• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Kamala's Been On A Drinking Binge Since Losing

sanman said:
Somebody's gotta talk about Kamala. You guys certainly never do. She ain't gettin any attention anymore.
You've all forgotten about her, discarded her like used toilet paper (because that's all she ever was for you)
Just like will happen to Biden after he's no longer in power
Click to expand...
So what?
Keep crying yourself to sleep every night.
You’ll need to get used to that.
 
sanman said:
Somebody's gotta talk about Kamala. You guys certainly never do. She ain't gettin any attention anymore.
You've all forgotten about her, discarded her like used toilet paper (because that's all she ever was for you)
Just like will happen to Biden after he's no longer in power
Click to expand...

Why?
The election is over and she lost.

Why do you care what she does now?
 
OpportunityCost said:
Russian collusion hoax has been proven and paying the FEC fines are evidence of such. Downer's recent agreement with Durham's version of events would indicate the FBI agent at the time (Strzok) made a statement that left out pertinent parts of Papadopoulos's conversation with Downer and made it appear Papadopoulos (why the hell can't his name be Smith) had some inside Russian information when he clearly did not.

Now we know the Dossier was a set-up, Downer and Papa was a set-up and Flynn was a set-up. Now, what does that indicate? Comey knew, Clapper knew, and most certainly Obama knew. He wasn't satisfied with using the FBI to mess with the campaign, he used them to mess with his entire Presidency by sidelining Flynn, who knew where the bodies were buried and messing with Sessions which sidelined his AG. Two people who could have sorted this pile of cards out and made them topple.

Transparency and disclosure, which we are getting know shows the FBI and DoJ to be corrupt as hell. Each new piece that drops just makes them look worse.
Click to expand...
Except none of this has anything to do with the comment about Democrats win by cheating.
 
Peter said:
Why?
The election is over and she lost.

Why do you care what she does now?
Click to expand...

Oh, she's the one who's always been the attention-seeker. It's not the other way around.
It's important to unearth the sheer corruption of the Democrat machine which elevated this thoroughly unqualified person for putting them on a pedestal to run the entire country.
 
sanman said:
Oh, she's the one who's always been the attention-seeker. It's not the other way around.
It's important to unearth the sheer corruption of the Democrat machine which elevated this thoroughly unqualified person for putting them on a pedestal to run the entire country.
Click to expand...

You seriously want to talk about being qualified when we all see the quality of the people Trump is picking for his cabinet?
 
Peter said:
You seriously want to talk about being qualified when we all see the quality of the people Trump is picking for his cabinet?
Click to expand...
I'd say it the other way around -- the Democrat Left are extremely hypocritical to be critiquing the qualifications of Trump's picks after fielding blither idiots like Kamala.
At least Trump's picks aren't babbling about "being unburdened by what has been"
 
ElChupacabra said:
Except none of this has anything to do with the comment about Democrats win by cheating.
Click to expand...
Why do you think that shit was floating around the FBI? That is cheating, because its manufactured, its lies. Obama knew it. Clinton knew it. Which is why the Clinton campaign used a cutout to make the payment.

Then they carried out a fake investigation because they knew long beforehand it was fake.
 
ElChupacabra said:
That wasn't during Obama's administration.
Click to expand...
The begginings of it were during the 2016 campaign even though the Mueller investigation came later. Lat time I checked Obama was still in office untile lat January 2017 and his justice depart was involved.
 
Jason Warfield said:
Sooo...now you all are not only dealing with ODS, HDS, BDS...now KDS (Kamala Derangement Syndrome)?
Click to expand...
Na

MAGAS still have a voodoo doll called Hillary they like to stick pins 📌

She lives rent free in MAGAS heads. How did that go locking her up in 2016? The cult bought that promise from Trump big time.
.
 
sanman said:
Oh, she's the one who's always been the attention-seeker. It's not the other way around.
It's important to unearth the sheer corruption of the Democrat machine which elevated this thoroughly unqualified person for putting them on a pedestal to run the entire country.
Click to expand...
Projection is a powerful thing.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Why do you think that shit was floating around the FBI? That is cheating, because its manufactured, its lies. Obama knew it. Clinton knew it. Which is why the Clinton campaign used a cutout to make the payment.

Then they carried out a fake investigation because they knew long beforehand it was fake.
Click to expand...
You're moving the goal posts. First, you started with Democrats winning only via cheating, but the investigations into Trump were after he had already won. Much of the election fraud claims came during elections, when there was something to win. So by your same logic, the efforts to smear Obama and Clinton by claiming one of them wasn't born in the US and the other was a crook were also the same "cheating", yes? If so, then you'd have to expand the people under this cheating umbrella.
 
MAGAnificent said:
The begginings of it were during the 2016 campaign even though the Mueller investigation came later. Lat time I checked Obama was still in office untile lat January 2017 and his justice depart was involved.
Click to expand...
So the Trump led DOJ decided to continue it, yes?
 
sanman said:
I wouldn't know -- unlike you, I don't have a fetish for talking about kiddie porn and staying in the know about it, as you seem to

I see that NeCons and Israel lobby don't like Scott Ritter for being outspoken on their corruption, and so they'd have a strong motive to smear him.
He is widely respected for his analysis and commentary. He's a brilliant fellow who gets invited to speak for good reason.
Click to expand...
So transparent, Russian pederast defender.
 
ElChupacabra said:
You're moving the goal posts. First, you started with Democrats winning only via cheating, but the investigations into Trump were after he had already won. Much of the election fraud claims came during elections, when there was something to win. So by your same logic, the efforts to smear Obama and Clinton by claiming one of them wasn't born in the US and the other was a crook were also the same "cheating", yes? If so, then you'd have to expand the people under this cheating umbrella.
Click to expand...
Cute. The Clinton plan was to bring the investigation into the open before the election. You do know that, correct?
 
Peter said:
You seriously want to talk about being qualified when we all see the quality of the people Trump is picking for his cabinet?
Click to expand...
All excellent picks so far.
 
ElChupacabra said:
The US just elected a convicted criminal as president. Harris giving a speech fully drunk is less embarrassing, since she isn't president.
Click to expand...
You might be able to tell she was intoxicated by her manner of speech. Judging from content of speech, she's been drunk a long time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom