• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Engoran's Wife Post Anti-Trump Post on X

Yup, they were armed. Thanks for admitting that.

Pretty sure you wouldn't want to be beaten with a pole or sprayed with mace. But whatever.

Lol, flagpoles and bear spray made out to be the worst attack on our democracy since the days of the Civil War, lol.....Conspiracy Theory on steroids, lol. You bought into the bs narrative, admit it.
 
Lol, flagpoles and bear spray made out to be the worst attack on our democracy since the days of the Civil War, lol.....Conspiracy Theory on steroids, lol. You bought into the bs narrative, admit it.
You are an anti American. Your opinion on the matter is acknowledged and thrown in the Trumper trash bin where it belongs.
 
Lol, flagpoles and bear spray made out to be the worst attack on our democracy since the days of the Civil War, lol.....Conspiracy Theory on steroids, lol. You bought into the bs narrative, admit it.

So you'd have no problem with a mob with the same equipment turning up a few days after a new Trump presidency and storming the capital?
It's all just a fun day out.
 
How would you like to be beaten with a flagpole and then sprayed with bear spray?

I'm assuming you'd just shrug it off being the macho man you are.

I don't think flagpoles and bear spray equal being shot by real guns or exploding flash grenades or being beaten to death even after unconscious. The point is, clearly NOT an armed insurrection. Nobody, who is going to actually commit an armed insurrection is going to have flagpoles and bear spray....your narrative is total BS.
 
non-sequitor

I do not.webp


A non sequitur is a fallacy in which a conclusion does not follow logically from what preceded it. Also known as irrelevant reason and fallacy of the consequent.

The similarities of the two "Spouse of Judge" cases are pretty evident.

You could try "False Equivalency" (The fallacy, or false analogy, is an argument based on misleading, superficial, or implausible comparisons. It is also known as a faulty analogy, weak analogy, wrongful comparison, metaphor as argument, and analogical fallacy. The term comes from the Latin word fallacia, meaning "deception, deceit, trick, or artifice) although it really isn't that.

I think the term you are looking for is "deflection".

Source
 
I don't think flagpoles and bear spray equal being shot by real guns or exploding flash grenades or being beaten to death even after unconscious. The point is, clearly NOT an armed insurrection. Nobody, who is going to actually commit an armed insurrection is going to have flagpoles and bear spray....your narrative is total BS.

Tell that to the officers in the building at the time.
 
I don't think flagpoles and bear spray equal being shot by real guns or exploding flash grenades or being beaten to death even after unconscious. The point is, clearly NOT an armed insurrection. Nobody, who is going to actually commit an armed insurrection is going to have flagpoles and bear spray....your narrative is total BS.
Yet if it was the other way around, Trumper trash would be crying like little bitches.
 
Seems the judges wife has claimed she is not posting on twitter.
""I do not have a Twitter account. This is not me. I have not posted any anti Trump messages," "
Newsweek was unable to verify who the alleged account really belongs to.


Till it is proven the wife did post on twitter and posted the negative Trump posts, imo, it is trump followers trying to discredit the judge.
 
Lol, flagpoles and bear spray made out to be the worst attack on our democracy since the days of the Civil War, lol.....Conspiracy Theory on steroids, lol. You bought into the bs narrative, admit it.
Idiots engaging in an attempted overthrow are still idiots. They were just the distraction though, throwing their lives away over a New Yorker who is embarrassed by them but uses them anyway.

Of course the real overthrow attempt was with the fake electors and the false allegations of voting issues.
 
View attachment 67477251


A non sequitur is a fallacy in which a conclusion does not follow logically from what preceded it. Also known as irrelevant reason and fallacy of the consequent.

The similarities of the two "Spouse of Judge" cases are pretty evident.

You could try "False Equivalency" (The fallacy, or false analogy, is an argument based on misleading, superficial, or implausible comparisons. It is also known as a faulty analogy, weak analogy, wrongful comparison, metaphor as argument, and analogical fallacy. The term comes from the Latin word fallacia, meaning "deception, deceit, trick, or artifice) although it really isn't that.

I think the term you are looking for is "deflection".

Source
No. It’s not deflection. Your example could draw similarities to anyone with a pulse. They have that in common right?

There is no comparison worthy of debate.
 
Lol, flagpoles and bear spray made out to be the worst attack on our democracy since the days of the Civil War, lol.....Conspiracy Theory on steroids, lol. You bought into the bs narrative, admit it.
An armed, violent group attacked congress in an act of sedition. None of your deflection takes away the reality.
 
....or they are guilty and know the prosecution has the evidence. It's 3 LAWYERS who pled guilty. Two pled to felonies and very well may lose their license to practice law. Lawyers are not Joe Blow off the street scared of courts! They knew what they did was illegal and they pled out to save a mandatory prison sentence. I'm going to go out on a limb and say you haven't even read the evidence in the indictments. If you had you would know Trump is not facing any charges related to the riots.

Possibly, yet so is my take. Time will tell. For now, the suppression of voting and interfering in elections is working once again for the democrats....congratulations.
 
No. It’s not deflection. Your example could draw similarities to anyone with a pulse. They have that in common right?

There is no comparison worthy of debate.
...and they would all be deflection from the OP.

Again, as point out in post #174,
your OP and the rebuttal of Thomas and Ginni share the theme of a judges wife having influence upon their spouse in the performance of their duties.

There is a sequential logic to that.
 
Lol, flagpoles and bear spray made out to be the worst attack on our democracy since the days of the Civil War, lol.....Conspiracy Theory on steroids, lol. You bought into the bs narrative, admit it.
The riot itself was not the threat to democracy. Generally just a bunch of useful idiots rioting and acting like thugs. Some were intent in something much more sinister but most were just easily manipulated idiots.
 
I don't think flagpoles and bear spray equal being shot by real guns or exploding flash grenades or being beaten to death even after unconscious. The point is, clearly NOT an armed insurrection. Nobody, who is going to actually commit an armed insurrection is going to have flagpoles and bear spray....your narrative is total BS.
Quite a few of the convicted and what they were convicted of disagree with you.
Lonnie Coffman
Mark Mazza
Enrique Tarrio
Harlen Boen
Thomas Gronek
Leslie Grimes
Chris Alberts
Grant Moore
Julian Snell
Timothy Wolfe
Cleveland Meredith Jr
Samuel Fisher
Mark Ibrahim
All were armed with firearms at the Capitol, The FBI is still actively searching for others who were likely armed.
The FBI is still looking for the individual that placed pipe bombs outside the DNC near the Capitol.
You can paint it as a friendly kegger all you want but the fact remains that It was an unsuccessful insurrection attempt
 
I just got on and haven't read the thread, but I'm sure someone has by now mentioned that what this judge's wife does is just as removed from his judgements as Ginny (sp) Thomas or any millionaires are from the judgements of Clarence Thomas.

And now I'm off for a walk and the store...
 
I just got on and haven't read the thread, but I'm sure someone has by now mentioned that what this judge's wife does is just as removed from his judgements as Ginny (sp) Thomas or any millionaires are from the judgements of Clarence Thomas.

And now I'm off for a walk and the store...
That’s a bingo.
 
Possibly, yet so is my take. Time will tell. For now, the suppression of voting and interfering in elections is working once again for the democrats....congratulations.

I know the "interference" is Trump being charged for the crimes he committed.
but
What is the mechanism of the voter suppression you are imagining here?
 
I just got on and haven't read the thread, but I'm sure someone has by now mentioned that what this judge's wife does is just as removed from his judgements as Ginny (sp) Thomas or any millionaires are from the judgements of Clarence Thomas.

And now I'm off for a walk and the store...
Oddly the host of this topic feels that pointing out the similarities you mention are "Non Sequiturs" arguments. You, I and a few others have posted opinions contrary to this. So many have posted to this point that he now just posts the reply number (#5) where he first makes this claim. His further arguments (#212) just dig the hole deeper when he becomes confused on what a deflection (or perhaps false equivalency) argument is.
 
Between the juries who have already convicted trump, and the grand jurors who voted to indict him, there are at over 200 American citizens that thought there was enough evidence to indict / convict him. Were they all anti American, trump hating commies?

Don't know their political affiliation. So, because 200 citizens might think he's guilty....that makes him guilty?? What, divide 200 by 12 and you get 16.6 juries in your mind....is that how you see this?
 
You are an anti American. Your opinion on the matter is acknowledged and thrown in the Trumper trash bin where it belongs.

Your opinion is wholly propagandized...and worth a big pile of 💩
 
So you'd have no problem with a mob with the same equipment turning up a few days after a new Trump presidency and storming the capital?
It's all just a fun day out.

??? Lol, wtf are you talking about? The left has already showed up at the White House wanting to kill the President in 2020....they injured many secret service agents and police.
 
Back
Top Bottom