• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files

Greenbeard

Greenbeard

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
26,214
Reaction score
33,865
Location
Cambridge, MA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Well, duh, the guy doesn't have much of a poker face and has been telegraphing this for weeks through his flailing.

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files
When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a “truckload” of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump’s name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

In May, Bondi and her deputy informed the president at a meeting in the White House that his name was in the Epstein files, the officials said. Many other high-profile figures were also named, Trump was told. Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing.
Click to expand...
In a statement to the Journal on Friday, Bondi and the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, said nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution. “As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings,” they said.
Click to expand...

Anyway, hoax, no files, Obama, etc.
 
"Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing."

End of story. End of thread.
 
Roadvirus said:
So why is Trump so defensive about releasing Epstein-related stuff?
Click to expand...
I don't see him as "defensive". I see him as dismissing something that is irrelevant.
 
Mycroft said:
I don't see him as "defensive". I see him as dismissing something that is irrelevant.
Click to expand...

If it is all irrelevant, then he should have nothing to worry about.
And if he has nothing to worry about, he should have no problem releasing them.

Yet, he has a problem with releasing them to the point where he goes on SM & rants that it is a hoax created by Obama or Biden or Lizard people or whatever.
 
mike2810 said:
Not so fast.
Do you know the content of those records do not show any wrongdoing?
Click to expand...
If there was something there, it would have been used long ago by the Democrats.
 
Roadvirus said:
If it is all irrelevant, then he should have nothing to worry about.
And if he has nothing to worry about, he should have no problem releasing them.

Yet, he has a problem with releasing them to the point where he goes on SM & rants that it is a hoax created by Obama or Biden or Lizard people or whatever.
Click to expand...
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.

You know, spin, speculation, innuendo, lies...the usual Trump hating nonsense.

There's no reason to feed the Trump hating beast.
 
Mycroft said:
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.
Click to expand...
Then it sounds like this is a great opportunity for Trump to clear his name by releasing the unredacted documents!
 
Mycroft said:
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.

You know, spin, speculation, innuendo, lies...the usual Trump hating nonsense.

There's no reason to feed the Trump hating beast.
Click to expand...

My statement still stands: if it's not a problem, he shouldn't have a problem with releasing them.
 
Mycroft said:
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.
Click to expand...

Indeed, it's like the old saying goes: "Better to remain obstructive and be thought a pedoconservative than to release the files and remove all doubt."
 
Gatsby said:
Then it sounds like this is a great opportunity for Trump to clear his name by releasing the unredacted documents!
Click to expand...

What ever documents that are NOT part of the GF preceding's have been released.

Where do think CNN got this story from.

Screenshot 2025-07-22 205535.webp
 
Greenbeard said:
Indeed, it's like the old saying goes: "Better to remain obstructive and be thought a pedoconservative than to release the files and remove all doubt."
Click to expand...
It's nothing like that. I've already explained it.
 
Roadvirus said:
If it is all irrelevant, then he should have nothing to worry about.
And if he has nothing to worry about, he should have no problem releasing them.

Yet, he has a problem with releasing them to the point where he goes on SM & rants that it is a hoax created by Obama or Biden or Lizard people or whatever.
Click to expand...

And is now bringing up Hillary's emails, again, and Obama & Biden & the Russian 'hoax'. Trying as hard as they can to distract from this.
 
Mycroft said:
"Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing."

End of story. End of thread.
Click to expand...


Certainly not, why being in a room with Epstein with a teen girl being raped is not a sign of wrong doing.

Why next it will be the girl asked for it right,
 
Mycroft said:
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.

You know, spin, speculation, innuendo, lies...the usual Trump hating nonsense.

There's no reason to feed the Trump hating beast.
Click to expand...
Perhaps trump had a gay/bro love with Clinton?
 
Demon said:
I see him as dismissing something that is incriminating.
Click to expand...
What makes you think there's anything incriminating?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom