• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

just a bunch of people having fun, watching cars burn

You have not presented facts, but ridiculous spin. The comparison is apt in terms of the response, which you've done nothing to address and instead spin on your thumb with an absurd summary of J6 and the president's role and this event.
Its no spin...its fact. Trump offered the National Guard to the rat retards you vote for...they declined it. The J6 protesters entered the building at 2. The National Guard actually arrived on scene at 5:20. The last protesters peacefully walked out of the building around 6pm. The building was declared safe at 8. Congress back in session by 9.

You made a really really really stupid comment. I'd like to say I expected better of you...but we have to be honest here...right?
 
Mostly peaceful protest.
 
Clown. Most of the media wait for dog whistles from liberals. In this case the mayor and the governor. But the LAPD police chief says they are "overwhelmed". Too many people having fun I guess.

 
This is about as peaceful as J6.
 
But the LAPD police chief says they are "overwhelmed".


Too much time spent shooting reporters with rubber bullets and attempting to get their horses to trample lone protestors that are already lying on the ground, while surrounded by mounted and dismounted officers, I guess.






 
Also this:






There's a reason that effective and reasonable Presidents coordinate federal help with state and local government personnel.

:rolleyes:
 
New gaslighting phrase of the day... PEACEFUL.



The hypocrisy knows no end among the left. Citizen journalism shows what the propaganda press will not.
 
Its no spin...its fact. Trump offered the National Guard to the rat retards you vote for...they declined it. The J6 protesters entered the building at 2. The National Guard actually arrived on scene at 5:20. The last protesters peacefully walked out of the building around 6pm. The building was declared safe at 8. Congress back in session by 9.
I certainly hope you're not referring to that since debunked nonsense of Trump having requested 20k NG troops.

You made a really really really stupid comment. I'd like to say I expected better of you...but we have to be honest here...right?
I mean, I can understand why you'd think it's stupid, but since your entire premise is laughably, I guess you end up with the load of tosh you served up. I'd like to say I expected better of you, but I didn't because of your predictability.
 
I certainly hope you're not referring to that since debunked nonsense of Trump having requested 20k NG troops.


I mean, I can understand why you'd think it's stupid, but since your entire premise is laughably, I guess you end up with the load of tosh you served up. I'd like to say I expected better of you, but I didn't because of your predictability.
There's nothing debunked. Trump offered. The rat retards you vote for turned them down. National Guard troops showed up at 5:20. The whole thing ended with people walking away by 6. Building proclaimed secure by 8. Congress back in session by 9.

You made a really really really stupid comment and lack the ability to just admit it.

Speaks volumes...but its all been said before.
 
These videos are edited. In the first one, this guy was setting a fire barrier to stop or burn police horses. The australian reporter was standing between the police and the people they were firing at because she's dumb.







Too much time spent shooting reporters with rubber bullets and attempting to get their horses to trample lone protestors that are already lying on the ground, while surrounded by mounted and dismounted officers, I guess.






 
Also this:






There's a reason that effective and reasonable Presidents coordinate federal help with state and local government personnel.

:rolleyes:

:ROFLMAO:

Ive been on organized deployments where we slept on pallets and toolboxes. You think thats traumatic?
 
There's nothing debunked. Trump offered. The rat retards you vote for turned them down. National Guard troops showed up at 5:20. The whole thing ended with people walking away by 6. Building proclaimed secure by 8. Congress back in session by 9.
So odd then that he just turned them down without a fight and yet this go around he had no problem deploying them despite Newsom saying he didn't need them. Why the difference?

You made a really really really stupid comment and lack the ability to just admit it.
That's your opinion, and based on your rationale, the stupidity isn't with my comment, but feel free to continue repeating yourself.

Speaks volumes...but its all been said before.
🤭

Since you've added nothing to make your point, feel free to harp on the same issue to your hearts content. It doesn't make it any less daft, but maybe it works differently for you.
 
In the first one, this guy was setting a fire barrier to stop or burn police horses. The australian reporter was standing between the police and the people they were firing at because she's dumb.

The guy lighting a fire (allegedly) changes nothing about the video. He was already down on the ground - surrounded by multiple mounted police, and even more dismounted police - and was just lying there while they tried to get their horses to trample him.

If that cop's aim is that bad - he has no business holding that position during crowd control. Who was he meaning to shoot at, and what were they doing?
 

"It could turn very volatile if you move law enforcement in there in the wrong way and turn what is just a bunch of people having fun, watching cars burn, into a massive confrontation and altercation between officers and demonstrators."​

This is why I...and a lot of other people...don't watch main stream media.


They show you that, but not this.

 
So odd then that he just turned them down without a fight and yet this go around he had no problem deploying them despite Newsom saying he didn't need them. Why the difference?


That's your opinion, and based on your rationale, the stupidity isn't with my comment, but feel free to continue repeating yourself.


🤭

Since you've added nothing to make your point, feel free to harp on the same issue to your hearts content. It doesn't make it any less daft, but maybe it works differently for you.
He offered them in advance. There was no 'fight'...he offered...your rat retards declined.

Your arguments just keep getting dumber while you keep digging deeper.
 

"It could turn very volatile if you move law enforcement in there in the wrong way and turn what is just a bunch of people having fun, watching cars burn, into a massive confrontation and altercation between officers and demonstrators."​

This is why I...and a lot of other people...don't watch main stream media.

It's absolutely propaganda.
 
:ROFLMAO:

Ive been on organized deployments where we slept on pallets and toolboxes. You think thats traumatic?

So have I.

No, I made no claim about it being "traumatic". You think it's good planning?
 
He offered them in advance. There was no 'fight'...he offered...your rat retards declined.
Yes, and no one is debating that but what he didn't do is override the declined offer the way he did this go around. You seem to keep dodging that point.

Your arguments just keep getting dumber while you keep digging deeper.
Dumb to you, and we know why.
 
So have I.

No, I made no claim about it being "traumatic". You think it's good planning?
I think its extremely normal for rapid deployment circumstances.
 
Yes, and no one is debating that but what he didn't do is override the declined offer the way he did this go around. You seem to keep dodging that point.


Dumb to you, and we know why.
Dood...seriously...why do you do this to yourself?

He cant usurp a mayors power when there was no crisis in effect. He offered the troops in the PLANNING stage...and the rat retards you support refused them.

This just keeps getting worse.

so I'ma do you a favor...................probably way too long a time in coming........

into the box.
 
Nobody cares. That's his newsworthy as a boy scout meeting.

Indeed. The right-wing needs to make it about isolated acts of violence to get support for turning the military on civilians.
 
Back
Top Bottom