I did a republic for government is the people and what the people vote for Donald Trump because they want him to remove illegal aliens that commit criminal Acts a judge saying no you can't be Commander in Chief over the national guard is rebelling.Black’s Law is a much better reference for legal definitions.
Rebellion
Definition and Citations:
“Deliberate, organized resistance, by force and arms, to the laws or operations of the government …”
REBELLION Definition & Meaning - Black's Law Dictionary
Find the legal definition of REBELLION from Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition. Deliberate, organized resistance, by force and arms, to the laws or operations of the government, committed by a subject See Hubbard v. Harnden Exp. Co.,...thelawdictionary.org
Then there’s federal law, which should be familiar to all that witnessed the historic attack on Congress by deranged, violent Traitor Trump cultists.
§2383. Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
IF January 6th, 2021 wasn’t a “rebellion”, no way the protests in CA are.
Horse shit.
More idiotic horse shit!
Even more horse shit!
Judge Breyer’s order was not overturned.
The Traitor Trump administration was granted an “administrative stay”.
Newsom is desperate to maintain his leadership of the opposition against Trump. He is actively campaigning to stay in the news so he can launch his presidential campaign next year.“In an order following an afternoon hearing, Breyer concluded that "Defendants are temporarily ENJOINED from deploying members of the California National Guard in Los Angeles. Defendants are DIRECTED to return control of the California National Guard to Governor Newsom."
In the case, Trump is the defendant and Newsom is the plaintiff.”
“Newsom wrote on X on Thursday:"BREAKING: The court just confirmed what we all know — the military belongs on the battlefield, not on our city streets. This win is not just for California, but the nation. It's a check on a man whose authoritarian tendencies are increasing by the day. End the illegal militarization of Los Angeles now, @realDonaldTrump. History is watching."
"The National Guard is a state-based military force"They don't seem to understand that the national guard is national in the answer to the Commander in Chief for those courts seeking deploy it that's his job.
If Governor dick cheese I had not been fingering his starfish while la descended into chaos he would be humiliated by his lack of action."The National Guard is a state-based military force"
Like seditious piece of shit governor in seditious piece of shit mayor letting terrorists destroy the city.The president is only allowed to deploy the guard in certain, very limited, curcumstances.
World Governor horseshit for brains didn't do thatGenerally speaking it is the gonernors job,
And in the case of an incompetent corrupt piece of shit worthless scumbag governor saying "**** you L A I hope you all burned to death" the president needs to act.not the presidents, to deploy the guard.
Wow. Childish name calling and no evidence to back up your point.Governor dick cheese I
seditious piece of shit governor in seditious piece of shit mayor
World Governor horseshit for brains
incompetent corrupt piece of shit worthless scumbag governor
governor's scumbag
The evidence is Trump took over the national guardWow. Childish name calling and no evidence to back up your point.
I only match what I'm dealing with.If you think you can have an adult conversation someday get back to me.
That doesnt make it legal.The evidence is Trump took over the national guard
I only match what I'm dealing with.
We'll see what the court says.That doesnt make it legal.
The District court judge granted the plaintiffs request to second guess the President’s decision to deploy the National Guard in the face of uncontrolled anarchy. The judge claimed there was no evidence to support the President’s decision despite the violence, looting, and organized illegal actions.
The law gives the President the authority to issue a finding of rebellion as just cause for deploying the National Guard. You don't understand that, do you? The judge decided to ignore the mountain of evidence supporting the President’s legal finding in favor of parroting the Democrats "mostly peaceful" propaganda.
Let's observe that your analogy is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand.
Indeed, the referee/umpire/legal expert isn't empowered to insert his or her personal opinion of the Bad Orange Man as a substitute for the law.
Wildly irrelevant. A violation of discovery rules has nothing to do with a District court judge second guessing a Presidential declaration.
The case was brought out of purely political ambition on the part of Gavin Newsome.
Except that is not what happened here. There was no lofty legal analysis involved. The judge ignored the evidence to side with the Orange Man Bad lynch mob.
Seems pretty clear cut. Even a friendly SCOTUS bench or "originalists" would find it hard to rule against the chapter an verse of the Constitution. At best, Convicted Felon Trump can count on Alito and Thomas. If not? Probably a unanimous decision against him, which they've done recently already on another issue.
The 9th court of appeals, one of the most reliably far Left in the country, quickly stayed the judge's ridiculous denial of reality. But restoring order played no part filing the lawsuit. It's all about abusing the court system for political power.There is no evidence of "uncontrolled anarchy"
But there must be evidence of "rebellion"
The president cant just make shit up as an excuse to deploy the guard.
In this case there is no evodence of rebellion.
No the judge found there is no ebodence to support the presidents position.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?