• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge delays ruling on whether to scrap Trump’s conviction in hush money case

VySky

VySky

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
51,132
Reaction score
20,174
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
So there you have it.

It will not come back in 4 years. lol..

-----SNORT----

=======================

NEW YORK (AP) — A judge is postponing a decision on whether to undo President-elect Donald Trump’s conviction in his hush money case because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.

New York Judge Juan M. Merchan had been set to rule Tuesday. Instead, he told Trump’s lawyers Tuesday he’d delay the ruling until Nov. 19.

According to emails filed in court, Trump’s lawyers asked for the delay over the weekend, arguing there are “strong reasons for the requested stay, and eventually dismissal of the case in the interests of justice.”
Click to expand...
 
VySky said:
So there you have it.

It will not come back in 4 years. lol..

-----SNORT----

=======================


Click to expand...
This will get crushed. It's a matter of time. Merchan is an idiot who likes his 15 minutes of fame. He allowed testimony from two witnesses from the Trump administration which included priveleged conversations that fall under the SCOTUS ruling on immunity. He's an ass.
 
This case was always meh to me. That fact that he refused to return government documents when directed and hid them from his lawyer and the government should have ended him. Absolutely a disgrace and an insult to anyone that ever had a security clearance.
 
TangoNoCash said:
This case was always meh to me. That fact that he refused to return government documents when directed and hid them from his lawyer and the government should have ended him. Absolutely a disgrace and an insult to anyone that ever had a security clearance.
Click to expand...
Is that like taking hammers to blackberries?
 
VySky said:
Is that like taking hammers to blackberries?
Click to expand...
Can’t say I know what you mean. Reason tells us when the government asks for their documents back you should give them to them. It’s been that way my entire life. You probably disagree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom