• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kennedy is making food stamp recipients actually cook. The horror!!!

So you agree with government run grocery stores that can leverage the government's size to purchase healthy foods at cheaper prices and make those available to these folks, correct?

It's okay, I know you just hate them and wish them ill.

where did I say that ?
 
Okay. But you'd be wrong. We have a great relationship with our neighbors. The cul-de-sac has a rotation for hosting the three major summer holidays, and one of the families had everyone over yesterday due to our kids returning to school this week.

So, do you call your kids crotch fruit in the company of the other women in your life, or do you just reserve that term for the groups of people you don’t like?
 

Uh, no. Disease, infections, predators, natural disasters, pregnancy complications/infant death.

I haven't heard or read the research that claims ancient humans who ate a lot of animal protein/fats had similar bodies to the typical obese Americans now with obesity-related illnesses.

And it's stuffed with grease and cholesterol.

Animal fats aren't the enemy. It's what we started adding to the animal foods that has caused the increase in obesity and all of the obesity-related disease. Along with all of the non-foods out there that we've shoved down our gullets for decades.

If beef was the problem, we should be seeing all of the carnivores out there getting fatter and then dropping dead from heart attacks. Right?
 
Last edited:
You can get many of those nutrients from plants and others from healthier meats.

You can be healthy eating plants and other meats, yes.
 
What if you cook with Coca-Cola?

It makes great marinades and sauces especially for pork.

Also great tenderizer for those tough cuts.

and tell me what % of people buy soda's for that purpose ? 0.00001 % ?
 
I think it's strange you're so obsessed with it. But I'm not surprised. You can feign outrage and not really have to do anything of substance.

Let me ask you something, why do you use the term, what’s the point of using it?

So you'd do nothing like I said.

Well, when someone is in need, especially the mentally ill, I think we should help them.
 
So, do you call your kids crotch fruit in the company of the other women in your life, or do you just reserve that term for the groups of people you don’t like?

I call my daughters by their names.

Your obsession with the term is comical. I'm starting to think you feel some sort of accomplishment for being offended on behalf of those who I'm talking about with it.
 
Your obsession with the term is comical. I'm starting to think you feel some sort of accomplishment for being offended on behalf of those who I'm talking about with it.

I don’t know. Who are you talking about? What group of people could you possibly be trying so hard to dehumanize? I have no idea. You tell me. Which group of people, and insulted in such a way, could possibly bring you so much joy? I just can’t imagine.
 
I don’t know. Who are you talking about? What group of people could you possibly be trying so hard to dehumanize? I have no idea. You tell me.

You're the one who's gone on about it nonstop, so you tell me who has asked you to take offense in their stead.

Of course you do. It would be stupid for you to call your daughters or their children crotch fruit, wouldn’t it?

That would be kind of weird. "What time am I picking you up from soccer practice crotch fruit?" doesn't really roll of the tongue too well.
 
And our technological advances in keeping us alive was what in 1950?

Uh, no. Disease, predators, natural disasters, pregnancy complications/infant death.

In 1950?

I haven't heard or read the research that claims ancient humans who ate a lot of animal protein/fats had similar bodies to the typical obese Americans now with obesity-related illnesses.

When did I say they did?

Meanwhile...






Animal fats aren't the enemy.

They are bad for your health. No food is "the enemy" but conservatives want to declare some foods the enemy, while keeping the ones they find really tasty.

It's what we started adding to the animal foods that has caused the increase in obesity and all of the obesity-related disease.

We started adding to the animal foods 2.4 million years ago.

Along with all of the non-foods out there that we've shoved down our gullets for decades.

What is a "non-food"?

If beef was the problem, we should be seeing all of the carnivores out there getting fatter and then dropping dead from heart attacks. Right?

All? No. Do all smokers die of lung cancer?
 
You can be healthy eating plants and other meats, yes.

You can be much healthier without the red meats.

So who's drawing the line on what's healthy enough to let poor people buy?

You?

And that line is is: it's healthy if it's associated with the highest cause of death nationally, but it has protein and zinc?
 

I wasn't the one who said 1950. I was talking about ancient humans who lived centuries ago.

When did I say they did?


Meanwhile...






Now show me a study where the participants ONLY ate meat for an extended period of time and how that affected their bodies. All of these studies show people eating not just meat, but also bread, mayo, ketchup, chips, french fries, pasta..............

They are bad for your health. No food is "the enemy" but conservatives want to declare some foods the enemy, while keeping the ones they find really tasty.

Ground beef isn't unhealthy when eaten all by itself. It's what we've added to it that makes the meal unhealthy.

We started adding to the animal foods 2.4 million years ago.

We didn't start adding non-foods full of sugar and seed oils 2.4 million years ago.

The most healthy diet is full of real food - animal protein, fruits, veggies, nuts.

What is a "non-food"?

"Foods" with zero nutritional value.

All? No. Do all smokers die of lung cancer?

Many have a lot of lung issues including cancer. So we should be seeing a lot of heart issues with carnivores, right? They should also be getting fatter and not thinner, right?
 
You can be much healthier without the red meats.

Nah. You can be just as healthy eating red meats (without all of the crap the standard American diet adds to it). Just like you can make a grilled chicken salad really unhealthy by adding croutons, deep fried toppings, creamy dressing, sugar-coated nuts, etc.

So who's drawing the line on what's healthy enough to let poor people buy?

You?


And that line is is: it's healthy if it's associated with the highest cause of death nationally, but it has protein and zinc?

I don't make government decisions because I'm not part of the administration. You?
 
You're the one who's gone on about it nonstop, so you tell me who has asked you to take offense in their stead.

“Who.”

Oh, they are people now to you?

Not crouch fruit?

I’m glad for that. We are making progress now.

Okay. I will, but you first.

Who do you think is helped by your insulting language?

That would be kind of weird. "What time am I picking you up from soccer practice crotch fruit?" doesn't really roll of the tongue too well.

Yeah, almost as weird as you calling anyone else that.
 
I wasn't the one who said 1950. I was talking about ancient humans who lived centuries ago.

Okay, and ancient humans who lived more than 10,000 years ago (people who lived just centuries ago were on t ancient humans, unless you are talking about a WHOLE lot of centuries) lived on both meat and foraging. In addition, the meat was wild game, not the fattened Kara nd we raise now.

Now show me a study where the participants ONLY ate meat for an extended period of time and how that affected their bodies.

How many people eat this way?

All of these studies show people eating not just meat, but also bread, mayo, ketchup, chips, french fries, pasta..............

All of which studies? Show me some.



Ground beef isn't unhealthy when eaten all by itself.

Yes. All by itself, it doesn't s pro-inflammatory and linked to CVD and cancer.

It's what we've added to it that makes the meal unhealthy.

Ground beef all by itself is unhealthy.

We didn't start adding non-foods full of sugar and seed oils 2.4 million years ago.

You were referring to "adding to" meat, were you not?

The most healthy diet is full of real food - animal protein, fruits, veggies, nuts.

Specific animal proteins. Limited fruits. More never non-starchy than starchy vegetables. Controlled portions of nuts.

"Foods" with zero nutritional value.

Like?

Many have a lot of lung issues including cancer.

What percentage?

Are there people who smoke who never get lung disease? Yes or no?

So we should be seeing a lot of heart issues with carnivores, right?

Probably. How many carnivores do you know? Any? And how long have they been carnivores?

They should also be getting fatter and not thinner, right?

I'm not sure, as I don't know any carnivores. Do you?

Meanwhile they f what you're saying is that meat eaters can be healthy if they only eat meat, are you proposing that good stamps only pay for meat? And if the when not way to be a healthy meat eater is to only eat meat, this s it really healthy? Is eating only meat sustainable?

What if there is no totally healthy or totally unhealthy food? What then? How do conservatives know what to let poor people buy in that case?
 
In 1950?



When did I say they did?

Meanwhile...





Thanks. It's almost midnight and I need to run out for burgers now.
 
Thats not what I did. Firat of all, the first post of yours I quoted is exactly what the left wants. Second, RFK jr is on the left, not the right. And third, there are lots of people on the right who defend and support the welfare state. Hope that helps
RFK Jr is on the left? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Jesus on a crutch your posts as stupider than usual. And that's saying something.
 
I call my daughters by their names.

Your obsession with the term is comical. I'm starting to think you feel some sort of accomplishment for being offended on behalf of those who I'm talking about with it.
But, at the end of the day, they're your crotch fruit. Own it.
 
Back
Top Bottom