• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Kamala is Asked a Taboo Question

I think Nixon did so to avoid criminal charges...please explain how they are similar? Oh, and the proof that I asked for for Biden.

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
Pelosi forced him out thats why she and Biden arent speaking. She said 'we can do it the easy way or the hard way.' But believe what you want
 
Pelosi forced him out thats why she and Biden arent speaking. She said 'we can do it the easy way or the hard way.' But believe what you want

You can type it all day long, where's the proof? Your fantasies arent debate.

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
 
Your logic says that if Biden, rather than stepping down, had died, the Democratic party should not be allowed to field a candidate because the primaries were already over. If you think I'm wrong, please explain how the Democratic party should proceed in that scenario.
Not any more than your logic says that if the Alien had burst out of Biden's stomach, then it could have become the new Democrat presidential candidate in Biden's place.
 
You literally give Trump a pass on everything, it doesn't matter if it's January 6th or grabbing ******s or talking about another man's dick or stealing our national secrets. But you push shit like this. It's propaganda.

You give your precious NeoCons a pass on everything, including when NeoCon Nuland did a January 6 in Kyiv's maidan in 2014 (something that did actually unconstitutionally overthrow an elected govt)
Whatever talk you're fretting about, it didn't dissuade voters in 2016.
I don't see what national secrets have been stolen, which you're referring to.
It's propaganda.
 
Not any more than your logic says that if the Alien had burst out of Biden's stomach, then it could have become the new Democrat presidential candidate in Biden's place.
Please answer the question. If Biden had died after the primaries, how should the Democratic party have proceeded? What would have been a fair way for them to field a candidate for president?
 
Please answer the question. If Biden had died after the primaries, how should the Democratic party have proceeded? What would have been a fair way for them to field a candidate for president?
But Biden didn't die -- he withdrew -- and he didn't have to withdraw. It's OBAMA and PELOSI who FORCED him to withdraw.
Who the hell is OBAMA to force anyone to withdraw? How many delegates does he have?
 

Kamala is Asked a Taboo Question

Biden stepped down. I wondered if we'd have a competition for the nomination at the convention. A couple hours later, Biden endorsed Harris. Biden had won the primary, and now he passed his win onto his running mate Harris. The question was answered. Dems overwhelmingly supported Biden's decision and his choice. Trump and his MAGAs collectively said, "Oh ****!" Tough shit, MAGAs. The Dems now have a normal, healthy, coherent, intelligent, and sane candidate -- everything that Trump IS NOT.
 
Biden stepped down. I wondered if we'd have a competition for the nomination at the convention. A couple hours later, Biden endorsed Harris. Biden had won the primary, and now he passed his win onto his running mate Harris. The question was answered. Dems overwhelmingly supported Biden's decision and his choice. Trump and his MAGAs collectively said, "Oh ****!" Tough shit, MAGAs. The Dems now have a normal, healthy, coherent, intelligent, and sane candidate -- everything that Trump IS NOT.

No, no -- Biden didn't just whimsically withdraw and endorse Kamala -- he was INVOLUNTARILY FORCED to do so.
So it then begs the question of WHO COERCED him into doing this, and why? And how come ordinary voters had no say?
 
Please answer the question. If Biden had died after the primaries, how should the Democratic party have proceeded? What would have been a fair way for them to field a candidate for president?
If Biden had died after the primary. then how would he be able to endorse Kamala? Thru necromancy?

According to Kamala's own answer shown in OP, it's Dick Cheney's endorsement of her that gets mention and matters more.
 
But Biden didn't die -- he withdrew -- and he didn't have to withdraw. It's OBAMA and PELOSI who FORCED him to withdraw.
Who the hell is OBAMA to force anyone to withdraw? How many delegates does he have?
Please answer the question. If Biden had died after the primaries, how should the Democratic party have proceeded? What would have been a fair way for them to field a candidate for president?
 
No, no -- Biden didn't just whimsically withdraw and endorse Kamala -- he was INVOLUNTARILY FORCED to do so.
So it then begs the question of WHO COERCED him into doing this, and why? And how come ordinary voters had no say?
Please provide evidence. Otherwise, this is just nonsense.
 
She is the Democratic candidate. The only people who have protested her candidacy are the MAGA supporters. I wonder why? Maybe because she is stomping Trump's saggy ass?

We have a candidate that we are happy with, and it is none of your MAGA business.
 
She is the Democratic candidate. The only people who have protested her candidacy are the MAGA supporters. I wonder why? Maybe because she is stomping Trump's saggy ass?

We have a candidate that we are happy with, and it is none of your MAGA business.
She is the candidate of the Democratic Party because that party doesn't even represent its erstwhile voters anymore.
That's why those voters are now fleeing that party in droves -- something which will be proven in the November election.
 
She is the candidate of the Democratic Party because that party doesn't even represent its erstwhile voters anymore.
That's why those voters are now fleeing that party in droves -- something which will be proven in the November election.


She is our candidate. We are happy with her. She seems to be doing very well.

Not your MAGA business.
 
No, no -- Biden didn't just whimsically withdraw and endorse Kamala -- he was INVOLUNTARILY FORCED to do so.
So it then begs the question of WHO COERCED him into doing this, and why? And how come ordinary voters had no say?

Citations for the bold? You've been asked already.

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
 
He did step down voluntarily. Where is ANY proof he was forced? I'm sure people brought him the data, the polls, the public perceptions that dropped after the June debate. He said in 2019 he'd be willing to do one term. When they showed him Harris would have a better chance...he did the right thing for the country. What would his legacy have looked like if he ran and lost in 2024?

Her name was on the ballot that earned that 14 million extra votes too. And we all knew that a 78 yr old candidate meant a realistic chance of her becoming POTUS...maybe some bitter people cant connect those dots...but it's a fact.

I am enjoying the 🍋🍇 a great deal tho 😁 And the fact that people obviously just swallow that BS whole. I'm sure they're laughing all the way to the bank.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
And they're bitter because it looked easier to beat Biden. Not so with Harris. They complain there was no open primary and the Dems - who've all happily endorsed Harris - were somehow robbed of a choice, when its MAGA who want to choose their own opponent.

Such crybabies.
 
And yet you produce nothing...and since July, no one else has either.

But you believe it anyway, right? Seems like you dont have very high standards for credibility.

☮️ 🇺🇸☮️
You guys were the ones screaming "Biden FOREVAAH! Best Candidate EVAAHH!"

Now you're like "Biden? Biden who?"

You couldn't broadcast your cynical hypocrisy more loudly.

Why would I find you credible in judging anyone's credibility?
 
You guys were the ones screaming "Biden FOREVAAH! Best Candidate EVAAHH!"

Now you're like "Biden? Biden who?"

You couldn't broadcast your cynical hypocrisy more loudly.

Why would I find you credible in judging anyone's credibility?

Dont you even read your own thread? Asked and answered:

It's called political strategy and it worked very well. And was all perfectly acceptable procedure. The complaints are just 🍋🍇 And I dont see many Democrats complaining, do you? Biden and the party choosing the best chance to retain the WH? That IS their job, and seems like people are onboard.​
The timing waited until after the June debate when there was some pretty serious data and public perception had gotten negative. So: time it to steal DonOld's thunder immediately after the RNC convention and he'd already picked his VP. Let's face it...DonOld thought he had it won...and this knocked him...and his followers...on his/their asses. The rage from both hasnt stopped since :D It totally threw DonOld's campaign off-track. (y) Mission accomplished. Now we just hope it was enough.​

Now...that's street cred....

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
 
You guys were the ones screaming "Biden FOREVAAH! Best Candidate EVAAHH!"

Now you're like "Biden? Biden who?"

You couldn't broadcast your cynical hypocrisy more loudly.

And then there's this, you missed this too? Or just blocked it out? 😄

Here's this, again posted BEFORE he stepped down:

The key thing tho, is he/the party cannot let on for a second, not the slightest, that he's not 100% committed because if he shows the slightest doubt...then you you have someone that appears they're not 100% committed to being POTUS. And people arent going to vote for someone that's not totally committed.
So he'll be 100% "the guy" until...he's not.​

--and--

He cant just say, "hey, if so and so wants to run, I can get behind that." He cant say, "well who else do you have?"​
Because just by saying those things...he shows he'd be willing to walk away...which HE CANNOT DO if he wants to win. He has to show 100% commitment.
Right up until he/the party decide someone else should run, if they do.​

--and--

It's strategy. In anything, business, politics, war, when you strategize, do you tell your competition everything? Do you hold back critical info? Do you show "ambiguity?" Do you open yourself up to questioning? Do you show weakness?​
He needs to campaign right up until he/the party decides otherwise.

Get it now?


☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
And then there's this, you missed this too? Or just blocked it out? 😄

Here's this, again posted BEFORE he stepped down:

The key thing tho, is he/the party cannot let on for a second, not the slightest, that he's not 100% committed because if he shows the slightest doubt...then you you have someone that appears they're not 100% committed to being POTUS. And people arent going to vote for someone that's not totally committed.
So he'll be 100% "the guy" until...he's not.​

--and--

He cant just say, "hey, if so and so wants to run, I can get behind that." He cant say, "well who else do you have?"​
Because just by saying those things...he shows he'd be willing to walk away...which HE CANNOT DO if he wants to win. He has to show 100% commitment.
Right up until he/the party decide someone else should run, if they do.​

--and--

It's strategy. In anything, business, politics, war, when you strategize, do you tell your competition everything? Do you hold back critical info? Do you show "ambiguity?" Do you open yourself up to questioning? Do you show weakness?​
He needs to campaign right up until he/the party decides otherwise.

Get it now?


☮️🇺🇸☮️
He didn’t “step down”

Americans are smarter than the Democrats. They see right through their smoke and mirrors.
 
Back
Top Bottom