• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justice Department will launch civil rights review into 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre

zincwarrior

Dog Food and Belly Rub Distribution Specialist
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
13,348
Reaction score
10,279
Location
Central Texas
Justice Department announces review of the 1921 Tulsa Massacre (note same time period as "killers of the Flower Moon" in the same state). I kind of get it, but I also don't. Its been 103 years. Everyone is dead. Evidence is going to be scant, and costs material.

Oklahoma CityAP —
The Justice Department announced Monday it plans to launch a review of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, an attack by a white mob on a thriving Black district that is considered one of the worst single acts of violence against Black people in U.S. history.

The review was launched under a federal cold-case initiative that has led to prosecutions of some Civil Rights Era cases, although Assistant U.S. Attorney General Kristen Clarke said they have “no expectation” there is anyone living who could be prosecuted as a result of the inquiry. Still, the announcement of a first-ever federal probe into the massacre was embraced by descendants of survivors who have long criticized city and state leaders for not doing more to compensate those affected by the attack.

Clarke said the agency plans to issue a public report detailing its findings by the end of the year.




Onlookers watch as a fire erupts during the Tulsa race massacre in 1921.
Related articleA century after the Tulsa race massacre, ‘you still have a community that’s struggling’
“We acknowledge descendants of the survivors, and the victims continue to bear the trauma of this act of racial terrorism,” Clarke said during her remarks in Washington.

Damario Solomon-Simmons, an attorney for the last known survivors of the massacre, 110-year-old Viola Fletcher and 109-year-old Lessie Benningfield Randle, described Clarke’s announcement as a “joyous occasion.”

“It is about time,” said Solomon-Simmons, flanked by descendants of massacre survivors. “It only took 103 years, but this is a joyous occasion, a momentous day, an amazing opportunity for us to make sure that what happened here in Tulsa is understood for what it was — the largest crime scene in the history of this country.”

As many as 300 Black people were killed; more than 1,200 homes, businesses, schools and churches were destroyed; and thousands were forced into internment camps overseen by the National Guard when a white mob, including some deputized by authorities, looted and burned the Greenwood District, also known as Black Wall Street.
 
They've already dug up bodies and done a lot of forensic research but you don't hear anything about the results. Could they be underwhelming? I'm curious myself and hope that they can produce a definitive report.
 
This has been studied and investigated to. death. I guess there are people at the DOJ who need to justify their employment by flogging the fossils.
 
Justice Department announces review of the 1921 Tulsa Massacre (note same time period as "killers of the Flower Moon" in the same state).

I kind of get it, but I also don't. Its been 103 years. Everyone is dead. Evidence is going to be scant, and costs material.
It is nothing but political posturing, pointless pandering, to curry favor of a voter demographic, one which the Democrats have been losing ground with as of late.

Expect a Harris / Walz campaign ad where they take credit for this for the same political purposes and political motivations.

Cynical politics at it's best.

 
Justice Department announces review of the 1921 Tulsa Massacre (note same time period as "killers of the Flower Moon" in the same state). I kind of get it, but I also don't. Its been 103 years. Everyone is dead. Evidence is going to be scant, and costs material.

What an incredible waste of time and resources by our government. Diverting resources from active cases and unsolved crimes.

This type of historical study would be better conducted as a university exercise, as it will largely be a review of historical documents.
 
Oklahoma Republicans would love to suppress this story forever.
 
What an incredible waste of time and resources by our government. Diverting resources from active cases and unsolved crimes.

This type of historical study would be better conducted as a university exercise, as it will largely be a review of historical documents.
Agreed. That the race baiters and reparations demanders in the DOJ have pushed the DOJ to take this on is another example of how politicized the DOJ has become.
 
Agreed. That the race baiters and reparations demanders in the DOJ have pushed the DOJ to take this on is another example of how politicized the DOJ has become.

Why shouldn't there be reparations for those families whose wealth was stolen from them due to the race riot?
 
I'm just looking for a true accounting of what actually happened backed by objective forensic evidence. Taxpayers have already paid for this. Just produce the final report.
 
Agreed. That the race baiters and reparations demanders in the DOJ have pushed the DOJ to take this on is another example of how politicized the DOJ has become.
Evidence that the DOJ Civil Rigths Division is overstaffed and looking to justify their existence.
 
Evidence that the DOJ Civil Rigths Division is overstaffed and looking to justify their existence.
I haven't heard any recommendations for staffing cuts at the DOJ Civil Rigths Division.
What have you heard?
 
I haven't heard any recommendations for staffing cuts at the DOJ Civil Rigths Division.
What have you heard?
Not so far.

My experience with them has been twice with the Voting Rights section and once with the Disability Rights section.

Voting rights said that my county was keeping Navajos from voting. The facts were that 50% of eligible whites in the county were voting, while 80% of eligible Navajos in the county were voting. When I pointed this out and asked to see ANY evidence that we were doing anything wrong, their response was "We will only present our evidence in court and, as you know, litigation is very expensive." We decided to bear the expense. DOJ ran up the white flag halfway through their own case, and retreated to Washington. Their "Point Woman" was transferred to a position which a former Fed friend of mine, when he got done laughing, described as "SIBERIA".

Their next foray into my territory resulted in their ignominious retreat before even filing in court, and one of their OLFs (obnoxious little feds) losing her job.

When the Disability Rights section was demanding preposterous modifications to our streets to make them wheelchair friendly, in a hilly section of town where that was impossible, I contacted their counsel. I asked him if my old nemesis from Voting Rights still worked there. He said yes. I asked him to say "Hi" for me. A couple days later Disability contacted us to tell us that they would be happy to accept the offer we had made them. I thought it was pretty satisfying that I had intimidated them by dropping My Own name!

This made me 3 for 3 in contests with them. I have yet to see any Reasonable demands they have made on any of my local government clients.
 
Back
Top Bottom