I've always liked the Duggars. I've always defended the Duggars when people called the crazy or weird or horrible for having so many kids. But this time..... this time.... I'm completely and utterly disgusted. I'm so disgusted that I'm having a hard time finding words to express it.
Unsealed police report reveals 'Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar covered up after eldest son Josh confessed to repeatedly fondling girls when he was a teen - and case only went to police in 2006 because of Oprah concerns' | Daily Mail Online
Josh Duggar apologizes amid molestation allegations: ‘I acted inexcusably’ - The Washington Post
I will never watch another episode of their show again.
They are crazy, weird, horrible zealots. Not surprised in the least.
I've always liked the Duggars. I've always defended the Duggars when people called the crazy or weird or horrible for having so many kids. But this time..... this time.... I'm completely and utterly disgusted. I'm so disgusted that I'm having a hard time finding words to express it.
Unsealed police report reveals 'Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar covered up after eldest son Josh confessed to repeatedly fondling girls when he was a teen - and case only went to police in 2006 because of Oprah concerns' | Daily Mail Online
Josh Duggar apologizes amid molestation allegations: ‘I acted inexcusably’ - The Washington Post
I will never watch another episode of their show again.
He was 14 at the time which means that his actions were not as "damning" (in the sense that he's a hardened abuser) as they would have been had he committed the abuse as an adult, but he was still old enough to know better even if he may not have understood the full extent of how his actions would affect his victims. From what I've read, it sounds like his family didn't get him or his sisters any serious therapy so any chance of a concerted effort at "rehabilitating" him seems to have been destroyed. Hopefully, he didn't continue his behavior as an adult, particularly considering he has children.
I've always liked the Duggars. I've always defended the Duggars when people called the crazy or weird or horrible for having so many kids. But this time..... this time.... I'm completely and utterly disgusted. I'm so disgusted that I'm having a hard time finding words to express it.
Unsealed police report reveals 'Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar covered up after eldest son Josh confessed to repeatedly fondling girls when he was a teen - and case only went to police in 2006 because of Oprah concerns' | Daily Mail Online
Josh Duggar apologizes amid molestation allegations: ‘I acted inexcusably’ - The Washington Post
I will never watch another episode of their show again.
Not necessarily in the sense that he was a hardened abuser. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't trust him near any child, but since he was 14, there's still a chance that this was a behavior he didn't take with him into adulthood. I hoping that's the case, anyhow.If it was sibling molestation as it appeared to be, it's still very damning.
I've always liked the Duggars. I've always defended the Duggars when people called the crazy or weird or horrible for having so many kids. But this time..... this time.... I'm completely and utterly disgusted. I'm so disgusted that I'm having a hard time finding words to express it.
Unsealed police report reveals 'Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar covered up after eldest son Josh confessed to repeatedly fondling girls when he was a teen - and case only went to police in 2006 because of Oprah concerns' | Daily Mail Online
Josh Duggar apologizes amid molestation allegations: ‘I acted inexcusably’ - The Washington Post
I will never watch another episode of their show again.
The report says that he molested 5 girls in an least two separate incidents. After the first time, the girls told their parents and their parents talked to him. Then, he did it again and the parents sent him to work on construction or something with relative as "therapy".I think the thing that matters most here would probably be the frequency, and intent. Once or twice, and he felt weird enough about it afterwards to voluntarily confess, and never engaged in the behavior again? That's one thing.
A more "chronic" behavioral problem would be another entirely.
They probably should have sent him to a psych program for evaluation and treatment. He was a minor so if he was in danger of developing into an adult offender he could have still be treated.What were they supposed to do? Send him straight to juvie?
5 girls, some of whom were his sisters, one was possibly 4 years old at the time.So, do I have this right?: under-aged 14 year-old Josh apparently fondled some other under-aged girls (other 14 year olds?).
I think the thing that matters most here would probably be the frequency, and intent. Once or twice, and he felt weird enough about it afterwards to voluntarily confess, and never engaged in the behavior again? That's one thing.
A more "chronic" behavioral problem would be another entirely.
I'm also honestly kind of confused as to why not reporting the incident to "law enforcement" is such a big deal here. That certainly wouldn't have been my first instinct, particularly if the behavior had already been corrected on the home front.
What were they supposed to do? Send him straight to juvie?
It's not like he's a hardened sexual predator here (as far as we know, anyway).
The report says that he molested 5 girls in an least two separate incidents. After the first time, the girls told their parents and their parents talked to him. Then, he did it again and the parents sent him to work on construction or something with relative as "therapy".
They probably should have sent him to a psych program for evaluation and treatment. He was a minor so if he was in danger of developing into an adult offender he could have still be treated.
At least a couple of the charges were felonies.
So, do I have this right?: under-aged 14 year-old Josh apparently fondled some other under-aged girls (other 14 year olds?).
I'm unsure if the reports are true or not but I wasn't terribly shocked to read a story about one of the daughters having sex in a closet during her wedding reception.
Frankly, that kind of thing is really up to the parents.
I don't put much faith in modern psychology. I suspect the Duggar family is the same.
It's also not like they ignored the problem anyway. They gave him counseling, and sent him away for treatment. It just wasn't the conventional variety. They also pretty clearly threatened him if the behavior continued, as evidenced by the conversation with the State Trooper.
We don't have any evidence to suggest that these "treatments" weren't ultimately effective in correcting his behavior, so I really don't see any reason to freak out over them.
So your first response would be to send a 14 year old kid to jail, and have him branded as a sex offender for life over something that might've simply been an immature mistake?
Personally, unless the behavior were to prove to be uncorrectable, it'd strike me as being the very definition of an "in house" problem.
I mean... Sure. Move him to a separate room, put locks on the doors to all his siblings' rooms, give him a damn stern talking to, seek counseling, and keep an eye on him just in case. However, I don't see any reason to jump straight to sending him "up the river."
That's a last resort, not the first.
When a crime is committed, the issue isn't in-house.
I beg to differ. Some transgressions legitimately require legal intervention, and some do not. Given what we know about the case, this would strike me as being the latter.
In any eventuality, I certainly wouldn't leap to ruin my child's life before it had even started (and my family's reputation in the process) over one or two questionable events that might very well prove to be correctable using less drastic means. I am a slave to neither law, nor societal conventions, and I reserve the right to defer to my own best judgement where my adherence to either is concerned.
I beg to differ. Some transgressions legitimately require legal intervention, and some do not. Given what we know about the case, this would strike me as being the latter.
In any eventuality, I certainly wouldn't leap to ruin my child's life before it had even started (and my family's reputation in the process) over one or two questionable events that might very well prove to be correctable using less drastic means. I am a slave to neither law, nor societal conventions, and I reserve the right to defer to my own best judgement where my adherence to either is concerned.
Hogwash. If he was 14 and molested a 4 year old, he needed help, not that it would have helped much anyway. Child molesters have a very high recidivism rate. If I were his wife, I'd certainly keep a close eye on my children. But she knew about this before she married him, which tells me that all she is concerned about is money and fame anyway.
Disgusting. I never watched the show. I appreciate why she had that many kids - she was unable to have kids, and made a promise to God that if He helped her have children, she'd have as many as she could to live for Him. So that's why she has so many kids - it was a promise to God. That being said, I've always wondered how she could truly be there for her kids, with that many. I mean, she has her own sweatshop. The older kids have to help be responsible for the younger kids, and that's not fair to them. When you have that many kids something is always going to slip by, and in this case, it was something horrible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?