agribusiness coffers.
It's mostly symbolic. Most people have to spend some of their own money along with snap. They will just sort out the food thst way.
Or sell their snap at a discount to buy their cheetos with cash.
 
I think there's an argument to be made that the poor are often a target of the wealthy's virtue signaling campaigns. Kind of like how you see white trust fund kids in social studies programs speaking up for "the oppressed."

If these foods are so unhealthy that EBT money should not be spent on them, then why should these products exist in America at all?
Because people should be free to wreck their health. Just don't don't on my dime.
 
Because people should be free to wreck their health. Just don't don't on my dime.

Why do you object to someone using food vouchers to buy a bottle of wine to go with their thanksgiving dinner or for their birthday?

And what about state employees like teachers or police who are being paid by taxpayers? That's on your dime as well, are thewy also banned from buying a bottle of wine?
 
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Food/snap-benefits-junk-food-maha/story?id=124415390



Leftoids are shitting themselves that their crotch fruit won't get to enjoy the same "foods" that children with working parents will. They might have to actually buy food and spend some of their preparing it. The point of welfare is to avoid work though.

Mainstream righties are looking for other ways to funnel taxpayer money into big agribusiness coffers.
Lol, so no candy or soda means you have to "cook"?

I guess microwave meals count as cooking...

No one was replacing meals with soda and candy. Probably eating in addition to meals, but not eating as meals.
 
Why do you object to someone using food vouchers to buy a bottle of wine to go with their thanksgiving dinner or for their birthday?
They need incentive to improve themselves.

Why don't you volunteer more of your money for poor people to party?
 
They need incentive to improve themselves.

Why don't you volunteer more of your money for poor people to party?

And preventing them from buying a $5 bottle of wine on their birthday is going to incentivise them? Are they banned from going to the cinema as well? How about buying a birthday cake or a Christmas present for a son or daughter?

Preventing people from being able to enjoy little things now and then isn't going to incentivise them, it's just going to make them depressed.
 
Because people should be free to wreck their health. Just don't don't on my dime.
So a vet living off the government uses his money to buy alcohol and drink himself into a stupor every day.....I guess we need to regulate which vets get money?
 
Soda and maybe candy sounds like a waste. But "all taxable food items as defined by the Iowa Department of Revenue except food producing plants and seeds for food producing plants" (in your own article) sounds like a very substantial restriction. Notice that "MEAT" is included in what is called "junk food"!

So go ahead MAGA, brag about how you just turned all the poor kids into vegans. Pity that doesn't come with an instruction manual about the risks of missing essential amino acids -- you'll be seeing a lot of those kids back cluttering up your the emergency rooms in time. Better start oiling the club now to deal with them.
meat is not a taxable food item in Iowa
 
Good morning! Now that I'm fully awake, let's dive back in:

No answer, I see.

Ma'am -- you asked for evidence of ancient humans eating meat. I gave it to you, you didn't read it and now are accusing me of not answering. Make it make sense.

You said you have thousands of studies.

You couldn't find one?

Nowhere did I say I had "thousands of studies". You are having trouble following the conversation. You seemingly didn't even know that a lot of people eat only animal products. You asked how many carnivores there were and I said "thousands". It's okay to get mixed up, it's not okay to pretend you aren't.

I wrote an article about choline where I stood up for eggs.

I'd like to read it. Link me?

My cardiologist agrees eggs are fine, once a day for me max for now. They're nowhere near as bad with, say, cholesterol as boiled shrimp, to give an example. And their fat level is VERY low compared to...oh, I don't know. Yes I do! A burger.

Other cardiologists like Dr. Ovadia would disagree with you on red meat and animal fat consumption.


And nephrologist, Dr. Jason Fung


Along with two of his books which are excellent: The Obesity Code & The Diabetes Code

And a fertility specialist who helps women get pregnant by changing their diet, Dr. Kiltz:


Dr. Elizabeth Bright, who specializes in women's hormone health:


Dr. Georgia Ede, a psychologist, who wrote a book about how poor diet can be detrimental to our mental health:


Along with, of course, Dr. Berry and Dr. Baker (who are very well-known in the carnivore health space)

OTOH, is protein itself always healthy? It could kill my FIL, so his is very restricted. So I'm going with: no. Not always.

Too much of a good thing is sometimes not good, yes.

People eating only animal products is a very new thing. There are no long-term studies on it. There is one short-term study in the links above.

Now, you say that eating ground beef by itself with no sauces, no bread, no cheese is unhealthy. Show me the study that says that. Because the short-term carnivore study linked above shows the exact opposite.

When you have a long-term nutritional study where you give participants a survey and ask them to recount how many times they ate XYZ over the past 10 years, you're not going to get accurate information. Also, you're not going to be able to pinpoint a culprit because the standard American diet is very diverse. They count eating spaghetti as "red meat consumption" and say AH HA! It's the red meat! Why isn't it the pasta? ("It's not about the pasta!!") Why isn't it the sugary pasta sauce (have you ever seen just how much sugar is in store-bought pasta sauces?) Why isn't about the bread you're most likely eating on the side? Why isn't it about the quantity of all of that (American eat a LOT of food in one sitting). There are no studies that show red meat causes XYZ disease. They show very, very, very weak correlations based on people remembering what they ate over several years.

A true long-term study on how red meat - and red meat only, not added to a casserole or pasta dish or Big Mac - affects the body is much needed. I believe a few of those studies are in the process right now so it will be interesting to see what the results are.

I think we can all agree that a healthy diet doesn't regularly include chips, candy, deep fried foods, sugar or foods that cause a spike in blood sugar upon eating. Eat real low glycemic food - meat, non-starchy veggies, some fruit and nuts. I'm preaching to myself here too.
 
The point of food stamps is to prevent malnutrition. If they are eating junk food it's not preventing malnutrition.

I'll ask again: Should food stamps pay for alcohol? After all, by your argument, "The money is spent". :rolleyes:

All Kennedy has actually done is applied basically the same standards to Food Stamps that the Federal Government has applied to WIC for decades.
Alcohol isn't food.
 
Haven’t spent one second of my time thinking about this topic, but the first thing that comes to mind is that it’s yet another reminder that Republicans hate freedom.
Interesting. It reminds me that when you get something from government, you shouldn't be surprised when they want to attach strings to what you get.
 
Interesting. It reminds me that when you get something from government, you shouldn't be surprised when they want to attach strings to what you get.

And Republicans suddenly became supporters of the Nanny state.
 
And Republicans suddenly became supporters of the Nanny state.
Play team politics somewhere else. I believe in welfare for those who can't help themselves, even if you are the nanny.
 
So a vet living off the government uses his money to buy alcohol and drink himself into a stupor every day.....I guess we need to regulate which vets get money?
They earned it.
 
And preventing them from buying a $5 bottle of wine on their birthday is going to incentivise them? Are they banned from going to the cinema as well? How about buying a birthday cake or a Christmas present for a son or daughter?
With my money, yes if its poosible.
Preventing people from being able to enjoy little things now and then isn't going to incentivise them, it's just going to make them depressed.
Sorry but that's how most people work they have incentives to want something and so they work to get it.

I personally hate getting up and going to work but guess what I want stuff so I do it
 
Dem fatasses just want to feed their spawn frozen pizza and off brand soda.

The notion of actually preparing dinner is too much work.
I hate to bust your bubble, but I love to cook and am pretty damn good at it too. Your generalization of dems is a typical MAGA lie.
 
of course not but when I lived in the city buying food stamps for pennies on the dollar was common

sounds like massive fraud and a system that needs bigly overhauled
 
Back
Top Bottom