Judge Cannon Issues Baffling Order in Trump Document Case

[Anthony60]

LOL.


Does she?

Well, she hasn't worked with Hunter Biden.

 

[Anthony60]

Post a link to a recent, accurate post of yours.

No need, you just did.

 

[anatta]

Smith did not decide to charge Trump...the Grand Jury did...so, why would Garland block it?

I didnt say that. I responded to you "correction" to my post.

by ClaraD: Garland didn't sign off on anything except to assign a special counsel to deal with it. Smith is a Republican btw.

There is no point explaining dialog when what you see is the same thing I see. read the conversation please

 

[ClaraD]

I didnt say that. I responded to you "correction" to my post.

There is no point explaining dialog when what you see is the same thing I see. read the conversation please

You did say that...I responded directly to your post...where you claimed that Smith charged him...

 

[anatta]

Yes, it is happening. There are plenty of people who don't like Trump at all, who didn't vote for him or wouldn't vote for him again, but they can see the forest through the trees, and don't see it the way the TDS obsessed mob does. It doesn't mean they are on the Trump train. It means they think for themselves.
You should try it. It's extremely refreshing not to be pro kangaroo court. Your team wants this man gagged, imprisoned now without the benefit of giving him due process. You want to remove his protected speech rights. Don't lie because you know it is true. Anyone sees how wrong this way of thought is for the country gets jumped on and the usual traitor name calling crap starts. Read the forum, really read it, if you don't see it yet.

people won't see what they dont let themself see

 

[anatta]

You did say that...I responded directly to your post...where you claimed that Smith charged him...

OMG
read it, live with it. stop dragging out the dead mouse to prove your point.
I have no idea why many around here simply can't let posts die. There is nothing more grotesque then me going over
a post ( or series of posts) and trying to say something in a different different, or mount a new defense to defend what i already said

In short. Let things go ( not a personal criticism) . after the first time it's tedious and a vastly diminished return on effort

 

[DCCougar]

It's extremely refreshing not to be pro kangaroo court.

What it seems is extremely biased, especially using terms like "kangaroo court." What's next, you going to claim this is a witch hunt? Gee, I wonder where such terms come from.

 

[Michael Cole]

How dare she stand up for the rule of law?

She doesn't know the law. Ask the two Trump appointed judges on the 11th circuit appeals court.

 

[trixare4kids]

What it seems is extremely biased, especially using terms like "kangaroo court." What's next, you going to claim this is a witch hunt? Gee, I wonder where such terms come from.

Kangaroo court is an informal pejorative term for a court that ignores recognized standards of law or justice, carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides, and is typically convened ad hoc. A kangaroo court may ignore due process and come to a predetermined conclusion. The term is … See more

Many here, in what I refer to as the DP kangaroo court, would like to see Trump, who they freely label as a traitor without proof, to be put in jail right now in the midst of his campaigning. They think nothing about violating his civil liberties. They read into his words on his truth social site, furthering their own myopic, and biased agendas, and couldn't care less if it hurts the country. Nor do they give a damn about him being given due process or a fair trial but I should be used to this by now. They acted the same exact way when they carried on endlessly over the Trump/Putin collusion hoax.

 

[trixare4kids]

She doesn't know the law. Ask the two Trump appointed judges on the 11th circuit appeals court.

You have no proof for the above.

 

[trixare4kids]

people won't see what they dont let themself see

Oh boy, don't I ever know it.

 

[Michael Cole]

You have no proof for the above.

I have the 11th Circuit's smackdowns from last year. Where were you during the special master fiasco? There's a wealth of information available, including the 11th Circuit's ruling. I've read it. She got court slapped.

Cannon is an inexperienced hack. That was proven last September.

 

[ClaraD]

You have no proof for the above.

Her ruling on the documents...the 11th gave her a shut down of epic proportions.

 

[Overitall]

There will almost certainly be one judge who makes a mistake, after all there are so many cases, so many judges, it's almost certain one will make an error.

Thanks for conceding to my point. Now, should the defendant (should he be convicted) have his conviction overturned on appeal relative to that (those) mistakes?

 

[Mycroft]

I am not referring to Judge Cannon. You made the claim that the judge in DC was dishonest...so back it up.

 

[Callen]

people won't see what they dont let themself see

Oh boy, don't I ever know it.

.....ain't that the truth . Oh the irony!

 

[The AntiDonald]

Garland signs off on the SC..
it reminds me of so called walls of separation inside the WH between political and non political areas....it's a very porous barrier

Just as porous during the last administration. I would argue, much more so.

 

[ClaraD]

Kash Patel the guy that bought to fake whistleblowers for Congress? tell me you aren't buying bullshit....oh never mind....you would believe any bullshit that benefits you. Especially if you are posting from a site known for publishing bullshit.

 

[Mycroft]

Kash Patel the guy that bought to fake whistleblowers for Congress? tell me you aren't buying bullshit....oh never mind....you would believe any bullshit that benefits you.

Are you saying he's lying about that judge? Can you provide proof that he's lying? Hell, can you factually dispute a single thing he says about that judge?

If not, then your "shoot the messenger" tactic has failed.

 

[ClaraD]

Are you saying he's lying about that judge? Can you provide proof that he's lying? Hell, can you factually dispute a single thing he says about that judge?

If not, then your "shoot the messenger" tactic has failed.

they testified that he PAID them....yes, he is lying. It is also not a good look that you guys are trying to harass witnesses against Trump.

 

[Common Sense 1]

Smith did not decide to charge Trump...the Grand Jury did...so, why would Garland block it?

Garland is the approving authority. He has the final say. Everyone knows what is going on. Biden going after his opponent in the next presidential election.

 

[Jetboogieman]

without proof

Stop lying.

 

[j brown's body]

Yes, it is happening. There are plenty of people who don't like Trump at all, who didn't vote for him or wouldn't vote for him again, but they can see the forest through the trees, and don't see it the way the TDS obsessed mob does. It doesn't mean they are on the Trump train. It means they think for themselves.
You should try it. It's extremely refreshing not to be pro kangaroo court. Your team wants this man gagged, imprisoned now without the benefit of giving him due process. You want to remove his protected speech rights. Don't lie because you know it is true. Anyone sees how wrong this way of thought is for the country gets jumped on and the usual traitor name calling crap starts. Read the forum, really read it, if you don't see it yet.

It's called 'denial.'

 

[j brown's body]

Garland is the approving authority. He has the final say. Everyone knows what is going on. Biden going after his opponent in the next presidential election.

You know, we all pretty much watched Trump commit his crimes in real time. Where were you?

 

[Common Sense 1]

At the very least, Cannon will get removed from the trial.

Delusional posting. Judge Cannon won't be removed and the left will scream like they do over and over.