• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Engoran's Wife Post Anti-Trump Post on X

When Trump is constantly posting baseless attacks on her husband, It wouldn't be a surprise, nor unusual for the wife to take umbrage and say what she thinks about the immoral criminal abusing her husband as part of his political campaign. Not wise, but hardly anything that a million other wives wouldn't do in similar circumstances, and meaningless in the process of the courts duties.
 
ASHES said:
10/10 deflection from your post that wasn't sarcasm. Mocking sure. Sardonic maybe. But not sarcastic.
Click to expand...

If those posts were from the judges wife, they are not in defense of her husband as vitriol as they are, but one of political hatred and malice. Of course she is denying the posts, but time will tell.

The judge needs to sit this one out, as there has been far too much bias, all the way around this comedy.
 
redbeer said:
If those posts were from the judges wife, they are not in defense of her husband as vitriol as they are, but one of political hatred and malice. Of course she is denying the posts, but time will tell.
Click to expand...
Who cares? If it is her, she's allowed to speak her mind.
redbeer said:
The judge needs to sit this one out, as there has been far too much bias, all the way around this comedy.
Click to expand...
Saying it a thousand times doesn't make it true.
 
Jredbaron96 said:
^this is the perfect demonstration of the inanity of your argument.
Click to expand...
Your expectations are narrow in scope. If not so, I would be more inclined to take them under advisement.
 
VySky said:
Your expectations are narrow in scope. If not so, I would be more inclined to take them under advisement.
Click to expand...

Providing justification for an assertion of fact is such a basic component of a debate that I would assume it to be well understood, but your seeming ignorance of that fact explains much.
 
redbeer said:
If those posts were from the judges wife, they are not in defense of her husband as vitriol as they are, but one of political hatred and malice. Of course she is denying the posts, but time will tell.

The judge needs to sit this one out, as there has been far too much bias, all the way around this comedy.
Click to expand...
Jesus, you people are gullible.
 
ASHES said:
Who cares? If it is her, she's allowed to speak her mind.

Saying it a thousand times doesn't make it true.
Click to expand...

The House of Cards are crumbling.
 
redbeer said:
The House of Cards are crumbling.
Click to expand...
Yeah. We can agree on that. You think the system working as it should is crumbling though, and there you couldn't be more wrong. It is the Trump criminal enterprise that is crumbling.
 
VySky said:
She sounds like a real loon. But of course the good and impartial judge may disagree

She needs a gag order
Click to expand...

Why?
Is there any suspicion that she has any involvement in the case?

She is allowed to voice her opinion just as you or I am.
 
ASHES said:
Yeah. We can agree on that. You think the system working as it should is crumbling though, and there you couldn't be more wrong. It is the Trump criminal enterprise that is crumbling.
Click to expand...

Lol, your hatred is turning our judicial system into a nightmare.....I'll go ahead and thank you now, for the idiocy which is to come.
 
redbeer said:
Lol, your hatred is turning our judicial system into a nightmare.....I'll go ahead and thank you now, for the idiocy which is to come.
Click to expand...
Or, you could be wrong and Trump is a conniving conman and you're just stuck in a sunk cost fallacy situation.
 
ASHES said:
Or, you could be wrong and Trump is a conniving conman and you're just stuck in a sunk cost fallacy situation.
Click to expand...

Lol, the left are so far sunk in a "sunk cost fallacy" it's amazing to witness. They cannot stop now, just keep pouring the coals to the fire, else they will be seen who they are, lol.
 
redbeer said:
Lol, the left are so far sunk in a "sunk cost fallacy" it's amazing to witness. They cannot stop now, just keep pouring the coals to the fire, else they will be seen who they are, lol.
Click to expand...
I'm not beholden to any debts, but keep it up. It's a really good argument. 😆
 
redbeer said:
Lol, the left are so far sunk in a "sunk cost fallacy" it's amazing to witness. They cannot stop now, just keep pouring the coals to the fire, else they will be seen who they are, lol.
Click to expand...

How many times does Trump need to be in court before you see he's a fraud?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom