• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kary Mullis PhD : PCR Test Can Find "Almost Anything In Almost Anybody". The guy is Biochemist and the inventor of the PCR test

Any government can launch the second, third, fourth etc. Covid-1984 scamdemic just by the increasing of the amount of tests. Nice, isn't?

Kary Mullis, PhD in Biochemistry, saying that the PCR test (currently the main tool used globally to determine Covid-19 "postive" cases), can find "almost anything in almost anybody".
Biochemist Kary Mullis is the inventor of the PCR test and won the Nobel Prize in chemistry for his invention in 1993. Mullis stated in 2013 that PCR was never designed to diagnose disease. The test finds very small segments of a nucleic acid which are components of a virus. According to Mullis, having an actual infection is quite different than testing positive with PCR. According to Mullis, PCR is best used in medical laboratories and for research purposes.
Mullis has said: "PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins...".
Covid-19 cases are currently being being determined by a test that is scientifically meaningless, according to its own inventor


In other words, China flu Scamdemic is fake news,
https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/26/cdc-us-flu-deaths-winter/.
80,000 flu deaths, not make believe, died of heart attack China flu deaths.
No masks and shutdown then, hmmmmm.
 
I have no idea what you are talking about. Mullis said the PCR test was not intended for diagnosing infections. I have not said anything about outliers.

Intended or no it does diagnose infections in thousands of diseases. We've been using it broadly as a diagnostic tool for about two decades now, they didn't just make up this diagnostic method for this disease.

It's frankly amazing that you somehow became a PCR virus diagnostic skeptic because of your political views but that's about par for the course these days.
 
Last edited:
The news does not usually tell us the percentages. It tells us the NUMBERS. If there are more tests, the numbers are higher. But there could be the SAME number of actual cases, just that more are being counted.

For example, if there are two countries, A and B, and each have 10 million people. Country A tested 1,000 and country B only tested 500. A had 100 positive results, while B had 50 positive results. It SEEMS like country A had twice as many cases as B. but actually A did twice as many tests as B. A FOUND more cases, but it didn't necessarily have more cases.

The news doesn't usually tell us how many tests a country did, just the number of positive results.
Duh..so..that in no way invalidates the test. For one..if you want to evaluate two countries with disparate testing..then you take testing rates and testing criteria into account
And you look at positivity rates.
However.. if you want too look at how your area is doing one week vs another.. then you look at numbers and positivity rates.
These numbers are easy to find...heck my local news gives them.
In no way does anything you have said invalidate the real value of testing
 
Duh..so..that in no way invalidates the test. For one..if you want to evaluate two countries with disparate testing..then you take testing rates and testing criteria into account
And you look at positivity rates.
However.. if you want too look at how your area is doing one week vs another.. then you look at numbers and positivity rates.
These numbers are easy to find...heck my local news gives them.
In no way does anything you have said invalidate the real value of testing

I never tried to invalidate the value of testing!! I said giving only case numbers doesn't show if the pandemic is getting worse.

But the NYT, and other mainstream news is telling us there is a great surge. Even though death counts are not increasing, only cases. They only tell us case counts. They think we are really stupid.
 
I never tried to invalidate the value of testing!! I said giving only case numbers doesn't show if the pandemic is getting worse.

But the NYT, and other mainstream news is telling us there is a great surge. Even though death counts are not increasing, only cases. They only tell us case counts. They think we are really stupid.
Well.. giving only case numbers in the us? Yes.. it does show that the pandemic is getting worse. The testing conditions in the states are relatively the same in the state.
and the percentage of false positives are stable.
So yes.. its a sign that there is a surge happening.
Also.. death counts are pretty meaningless. First.. a death today.. could come from an infection a month ago (covid doesn;t generally kill instantly).

And the reality is that case counts will likely increase way ahead of death counts... because those infected today... the ones that die probably won;t die for weeks or months from now.

Secondly.. death counts are a poor indicator anyway because techniques for covid have improved. So fewer people who contract it are dying compared to before now that we know how to treat these patients better.

Now hospitalizations.. which the media gives.. and ICU numbers are important because it tells you the stress on the medical system
 
Well.. giving only case numbers in the us? Yes.. it does show that the pandemic is getting worse. The testing conditions in the states are relatively the same in the state.
and the percentage of false positives are stable.
So yes.. its a sign that there is a surge happening.
Also.. death counts are pretty meaningless. First.. a death today.. could come from an infection a month ago (covid doesn;t generally kill instantly).

And the reality is that case counts will likely increase way ahead of death counts... because those infected today... the ones that die probably won;t die for weeks or months from now.

Secondly.. death counts are a poor indicator anyway because techniques for covid have improved. So fewer people who contract it are dying compared to before now that we know how to treat these patients better.

Now hospitalizations.. which the media gives.. and ICU numbers are important because it tells you the stress on the medical system

The NYT finally explained it today -- more tests are being done so more cases are discovered. Maybe try reading it since you can't seem to understand anything I say.
 
The NYT finally explained it today -- more tests are being done so more cases are discovered. Maybe try reading it since you can't seem to understand anything I say.
Dude.. I fully understand it. Thats why NY positive rate.. is so low. Despite more cases. (remember when I explained positivity rates and testing?)
However, their testing has remained fairly stable for a while and they are starting to see their positivity increase and their number of cases increase which is indicative that they could be beginning a surge.
 
Despicable lies.


Kary Mullis had criticized the use of his PCR test for diagnosing HIV infection. It is not unthinkable that he would have also criticized its use in diagnosing COVID 19.
 
Keep in mind that our information is being screened by facebook, youtube, twitter, etc. If there are any problems with the official policies, they might be hidden from us.

One thing is an obvious fact, though -- more testing means more cases discovered. Does that mean we're having a "surge?" No, it won't mean anything unless serious cases and deaths also increase dramatically.
 
Keep in mind that our information is being screened by facebook, youtube, twitter, etc. If there are any problems with the official policies, they might be hidden from us.

One thing is an obvious fact, though -- more testing means more cases discovered. Does that mean we're having a "surge?" No, it won't mean anything unless serious cases and deaths also increase dramatically.
Wrong again.
1. Deaths will follow weeks or months after a surge...since death comes days weeks and months after infection
2. A surge can happen without serious cases depending on what populations experience an increase in infection. For example there can be a surge in cases as school children go back to school and get infected...but since they are young and healthy..serious cases do not rise.
 
Wrong again.
1. Deaths will follow weeks or months after a surge...since death comes days weeks and months after infection
2. A surge can happen without serious cases depending on what populations experience an increase in infection. For example there can be a surge in cases as school children go back to school and get infected...but since they are young and healthy..serious cases do not rise.

Not going around this circle with you again. So far no one knows if the increase in cases is meaningful or not.
 
Not going around this circle with you again. So far no one knows if the increase in cases is meaningful or not.
Actually yes they do know its meaningful.
 
Back
Top Bottom