• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge rules that anti-woke is just racism

j brown's body

"A Soros-backed animal"
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
78,965
Reaction score
83,381
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
"Earlier this week, a federal judge in Boston explicitly called out the Trump administration for its “palpably clear” discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ+ Americans in a case involving canceled grants from the National Institutes of Health. ...In executive orders signed during his first weeks in office, he (Trump) targeted “Illegal DEI and DEIA policies,” claiming that they violate civil rights laws. He declared that “it is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female,” and branded “efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex” as discriminatory against women and girls

...Judge Young, who was appointed to the federal bench by Ronald Reagan in 1985, called the terminations “arbitrary and capricious.” But he went further than other judges in the many impoundment suits, calling the administration out for its flagrant animus against racial and sexual minorities. “I am hesitant to draw this conclusion — but I have an unflinching obligation to draw it — that this represents racial discrimination and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community,” he said, according to Politico. “That’s what this is. I would be blind not to call it out. My duty is to call it out.“

...DOJ lawyer Thomas Ports Jr. countered by echoing NIH’s boilerplate termination notices. “Research programs based on gender identity are often unscientific, have little identifiable return on investment and do nothing to enhance the health of many Americans. Many such studies ignore rather than seriously examine biological realities,” he said. ”It is an improvement to eliminate these.”

“Where’s the support for that?” Judge Young shot back. “I see no evidence of that.” ...Ports wasn’t even able to define “DEI” when pressed by the court. “You are bearing down on people of color because of their color,” the judge hammered on. “The Constitution will not permit that.”"

Link

Yup. And a Reagan appointed judge, no less.
 
Thank you, Judge Young!

We’ll see what the White House decides to do.

I’m not hopeful.
 
It’ll be a bump in the polls for Trump. This is what they wanted. They could care less if it’s getting called out for what it is. They’re proud of it. Heck that’s what they elected him for. He is just keeping campaign promises.
 
"Earlier this week, a federal judge in Boston explicitly called out the Trump administration for its “palpably clear” discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ+ Americans in a case involving canceled grants from the National Institutes of Health. ...In executive orders signed during his first weeks in office, he (Trump) targeted “Illegal DEI and DEIA policies,” claiming that they violate civil rights laws. He declared that “it is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female,” and branded “efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex” as discriminatory against women and girls

...Judge Young, who was appointed to the federal bench by Ronald Reagan in 1985, called the terminations “arbitrary and capricious.” But he went further than other judges in the many impoundment suits, calling the administration out for its flagrant animus against racial and sexual minorities. “I am hesitant to draw this conclusion — but I have an unflinching obligation to draw it — that this represents racial discrimination and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community,” he said, according to Politico. “That’s what this is. I would be blind not to call it out. My duty is to call it out.“

...DOJ lawyer Thomas Ports Jr. countered by echoing NIH’s boilerplate termination notices. “Research programs based on gender identity are often unscientific, have little identifiable return on investment and do nothing to enhance the health of many Americans. Many such studies ignore rather than seriously examine biological realities,” he said. ”It is an improvement to eliminate these.”


“Where’s the support for that?” Judge Young shot back. “I see no evidence of that.” ...Ports wasn’t even able to define “DEI” when pressed by the court. “You are bearing down on people of color because of their color,” the judge hammered on. “The Constitution will not permit that.”"

Link

Yup. And a Reagan appointed judge, no less.
Well said. And he is right. It had to be said.
 
"Earlier this week, a federal judge in Boston explicitly called out the Trump administration for its “palpably clear” discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ+ Americans in a case involving canceled grants from the National Institutes of Health. ...In executive orders signed during his first weeks in office, he (Trump) targeted “Illegal DEI and DEIA policies,” claiming that they violate civil rights laws. He declared that “it is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female,” and branded “efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex” as discriminatory against women and girls

...Judge Young, who was appointed to the federal bench by Ronald Reagan in 1985, called the terminations “arbitrary and capricious.” But he went further than other judges in the many impoundment suits, calling the administration out for its flagrant animus against racial and sexual minorities. “I am hesitant to draw this conclusion — but I have an unflinching obligation to draw it — that this represents racial discrimination and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community,” he said, according to Politico. “That’s what this is. I would be blind not to call it out. My duty is to call it out.“

...DOJ lawyer Thomas Ports Jr. countered by echoing NIH’s boilerplate termination notices. “Research programs based on gender identity are often unscientific, have little identifiable return on investment and do nothing to enhance the health of many Americans. Many such studies ignore rather than seriously examine biological realities,” he said. ”It is an improvement to eliminate these.”


“Where’s the support for that?” Judge Young shot back. “I see no evidence of that.” ...Ports wasn’t even able to define “DEI” when pressed by the court. “You are bearing down on people of color because of their color,” the judge hammered on. “The Constitution will not permit that.”"

Link

Yup. And a Reagan appointed judge, no less.


Why, in America do they talk about "sex" in these cases when the issue is "gender"?
 
Why, in America do they talk about "sex" in these cases when the issue is "gender"?

I believe Trump was talking about biological characteristics, which fall under sex.
 
"Earlier this week, a federal judge in Boston explicitly called out the Trump administration for its “palpably clear” discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ+ Americans in a case involving canceled grants from the National Institutes of Health. ...In executive orders signed during his first weeks in office, he (Trump) targeted “Illegal DEI and DEIA policies,” claiming that they violate civil rights laws. He declared that “it is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female,” and branded “efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex” as discriminatory against women and girls

...Judge Young, who was appointed to the federal bench by Ronald Reagan in 1985, called the terminations “arbitrary and capricious.” But he went further than other judges in the many impoundment suits, calling the administration out for its flagrant animus against racial and sexual minorities. “I am hesitant to draw this conclusion — but I have an unflinching obligation to draw it — that this represents racial discrimination and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community,” he said, according to Politico. “That’s what this is. I would be blind not to call it out. My duty is to call it out.“

...DOJ lawyer Thomas Ports Jr. countered by echoing NIH’s boilerplate termination notices. “Research programs based on gender identity are often unscientific, have little identifiable return on investment and do nothing to enhance the health of many Americans. Many such studies ignore rather than seriously examine biological realities,” he said. ”It is an improvement to eliminate these.”


“Where’s the support for that?” Judge Young shot back. “I see no evidence of that.” ...Ports wasn’t even able to define “DEI” when pressed by the court. “You are bearing down on people of color because of their color,” the judge hammered on. “The Constitution will not permit that.”"

Link

Yup. And a Reagan appointed judge, no less.
Maybe the judge should study science, in particular biology.
 
Maybe the judge should study science, in particular biology.

.Judge Young, who was appointed to the federal bench by Ronald Reagan in 1985, called the terminations “arbitrary and capricious.” But he went further than other judges in the many impoundment suits, calling the administration out for its flagrant animus against racial and sexual minorities. “I am hesitant to draw this conclusion — but I have an unflinching obligation to draw it — that this represents racial discrimination and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community,” he said

Is Reagan's political party saying the Gipper made a mistake in appointing this judge to the bench?
 
Why, in America do they talk about "sex" in these cases when the issue is "gender"?
Because they are and have always meant the same thing. Male = man. Female = woman.
 
Back
Top Bottom