The vast majority of sex, of both humans and even many other animals does not result in procreation. That is reality.
You mean an alternate reality in which non-procreation sex isn't practiced?
Natural sex acts are capable of resulting in procreation.
No I mean an alternate reality in which sodomy is natural.
Why is anybody obligated to perform sex acts that result in procreation?
And what are you basing what is "natural" on?
Natural sex acts are capable of resulting in procreation.
Because that's the nature of human sexuality.
Human nature.
Not for everyone, and for various reasons.
Philosophical argument. Subjective. Opinion.
The nature of natural sex acts is to be capable of resulting in conception. That ecocide circumstances of persons impede this does not change the nature of the act.
Duh. No. No.
You have nothing but opinion here. This is why you lose your arguments. You can't even recognize that the philosophical argument you are trying to present is subjective. It is nothing but your personal opinion.
As for the nature of sex, you failed. The fact that some people cannot procreate when having sex means that it absolutely does counter the notion that the natural end of sex is procreation.
This idiotic blather is just that, idiotic blather. Simply repeating "that's your opinion" doesn't change the nature of reality any more than sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "I can't here you" does.
No it doesn't mean that. For instance, the nature of legs is to walk. Some people legs are incapable of fulfilling this function. That doesn't change the nature of a leg.
This idiotic blather is just that, idiotic blather. Simply repeating "that's your opinion" doesn't change the nature of reality any more than sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "I can't here you" does.
No it doesn't mean that. For instance, the nature of legs is to walk. Some people legs are incapable of fulfilling this function. That doesn't change the nature of a leg.
Moderator's Warning: |
Notice the [W:287]. This is the second in-thread. Stick to the topic and which has nothing to do with religion. Take that to another thread or there is an E-ticket ride out of the thread and/or points. |
Because that's the nature of human sexuality.
Human nature.
This idiotic blather is just that, idiotic blather. Simply repeating "that's your opinion" doesn't change the nature of reality any more than sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "I can't here you" does.
No it doesn't mean that. For instance, the nature of legs is to walk. Some people legs are incapable of fulfilling this function. That doesn't change the nature of a leg.
Moderator's Warning: The topic has not been discussed for pages. The topic is: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]
Notice the [W:287]. This is the second in-thread. Stick to the topic and which has nothing to do with religion. Take that to another thread or there is an E-ticket ride out of the thread and/or points.
Well I'll be damned. Now I know what things like "[W:287]" mean in a thread title.
Seriously, thanks.
>>>>
A better example would be that the nature of legs is to walk, yet some people use them for dancing. Is dancing unnatural then? This is why you can't use naturalism as an argument: you'll always hit a giant brick wall with a sign that says "my opinion" on it it every time.
What essential difference is there between dancing and walking?
That depends entirely on the goal.
What?
What do you think the goals of dancing and walking are?
They can vary extremely.
I already explained it. If your claim is that sodomy laws make it illegal for homosexuals to "be themselves", then you are defining "themselves" by their sodomy. And the really strange thing is that this isn't strange. It's not strange because homosexuals do that to themselves. The only people in the world that I know of that define themselves primarily by their sexual behavior is the GLBT community. Your post merely reinforced that.
The vast majority of sex, of both humans and even many other animals does not result in procreation. That is reality.
What essential difference is there between dancing and walking?
What do you think the goals of dancing and walking are?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?