• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge who fined Trump $500 million gets the books thrown at him

----------

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2023
Messages
6,590
Reaction score
2,136
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Another win for the "convicted felon". President Trump just keeps winning and winning.

In New York, a court revealed that a leading citizen had cooked the books by inflating questionable figures without any support in reality. Moreover, his wild overvaluation was widely viewed as motivated by his self-aggrandizement. The final reported figures are so absurdly inflated that they were rejected in their entirety. In the end, he was off by over half a billion dollars.

That man is Judge Arthur Engoron.

After a New York appellate court unanimously threw out Engoron's absurd half-a-billion-dollar judgment and interest against President Donald Trump, the irony was crushing. It was Engoron who seemed, as he characterized Trump witnesses, as having "simply denied reality." It made his notorious reliance on an assessment of Mar-a-Lago as worth between $18 million and $27.6 million seem like good accounting.

In the end, he could not get a single judge to preserve a single dollar of that fine.

For some of us who covered that trial, the most vivid image of Engoron came at the start. He indicated that he did not want cameras in the courtroom, but when the networks showed up, Engoron took off his glasses and seemed to pose for the cameras.

It was a "Sunset Boulevard" moment. We only need Gloria Swanson looking into the camera to speak to "those wonderful people out there in the dark!" and announcing "all right, [Ms. James], I'm ready for my close-up."

The close-up was not a good idea, and, on appeal, it was perfectly disastrous. The court found little legal or factual basis for his fine. The purported witnesses not only did not lose a dime, but they testified that they made money on the loans and wanted new loans with the Trump administration. That did not move Engoron. From the start, he was speaking to those "wonderful people out there."

click here to read

winninggggggggggggggggggggggggggCapture.GIF
 
Another win for the "convicted felon". President Trump just keeps winning and winning.

In New York, a court revealed that a leading citizen had cooked the books by inflating questionable figures without any support in reality. Moreover, his wild overvaluation was widely viewed as motivated by his self-aggrandizement. The final reported figures are so absurdly inflated that they were rejected in their entirety. In the end, he was off by over half a billion dollars.

That man is Judge Arthur Engoron.

After a New York appellate court unanimously threw out Engoron's absurd half-a-billion-dollar judgment and interest against President Donald Trump, the irony was crushing. It was Engoron who seemed, as he characterized Trump witnesses, as having "simply denied reality." It made his notorious reliance on an assessment of Mar-a-Lago as worth between $18 million and $27.6 million seem like good accounting.

In the end, he could not get a single judge to preserve a single dollar of that fine.

For some of us who covered that trial, the most vivid image of Engoron came at the start. He indicated that he did not want cameras in the courtroom, but when the networks showed up, Engoron took off his glasses and seemed to pose for the cameras.

It was a "Sunset Boulevard" moment. We only need Gloria Swanson looking into the camera to speak to "those wonderful people out there in the dark!" and announcing "all right, [Ms. James], I'm ready for my close-up."


The close-up was not a good idea, and, on appeal, it was perfectly disastrous. The court found little legal or factual basis for his fine. The purported witnesses not only did not lose a dime, but they testified that they made money on the loans and wanted new loans with the Trump administration. That did not move Engoron. From the start, he was speaking to those "wonderful people out there."

click here to read

View attachment 67585642
OFFS.
The court decided that the guilty finding was appropriate, just that the fine was too high.
Do you people have no filters? Do you really not know how you look? Or if you know, you don't care, just as long as the adoration rings out.
Honest to gawd, this post looks and sounds very North Korean.
 
President Trump still has to pay fines.

Period
End of story
 
OFFS.
The court decided that the guilty finding was appropriate, just that the fine was too high.
Do you people have no filters? Do you really not know how you look? Or if you know, you don't care, just as long as the adoration rings out.
Honest to gawd, this post looks and sounds very North Korean.
Which means Big Daddy wins yet again. Do Liberals know how they look right now? Gawd, Liberals are sounding just like communists.
 
Then why ask? There was no point in asking.

You seem to think Trump has somehow been validated. He hasn't. The sentence was problematic, not the fraud conviction.
 
Which means Big Daddy wins yet again. Do Liberals know how they look right now? Gawd, Liberals are sounding just like communists.
Wins what? A chance to appeal the conviction and be levied another, smaller penalty?
Do you prefer Big Daddy to Dear Leader? I can't keep up with the cultspeak. And communists, hell, you don't know what a liberal or a communist is. You just toss around words at random, these words for the right and those words for the left. You don't know what the simplest words mean.
 
You seem to think Trump has somehow been validated. He hasn't. The sentence was problematic, not the fraud conviction.
Winning is validation.

Liberals continue to whine. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Wins what? A chance to appeal the conviction and be levied another, smaller penalty?
Do you prefer Big Daddy to Dear Leader? I can't keep up with the cultspeak. And communists, hell, you don't know what a liberal or a communist is. You just toss around words at random, these words for the right and those words for the left. You don't know what the simplest words mean.
Someone seems upset.
 
OFFS.
The court decided that the guilty finding was appropriate, just that the fine was too high.
Do you people have no filters? Do you really not know how you look? Or if you know, you don't care, just as long as the adoration rings out.
Honest to gawd, this post looks and sounds very North Korean.
MAGAs are easily fooled.
 
Back
Top Bottom