• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Kamala is Asked a Taboo Question

If the Dems are OK with it why are you so upset? You got your pick, pathetic as he is.
The Democrats have shown how rigged their process is.

If you want a 2-party system, then how acceptable is it to nakedly rig one of those parties?

Your response indicates that you're fine with rigging the political process.
Why are you fine with that?
How is that democracy in your eyes, to herd the people towards a narrow rigged choice of candidates?
 
Which proves that it does not matter how she answered, your decision was made long before the question was even asked.

Not a taboo question, was answered well.

The fact remains that Biden stepped down on his own accord, baited into doing so by Trump, endorsed Harris, who by convention broker secured the nomination, now has overwhelming base support from the party, leaving Trump as the old man on stage often babbling about whatever he wants to including the junk size of dead golfers.

All you guys have left is insults, hatred, bouts of both vote buying and voter intimidation, and a doom and gloom outlook on everything.

You're openly supporting a rigged political process. This tells me you don't believe in democracy.
What you want is Machine Politics, which is corrupt and anti-democratic. How shameful.

She doesn't answer any question well. You're slavishly toadying for an idiot, foolishly believing you can shove your idiot down everyone's throats.
 
The Democrats have shown how rigged their process is.

If you want a 2-party system, then how acceptable is it to nakedly rig one of those parties?

Your response indicates that you're fine with rigging the political process.
Why are you fine with that?
How is that democracy in your eyes, to herd the people towards a narrow rigged choice of candidates?
It's not rigged. It was an exceptional circumstance with an exceptional outcome. The primaries were over, Biden won with the knowledge Harris was his running mate. I'm willing to bet that if something happened to Trump you would be OK with Vance as the candidate.
 
She's beating trump, that's the big deal. With Biden running they thought for sure they would win, now they know they are in for a loss, that's the difference.

That's what your side said about Hillary. "Oh, she's beating Trump, she's a shoo-in" etc
Reality showed otherwise. The polls were not accurately reflecting popular sentiment.
People know she's an idiot. Her mental feebleness is impossible to hide.
 
You're openly supporting a rigged political process. This tells me you don't believe in democracy.
What you want is Machine Politics, which is corrupt and anti-democratic. How shameful.

She doesn't answer any question well. You're slavishly toadying for an idiot, foolishly believing you can shove your idiot down everyone's throats.

It was not rigged nor was it anti-democracy, that is just more right wing lies about what happened. The truth of the matter is the Republican strategy when it was Biden vs Trump backfired, now you have Harris vs Trump and she is doing far better than the opposition expected.

The more you call her an idiot the more it is clear she is getting the better of you, and when you get down to it she is getting the better of Trump as well.
 
The Democrats have shown how rigged their process is.

If you want a 2-party system, then how acceptable is it to nakedly rig one of those parties?

Your response indicates that you're fine with rigging the political process.
Why are you fine with that?
How is that democracy in your eyes, to herd the people towards a narrow rigged choice of candidates?
The RNC uses the SAME process for a candidate that withdraws. Be less gullible
 
That's what your side said about Hillary. "Oh, she's beating Trump, she's a shoo-in" etc
Reality showed otherwise. The polls were not accurately reflecting popular sentiment.
People know she's an idiot. Her mental feebleness is impossible to hide.
This isn't then and we now know a whole bunch more about trump than we did almost ten years ago. Trump is a loser and he's going to lose this election and blame cheating. I know it, you know it, we all know it.
 
People know she's an idiot. Her mental feebleness is impossible to hide.
Agreement there.

 
It's not rigged. It was an exceptional circumstance with an exceptional outcome. The primaries were over, Biden won with the knowledge Harris was his running mate. I'm willing to bet that if something happened to Trump you would be OK with Vance as the candidate.

Exceptional because an exceptionally corrupt party had allowed cronyists and donors to install an exceptionally senile old man into the Oval Office.
That then produced an exceptional crisis where the exceptionally senile old man couldn't even function in a debate, and looked exceptionally demented, triggering exceptional horror among the donors.
This then led to an exceptionally rigged solution of cronies & donors coronating Kamala as the new queen, without even soliciting the input of Democrat voters. That's not democracy, that's cronyism - which you seem to be fine with.
 
Exceptional because an exceptionally corrupt party had allowed cronyists and donors to install an exceptionally senile old man into the Oval Office.
That then produced an exceptional crisis where the exceptionally senile old man couldn't even function in a debate, and looked exceptionally demented, triggering exceptional horror among the donors.
This then led to an exceptionally rigged solution of cronies & donors coronating Kamala as the new queen, without even soliciting the input of Democrat voters. That's not democracy, that's cronyism - which you seem to be fine with.
Oh OK......BTW do you ghost write for Trump?
 
Exceptional because an exceptionally corrupt party had allowed cronyists and donors to install an exceptionally senile old man into the Oval Office.
That then produced an exceptional crisis where the exceptionally senile old man couldn't even function in a debate, and looked exceptionally demented, triggering exceptional horror among the donors.
This then led to an exceptionally rigged solution of cronies & donors coronating Kamala as the new queen, without even soliciting the input of Democrat voters. That's not democracy, that's cronyism - which you seem to be fine with.

Is this your response to pointing out that you don't know shit about the nomination process for a candidate?
 
They asked her how she became the Democrat nominee without having run as a candidate or received any votes for doing so.

She of course responds with babble -- because she didn't have an answer. She said that people from all over "including Dick Cheney" even endorsed her.

So Dick Cheney's endorsement is apparently what Kamala cites as her validation.



I'm pretty sure nobody from the Left liked or used to take endorsements from Dick Cheney -- but apparently for the new "Liberals" (eg. Kamala) this is now important

Meet the new warmongering Woke Left -- who look nothing like the old Left.
Harris has had many endorsements from conservatives sick to death of Trump's incompetence, lies, bullshit and rapidly diminishing mental capacity. Some Republicans clearly have a conscience and a sense of responsibility and integrity and fear for America's future if that useless, self-serving clown gets the job again.



 
They asked her how she became the Democrat nominee without having run as a candidate or received any votes for doing so.

She won the delegates after Biden dropped out. Candidates become the party candidate at the convention.

She acquired the votes in advance.
 
He did step down voluntarily. Where is ANY proof he was forced? I'm sure people brought him the data, the polls, the public perceptions that dropped after the June debate. He said in 2019 he'd be willing to do one term. When they showed him Harris would have a better chance...he did the right thing for the country. What would his legacy have looked like if he ran and lost in 2024?

Her name was on the ballot that earned that 14 million extra votes too. And we all knew that a 78 yr old candidate meant a realistic chance of her becoming POTUS...maybe some bitter people cant connect those dots...but it's a fact.

I am enjoying the 🍋🍇 a great deal tho 😁 And the fact that people obviously just swallow that BS whole. I'm sure they're laughing all the way to the bank.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
From the Bolded above. Vice President Harris' name was not on any primary ballot that I could find (only looked at Pennsylvania and Washington).
 
She won the delegates after Biden dropped out. Candidates become the party candidate at the convention.

She acquired the votes in advance.

You mean like a brokered convention? Who did the brokering, where and when?

If those delegates were Biden's, when why was he arm-twisted and forced to give them up?
 
You're openly supporting a rigged political process. This tells me you don't believe in democracy.
What you want is Machine Politics, which is corrupt and anti-democratic. How shameful.

She doesn't answer any question well. You're slavishly toadying for an idiot, foolishly believing you can shove your idiot down everyone's throats.

You ok with Musk buying votes?
 
The Democrats have shown how rigged their process is.

Lol. Rigged? Trump didn't even have to appear onstage for the Republican televised debates.

Why not?

Because it was only a dog and pony show. Trump was guaranteed the Republican nonination.

To make sure, Trump made his daughter-in-law Lara Trump the RNC co-chair.

Talk about rigged!
 
The Democrats have shown how rigged their process is.

Where? Cited examples please.

If you want a 2-party system, then how acceptable is it to nakedly rig one of those parties?

Your response indicates that you're fine with rigging the political process.
Why are you fine with that?
How is that democracy in your eyes, to herd the people towards a narrow rigged choice of candidates?

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
 
From the Bolded above. Vice President Harris' name was not on any primary ballot that I could find (only looked at Pennsylvania and Washington).

Who said primary? I didnt respond to that. "From the bolded" that 14 million extra votes was the general election. Can you respond to my post directly, as it stands (and is factual)? In that context, no primary voting matters.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
Last edited:
She’s a liar.

Just a quick, fun drive-by:

Here's a short list of outrageous and fearmongering lies. Remember after somebody tried to kill him, both sides were going to tone down the rhetoric? I guess he forgot.

--"they've created the worst economy in the history of America. Vote for her and we'll have another Great Depression!"​
--"Vote for her and it will be WW3 over the Ukraine!"​
--"Vote for her and illegals from insane asylums and jails will be here killing and raping!"​
--"They're eating peoples' pets!"​
--"Children leave for school in the morning and come home with sex change operations!"​
--"They want to be able to execute newborn babies!"​
--She's a Marxist!
-- Every job produced in this country over the last two years has gone to illegal aliens. Every job.
--"Biden sent all the FEMA $$ to illegals!"
--"They are only sending FEMA $$ to blue counties!"

It seems there is one category where DonOld beats Harris 😁

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
 
Jimmy Dore is the man!
 
He did step down voluntarily. Where is ANY proof he was forced? I'm sure people brought him the data, the polls, the public perceptions that dropped after the June debate. He said in 2019 he'd be willing to do one term. When they showed him Harris would have a better chance...he did the right thing for the country. What would his legacy have looked like if he ran and lost in 2024?

Her name was on the ballot that earned that 14 million extra votes too. And we all knew that a 78 yr old candidate meant a realistic chance of her becoming POTUS...maybe some bitter people cant connect those dots...but it's a fact.

I am enjoying the 🍋🍇 a great deal tho 😁 And the fact that people obviously just swallow that BS whole. I'm sure they're laughing all the way to the bank.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
Nobody believes he stepped down voluntarily. Remember when he said this?

Joe Biden said only God could get him to drop out of the presidential race
 
It's called political strategy and it worked very well. And was all perfectly acceptable procedure. The complaints are just 🍋🍇 And I dont see many Democrats complaining, do you? Biden and the party choosing the best chance to retain the WH? That IS their job, and seems like people are onboard.

The timing waited until after the June debate when there was some pretty serious data and public perception had gotten negative. So: time it to steal DonOld's thunder immediately after the RNC convention and he'd already picked his VP. Let's face it...DonOld thought he had it won...and this knocked him...and his followers...on his/their asses. The rage from both hasnt stopped since :D It totally threw DonOld's campaign off-track. (y) Mission accomplished. Now we just hope it was enough.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
Letting the elites in your party pick the nominee after Biden was forced out by Obama, Pelosi and Harris with the threat of the 25 ammendment is a perfectly acceptable procedure?

For where? Venezuela?
 
Back
Top Bottom