Justice Roberts calls the provisions of Obamacare for what they Constitutionally are

[haymarket]

Re: Justice Roberts calls the provisions of Obamacare for what they Constitutionally

You said "The Court decided the election". They didn't. I was correcting the record. If your point was solely about electoral college vs. popular vote, you should have contained your comments to those two topics alone.

So tell us who did decide the 2000 election then?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), is the United States Supreme Court decision that effectively resolved the dispute surrounding the 2000 presidential election in favor of George W. Bush. Only eight days earlier, the United States Supreme Court had unanimously decided the closely related case of Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, 531 U.S. 70 (2000), and only three days earlier, had preliminarily halted the recount that was occurring in Florida.
In a per curiam decision, the Court ruled that the Florida Supreme Court's method for recounting ballots was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The reason for this was the lack of equal treatment of all the ballots cast in Florida. The Court also ruled that no alternative method could be established within the time limits set by Title 3 of the United States Code (3 U.S.C.), § 5 (Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors), which is December 12. Three concurring justices also asserted that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II, § 1, cl. 2 of the Constitution, by misinterpreting Florida election law that had been enacted by the Florida Legislature.

The decision allowed Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris's previous certification of George W. Bush as the winner of Florida's 25 electoral votes to stand. Florida's votes gave Bush, the Republican candidate, 271 electoral votes, one more than the required 270 electoral votes to win the Electoral College and defeat Democratic candidate Al Gore, who received 266 electoral votes (a District of Columbia elector abstained).

 

[haymarket]

Re: Justice Roberts calls the provisions of Obamacare for what they Constitutionally

Is it safe to say then that you could not care less about checks and balances, or the way government decides to govern?

What does that even mean? Your 'statement' makes no sense paired with the quote from me that precedes it.