- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 39,866
- Reaction score
- 41,399
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
We’ve had liberals for as long as we had a nation. I’ve witnessed every presidential election since JFK and there has never been a risk of violence from an election.Jonathan Turley writes about driving around D.C. during the last few days and being shocked by the boarded-up businesses and by the faculty/staff and students at George Washington University being advised to stockpile medicine and food “as you normally would for a hurricane or a snowstorm." He asks a good question: "When exactly did election rioting become as forecastable as inclement weather?" He goes on:
The forecast for rioting with a chance of passing looting and arson is being repeated across the country as if it is now an inconvenient truth of the political version of global warming.
A warm front moving in with “possible election related disruptions” is being reported like an electoral meteorological event.
The most likely disruption would come a close election or Trump lead. That risk is heightened after Democratic leaders like House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C. declared on Sunday that the only way Democrat Joe Biden could lose the election would be "for voter suppression to be successful."
Thus, if Trump is close or winning on election night, it can only be due to unlawful conduct. When President Trump made such statements about stealing the election, the media went into full alert over his laying the foundation for a coup.
Yet, the media seems entirely comfortable with Clyburn’s pre-election declaration that either Biden wins or the election is invalid. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/election-day-riots-liberal-media
Has your community been warned to expect "election-related disruptions"?
If there is a risk of violence this time around, it isn’t because of liberals, it’s because the Mango Mussolini riled up his base and encourages violence and disruption.
Nobody in the media is saying Biden can’t win or if he does it’s because of voter suppression. 538 acknowledges that Biden is likely to win but it’s not a certainty.