themic
New member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2018
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 2
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
even if he DID do it, we are talking decades ago. The woman was 15 and illegally drinking. this means someone was breaking the law in having her drink. Who? She was. Funny how a woman gets to point a finger at the male all the time yet mask over their own actions.
Sex is always treated differently. For example, lets say he instead, stole something from her when she was 15. And the thing stolen was a nice watch, that she left on the top of his car, on purpose, while she went into a party.
well obviously, she herself wouldnt be too smart to leave a fancy watch on someone's car, and of course the person stealing it would be wrong as well. But no one would say, she was being smart by leaving it there on purpose.
Well lets throw in sex...a woman deliberately drinks till drunk...or might be dressed in a provocative way, with a bunch of boys.
She wasnt born yersterday. She had intent. If that intent didnt go asshe wanted, while doing something stupid, is it only the OTHERS that are to be held accountable?
Also, there is a lot of things being saif about science, and the mind. Well then that goes both ways. A MINOR is a MINOR...
the MINOR was drinking...if that minor picks up a gun and kills someone, we try them as adults, right?
Yet throw in sex, and suddenly she doesnt know what she was doing, and the MALE, despite drinking himself, "should have known better"
MALES dont get the benefit of the doubt for having the brain of a minor, when it comes to sex....JUST WOMEN
regarding "lost memory due to trauma"...
How do we convict people for sexual anything that left no dna? Because the person REPORTS THE CRIME ....and they dont wait 30 years!
Funny how they want to use "science" and assumed "fear" of EVERY woman, yet the male cant use science, to say, "we were minors, we were drunk, we didnt know what we were doing"
A Man is expected to Always know what he is doing, and the weak minded woman is a victim all the time.
Its just like the metoo women...Why is no one saying that there is such a thing as a low class, party woman that sleeps around? Why is no one bringing up that there are women that will see a man that can get them a "leg up" by putting their legs up?
there are most certainly casting couch women, looking to get ahead. If the directors havent given the path to fame to women that DID it, then they wouldnt offer it.
Sales come if there is a MARKET for it. so those women felt that sleeping around can get them places. And when it didnt, they suddenly want to dogpile on someone 40 years later?
they then run behind "being afraid" based on "science" of women that are not in the room at all. Ghost women. Based on a "science" claim that women will not tell of a rape. then they take that assumption and paint it on EACH case where the woman is making claims 40 years later.
How can that be?
Multiple women, unknown to one another...in varied environments, but powerful and forthright enough to go to college and become dr's or become actresses, were ALL afraid, but gained strength AT THE SAME TIME?
this, after bill clinton, Michael Jackson, Mike tyson, and many other powerful people had charges filed against them in the 90s till now....NONE of these women "found the strength" while they saw all these powerful people going down?
Suddenly, they now have it?
No....
these are casting couch women, who are mad because they didnt get something...
and this woman going after the judge, has a grudge. they always bring up ghost women, not in the trial...Claiming its about "all the women who are living with rape"
No its not...THIS MAN, doesnt represent "all me" just like that woman doesnt represent "all women"
A man in a trial or a hearing should not, and cannot be the poster child for "ghost citizens" and suddeny has to defend himself from people NOT in the room.
this holds true of bill cosby as well...who found himself fighting ghost women that have gone through similar things NOT with cosby....
Can you go back to your highschool days and remember being in a fight? well then you should lose your job, because thats illegal. Did you get high or smoke a cig BEFORE 21? then you should be seen as a delinquent. I dont care if your 60. And you should lose your job today.
any woman can now say, "he kissed me on the cheek when he greeted me in 1978 at studio54 while we were both dropping acid..." and suddenly the guy is a monster?
Now that we know who that man was that kissed the nurse in the popular ww2 picture, we can arrest him for forced kissing....
while we are at it, the family of Ray Charles needs to be sued for "Hit the road jack" and "baby its cold outside" because clearly he was unwilling to leave when asked, and he wouldnt let a woman leave when she asked cuz it was cold outside! LOL
Sex is always treated differently. For example, lets say he instead, stole something from her when she was 15. And the thing stolen was a nice watch, that she left on the top of his car, on purpose, while she went into a party.
well obviously, she herself wouldnt be too smart to leave a fancy watch on someone's car, and of course the person stealing it would be wrong as well. But no one would say, she was being smart by leaving it there on purpose.
Well lets throw in sex...a woman deliberately drinks till drunk...or might be dressed in a provocative way, with a bunch of boys.
She wasnt born yersterday. She had intent. If that intent didnt go asshe wanted, while doing something stupid, is it only the OTHERS that are to be held accountable?
Also, there is a lot of things being saif about science, and the mind. Well then that goes both ways. A MINOR is a MINOR...
the MINOR was drinking...if that minor picks up a gun and kills someone, we try them as adults, right?
Yet throw in sex, and suddenly she doesnt know what she was doing, and the MALE, despite drinking himself, "should have known better"
MALES dont get the benefit of the doubt for having the brain of a minor, when it comes to sex....JUST WOMEN
regarding "lost memory due to trauma"...
How do we convict people for sexual anything that left no dna? Because the person REPORTS THE CRIME ....and they dont wait 30 years!
Funny how they want to use "science" and assumed "fear" of EVERY woman, yet the male cant use science, to say, "we were minors, we were drunk, we didnt know what we were doing"
A Man is expected to Always know what he is doing, and the weak minded woman is a victim all the time.
Its just like the metoo women...Why is no one saying that there is such a thing as a low class, party woman that sleeps around? Why is no one bringing up that there are women that will see a man that can get them a "leg up" by putting their legs up?
there are most certainly casting couch women, looking to get ahead. If the directors havent given the path to fame to women that DID it, then they wouldnt offer it.
Sales come if there is a MARKET for it. so those women felt that sleeping around can get them places. And when it didnt, they suddenly want to dogpile on someone 40 years later?
they then run behind "being afraid" based on "science" of women that are not in the room at all. Ghost women. Based on a "science" claim that women will not tell of a rape. then they take that assumption and paint it on EACH case where the woman is making claims 40 years later.
How can that be?
Multiple women, unknown to one another...in varied environments, but powerful and forthright enough to go to college and become dr's or become actresses, were ALL afraid, but gained strength AT THE SAME TIME?
this, after bill clinton, Michael Jackson, Mike tyson, and many other powerful people had charges filed against them in the 90s till now....NONE of these women "found the strength" while they saw all these powerful people going down?
Suddenly, they now have it?
No....
these are casting couch women, who are mad because they didnt get something...
and this woman going after the judge, has a grudge. they always bring up ghost women, not in the trial...Claiming its about "all the women who are living with rape"
No its not...THIS MAN, doesnt represent "all me" just like that woman doesnt represent "all women"
A man in a trial or a hearing should not, and cannot be the poster child for "ghost citizens" and suddeny has to defend himself from people NOT in the room.
this holds true of bill cosby as well...who found himself fighting ghost women that have gone through similar things NOT with cosby....
Can you go back to your highschool days and remember being in a fight? well then you should lose your job, because thats illegal. Did you get high or smoke a cig BEFORE 21? then you should be seen as a delinquent. I dont care if your 60. And you should lose your job today.
any woman can now say, "he kissed me on the cheek when he greeted me in 1978 at studio54 while we were both dropping acid..." and suddenly the guy is a monster?
Now that we know who that man was that kissed the nurse in the popular ww2 picture, we can arrest him for forced kissing....
while we are at it, the family of Ray Charles needs to be sued for "Hit the road jack" and "baby its cold outside" because clearly he was unwilling to leave when asked, and he wouldnt let a woman leave when she asked cuz it was cold outside! LOL
