• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files

gbg3 said:
No kidding. @Chomsky rapid firing strongly worded posts and not one single mention of Biden or Biden's DOJ not touching a release of these files for 4 years. Yet now Trump "is protecting them". Biden's inaction with any transparency or any accountability is simply and conveniently erased from the entire conversation.
Click to expand...
There's a simple way to deal with this.

Look at the files NOW, and arrest anyone who's culpable, regardless of who they are.

Or is prosecuting pedophiles bad when it's politically inconvenient?
 
gbg3 said:
No kidding. @Chomsky rapid firing strongly worded posts and not one single mention of Biden or Biden's DOJ not touching a release of these files for 4 years. Yet now Trump "is protecting them". Biden's inaction with any transparency or any accountability is simply and conveniently erased from the entire conversation.
Click to expand...
Biden never suggested a " list " and never promised to release the files. He in no way suggested that Trump was implicated nor that there was any cover up.. Trump did. You can spin it from six ways to Sunday but this mess is 100% Trump's.
 
jaypatriot said:
Actually, I am protecting any dumb bastard who thought it a good idea to go to Epstein's island and not considering the possibility there would gullible bloggers hungry for a juicy story about rich and famous caught with their pants down.
This is what I asked:
Don't you think evidence should be present before a president is found guilty (in public opinion) of being a pedophile or covering up for others?

Are you one of those ready to convict ANYONE who went to Epstein's island to hobnob with the rich and famous AND DID NOT CAVORT WITH UNDERAGE GIRLS?
Click to expand...

This isn't about "evidence presented". This is about Trump protecting those in the files (whether him or not). That's the problem.

And yes - when someone acts in a guilty manner, it does lead others to suspect they're guilty.

The DOJ recently said there were 1,000 victims. Think about that. 1,000 victims, children who were groomed, procured, perhaps enslaved, transported, taken car of, and Trump tells us there is no criminals actions. Do you honestly believe this could have occurred without assistance?

jaypatriot said:
Chomsky,
Take a wild guess as to why the Biden Administration which had the Epstein files in its possession chose to NOT release those files to the public.
What were they hiding then?
Click to expand...

Why do you default to "Whataboutism'? Have you considered that perhaps there's some names in those files that Biden and the Dem Administration may not want out in the public? Look how hard Trump is fighting to keep his name suppressed?
 
Chomsky said:
But the overarching point is he's protecting them. That's the sick shyte.
Click to expand...

Chomsky said:
Have you considered that perhaps there's some names in those files that Biden and the Dem Administration may not want out in the public?
Click to expand...

Is what you said in the second quote "sick shyte" too, Chomsky? If not, why not?
 
gbg3 said:
No kidding. @Chomsky rapid firing strongly worded posts and not one single mention of Biden or Biden's DOJ not touching a release of these files for 4 years. Yet now Trump "is protecting them". Biden's inaction with any transparency or any accountability is simply and conveniently erased from the entire conversation.
Click to expand...

Alright, I'll try and be more measured in my posts. But it is not easy, given what's occurring. However, pedophilia is not "strongly worded". It is accurately descriptive.

To respond to your post:

1] We never before knew there was a list, nor 1,000 victims, nor that there was testimony the Grand Jury did not hear, nor that there were "tens of thousands of videos". Nor did the previous Administration declare "no criminal evidence - Dem hoax".

None of these revelations as to the huge scope of this ring became known, until just recently. And only recently were we told "nothing here to see" (except 1000 child victims, it seems).

2] Given what we now know, what makes you think the Biden Administration wasn't also suppressing individuals named in the files? They might be just as dirty, at least in terms of protecting those in the files.
 
gbg3 said:
Is what you said in the second quote "sick shyte" too, Chomsky? If not, why not?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what you're getting at here? In going after me, for Biden?

The subject is Trump, and his protecting his pedo buddy's associates - including himself.
 
Callen said:
Biden never suggested a " list " and never promised to release the files. He in no way suggested that Trump was implicated nor that there was any cover up.. Trump did. You can spin it from six ways to Sunday but this mess is 100% Trump's.
Click to expand...

Two other important points.

1] We didn't know until just recently there were 1,000 victims!

2] Biden did not declare "no evidence of crimes - all a Dem hoax".

How do you possibly have 1,000 trafficked pedophilia victims, and no chargeable crimes?

This wasn't a single case of familial pedophilic incest. It was a worldwide pedophile trafficking ring, flying children in from North America, Eastern Europe, and Russia! Yet, there's no evidence of crimes? 1,000 victims?
 
Luce said:
Yes. Normal people would report pedophiles.

We hear that line from statutory rapists all the time.

"I had no idea she was 12!"

Doesn't cut it.
Click to expand...

Given your life's experience, is it even possible to have 1,000 victims - and "no evidence supporting criminal charges"?

1,000 children, trafficked from at least 3 continents (that I'm aware). But, it doesn't warrant charges?
 
Emlee said:
Why and where indeed..

Click to expand...


I think it's coming to be seen we'll likely never know the truth.

Trump was at his besty's mansion often during the heyday of Epstein's abuse with the youngest ones, before he was publicly outed as a pedo. Trump's name should be all over those files from that era. If & when he releases them, I suspect we will hardly see a mention.
 
Last edited:
Chomsky said:
I think it's coming to be seen we'll likely never know the truth.

Trump was at his besty's mansion often during the heyday of Epstein's abuse with the youngest ones, before he was publicly outed as a pedo. Trump's name should be all over those files from that era. If & when he releases them, I suspect we will hardly see a mention.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately I believe you're correct. The president obviously does not want them released for obvious reasons and the AG in complic.
 
armycowboy said:
Unfortunately I believe you're correct. The president obviously does not want them released for obvious reasons and the AG in complic.
Click to expand...

I don't know what to say?

As hideous as these crimes are, Trump's protecting those in the files is crime enough for me.
 
Trump is not implicated in any crime.

No, in the Epstein files is this:

GwmzGEkWsAAD1j1
 
Oswald was Innocent said:
No they're not. Here's an update!


Benny Johnson
@bennyjohnson




🚨
BREAKING: Sen. Mullin is heading to the Senate floor with a bombshell resolution demanding every Epstein file be unsealed NOW. It calls on all courts to release everything, including grand jury material, with redactions only to protect victims.

If Democrats block this, it makes one thing clear: this was never about justice, it was always about politics.



Last edited12:33 PM · Jul 24, 2025


Click to expand...

Dems did indeed block it.
 
Chomsky said:
I'm not sure what you're getting at here? In going after me, for Biden?

The subject is Trump, and his protecting his pedo buddy's associates - including himself.
Click to expand...
But why have you and the rest of the Dems worked so hard to try to turn the conversation to only Trump supposedly protecting his "pedo buddy's associates". Biden clearly did the exact same thing. You are so consumed with Trump hate - that you can't seem to see past it and have a reasonable or logical conversation. There is clearly a reason EVERYONE has chosen to keep that info quiet.
 
gbg3 said:
But why have you and the rest of the Dems worked so hard to try to turn the conversation to only Trump supposedly protecting his "pedo buddy's associates". Biden clearly did the exact same thing. You are so consumed with Trump hate - that you can't seem to see past it and have a reasonable or logical conversation. There is clearly a reason EVERYONE has chosen to keep that info quiet.
Click to expand...
Why do you refuse to admit it was Trump , his loyalists and his base that was demanding the release of the file and have now changed their mind?
 
Luce said:
There's a simple way to deal with this.

Look at the files NOW, and arrest anyone who's culpable, regardless of who they are.

Or is prosecuting pedophiles bad when it's politically inconvenient?
Click to expand...
How do you determine culpability? Because they went to the island?
And if they did and enjoyed the company of a female, then how do you determine the age of any of the girls there at the time? How do you find out which male had anything to do with any female on the island?

You're so hungry for your pound of political flesh, especially if Trump was somehow involved, you don't know how it can be determined if some guy was with an underage girl or not?
How many years ago was that? Where are the pictures? Where are the birth certificates of those girls to determine what age they were when they were there?
Or do those messy facts mean anything if you're ready to paint anyone who went there with the same ugly brush?
 
Luce said:
Yes. Normal people would report pedophiles.

We hear that line from statutory rapists all the time.

"I had no idea she was 12!"

Doesn't cut it.
Click to expand...
Who would be determining the age of any female there?
You think there may be a record and photograph of every female who checked in on the island?
 
Callen said:
Seems it was the other way around ...very confusing what is actually going on
www.kosu.org

Oklahoma Sen. Mullin blocks Epstein file release from DOJ, proposes limited court document unsealing

Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., blocked a resolution that would require the Department of Justice to release all documents related to deceased, convicted child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein on Thursday.
www.kosu.org www.kosu.org
Click to expand...
This nation is a joke. It's hard to believe we're at a point where conspiracy nutters are driving this and both political parties are playing hot potato with voting on release of information. Good lord, this is hot garbage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom