- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 33,522
- Reaction score
- 10,826
- Location
- Between Athens and Jerusalem
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
There is sufficient evidence to appoint a special prosecutor...there does not have to be proof, but a body of evidence of high crimes or misdemeanors....in this case Lois Lewrner has made statements to the committe *under oath*, statements which have since been contradicted by a series of witnesses, those she had attempted to blame.
that is clear indication of an attempt to deceive and obstruct justice. Her continuing refusal to hide behind the fifth amendment when she has surrendered that right with an opening statement is yet another indication of moral collapse within the system....the executive itself is indicated in wrong doing.
What's the point?
What's the point?
There won't be an appointment of a special prosecutor unless there is evidence against someone in the inner circle.Absolutely. Now the question is why there hasn't been one appointed. Maybe the dont want to distract from Benghazi. Maybe they want to wait until after the election when the atmosphere is more amendable . Who knows.
I know you don't believe this, but neither the President nor the Democrats have anything to worry about. Despite what Ms. Mitchell says this is a phony scandal. I would hope at some point they give Lois Lerner immunity from prosecution, so she can testify.I think the dems are going to be forced to see just that.
I'm not spinning, that USA article speaks the truth.who says very clearly that she talked to people in Cincinnati.....snip~
That's the Point PB.....and now that all the material is in here those on the Right can bring it up anytime you keep coming with the spin. :spin:
Absolutely. Now the question is why there hasn't been one appointed. Maybe the dont want to distract from Benghazi. Maybe they want to wait until after the election when the atmosphere is more amendable . Who knows.
Absolutely. Now the question is why there hasn't been one appointed. Maybe the dont want to distract from Benghazi. Maybe they want to wait until after the election when the atmosphere is more amendable . Who knows.
I think they're afraid of uncovering evidence that overwhelmingly supports impeachment and nobody wants to be the guy that impeached the first, "black", president. Besides that, Nancy Pelosi would **** a snake to protect Obama, because the Libbos can't afford for the first black president to become the biggest failure in American history.
There won't be an appointment of a special prosecutor unless there is evidence against someone in the inner circle.
I know you don't believe this, but neither the President nor the Democrats have anything to worry about. Despite what Ms. Mitchell says this is a phony scandal. I would hope at some point they give Lois Lerner immunity from prosecution, so she can testify.
I think they're afraid of uncovering evidence that overwhelmingly supports impeachment and nobody wants to be the guy that impeached the first, "black", president. Besides that, Nancy Pelosi would **** a snake to protect Obama, because the Libbos can't afford for the first black president to become the biggest failure in American history.
I'm not spinning, that USA article speaks the truth.
Yeah, Libby fell on his sword for him, that's loyalty.
Read the following news article from USA Today and give me your opinion.
Transcripts show IRS agents in Cincinnati -- not Washington -- flagged Tea Party cases
VA Scandal You bet, but it's been that way for a long time.
Keep being you Pete. Ripley's will make space for you at some point.
Keep being you Pete. Ripley's will make space for you at some point.
Okay ... I read it ... it's very damning for Obama's IRS.
I'm surprised you posted it.
In his closing arguments in the Libby case, Fitzgerald famously declared: “There is a cloud over what the vice president did that week. … That cloud remains because the defendant has obstructed justice and lied about what happened.”Patrick Fitzgerald's Legacy: Letting Rove And Cheney Go
President Barack Obama said Wednesday that he was "angry" at IRS officials who inappropriately targeted conservative groups for scrutiny, announcing that his administration had sought and accepted Steven Miller's resignation as interim commissioner of the IRS.
Obama calls IRS flap 'inexcusable,' announces resignation of acting IRS chief - U.S. News
The testimony of the IRS employees in Cincinnati shown in the article exonerates President Obama. Here it is, you might try reading it.Faux fall guys and fake outrage.
The testimony of the IRS employees in Cincinnati shown in the article exonerates President Obama. Here it is, you might try reading it.
Transcripts show IRS agents in Cincinnati -- not Washington -- flagged Tea Party cases
Faux fall guys and fake outrage.
Oh yeah ... Obama was fit to be tied that such a thing could have been happening right through his election year.President Barack Obama said Wednesday that he was "angry" at IRS officials who inappropriately targeted conservative groups for scrutiny, announcing that his administration had sought and accepted Steven Miller's resignation as interim commissioner of the IRS.
Obama calls IRS flap 'inexcusable,' announces resignation of acting IRS chief - U.S. News
Yeah, it's a bitch when you have NOTHING to refute my claim. :lamo:lamoThe testimony of the IRS employees in Cincinnati shown in the article exonerates President Obama. Here it is, you might try reading it.
Transcripts show IRS agents in Cincinnati -- not Washington -- flagged Tea Party cases
Apparently President Obama felt he was incompetent and forced him to resign.Oh yeah ... Obama was fit to be tied that such a thing could have been happening right through his election year.
uh-huh.
But anyway ... if it was just in Cincy, and not a scandal, why'd the guy resign?
Yeah, it's a bitch when you have NOTHING to refute my claim. :lamo
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?