- Joined
- Nov 10, 2010
- Messages
- 17,066
- Reaction score
- 35,725
- Location
- DFW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Agreed.
But of course.
I'd further the obvious dishonesty in the MSM by pointing out this list of propaganda driven narratives they've in less than the last decade.
When each of these narratives, pushed by the Dem's MSM propagandists, fell, were proven false, the Dem's MSM propagandists destroyed their own credibility, as is shown in their falling trust and credibility polling results.
- 'The Steel dossier is real'?
- 'Hunter's laptop was Russia disinformation'?
- 'Inject bleach'?
- 'Joe's just fine'?
- 'Joe's on top of his game'?
- 'Russian Collusion'?
- 'Trump's a Russian asset'?
- The assassination attempt was staged.
- Trump was not actually injured by a bullet or at all.
- the “Muslim ban” that wasn’t?
- the mantra that the 2017 tax cuts were only for the “rich”
- the Ukraine impeachment of Trump, a creative fiction based on a complaint from an anonymous member of the swamp who never testified
- The Capitol Hill riot on Jan. 6 was an “armed insurrection”
- President Trump referred to Nazis and White supremacists as “very fine people.”
- President Trump “incited” the riot
- President Trump wanted to End NATO
- The border is secure
- Don't say gay laws
- Jim Crow 2.0
- Inflation is transitory
- Trump is a fascist
- Violent crime is falling
The Dem's MSM propagandists have destroyed themselves and rendered themselves irrelevant, the greatest irony being it was of their own violation, by their own actions and public statements. They have no one else to blame for their failing and irrelevant lot in life but themselves.
We are already seeing them whine about it, but this isn't demonstrating any insight or introspection, in fact, it is showing exactly the opposite.
Your equivocation is an incorrect one.
Your equivocation is an incorrect one.
You are equating the Dem's MSM propagandists use Pelosi's 'Wrap Up Smear' tactics instead of vetted news to a politician campaigning.
What you've done is demonstrate the your expectation and approval of the Dem's MSM propagandists campaigning for Democrats and the left. Well, in this you are correct, as that's all they've done since before 2016.
Specific to the 'Wrap Up Smear' tactic, I'll let Pelosi explain that in her own words in her own confession.
What’s your favorite part? Mine is when he calls them delusional.Ratings does not equal quality. William Hung sold over 1 million albums. Jerry Springer was on the air for 20 years. That doesn't mean they were quality.
Is anything what I posted not factual?No. I’m ridiculing your aggressive hypocrisy.
And all this time I thought it was Fox News who was lying to me when it turns out it was MSNBC and CNN all along! (but... but... but... Joe Rogan believes in dragons and licks Trump's nutsack!)
'I was just reading something about CNN's ratings and MSNBC's ratings post-election - they've crashed,' The Joe Rogan Experience podcast host said.
Podcaster Joe Rogan dunked on left-wing media for losing viewers as many Americans have grown distrustful and wary of their bias.
Rogan spoke on his podcast about a recent op-ed from billionaire Amazon founder and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos, headlined, "The hard truth: Americans don’t trust the news media."
He summarized the piece as "essentially saying that you have to take divergent viewpoints, you have to take a bunch of different perspectives, we can't just be this left-wing echo chamber, and it's the reason why the business is faltering."
click here to read... unless you are triggered by Fox News. If that's the case then here is your binky.
Would you care to give examples of his “disinformation”?Rogan preaching about any network being accurate is laughable.
The guy is a disinformation machine.
I have a feeling he doesn’t need the money.I guess that's why Rogan went from being a progressive to MAGA. There's money to be made.
And yet Fox’s ratings are through the roof.Bill O'Reilly said it better, paraphrase - "Journalism is dead in America. It doesn't matter what party or ideology you support, it is dead on both sides. In all the years I have been in broadcasting, over 50 years, the way you produced news was this - You get a story, you have a large staff of journalist to first go out and vet the story. Is there more than one source? Get them on record telling what they know. Reach out to whoever the story is about, get their take. And then - most important, validate what everyone tells you. That is gone. No one does any of that now. All they do is hear a story - and go straight to air with it, then bring in commentary that is going to talk about it as if it is 100% true."
BOTH SIDES.
I have a feeling he doesn’t need the money.
Maybe Andy Kaufman was feeling like a girl when he fought other girls. So what’s the problem here?I know you’re not suggesting a “girl” is a lesser opponent, right?
He had already made a small fortune before he backed Trump. Let’s not try to rewrite history. That’s MSNBC’s job.Not anymore, since he went from being progressive to MAGA.
Would you care to give examples of his “disinformation”?
He had already made a small fortune before he backed Trump.
That MSNBC has been retconning (rewriting history to suit the far left extremists) has been noticed by, and disliked by, their non-extremist audience, which is why they are in a ratings free fall.Let’s not try to rewrite history. That’s MSNBC’s job.
And yet Fox’s ratings are through the roof.
That MSNBC has been retconning (rewriting history to suit the far left extremists) has been noticed by, and disliked by, their non-extremist audience, which is why they are in a ratings free fall.
Ideally this would be MSNBC self-correcting, and this self-correction would also be adopted by the Dem's MSM propagandists, but we'll see, as the people who are running these organizations lack insight, introspection, connection with the real world and familiarity with non-extremists, being that they live and breathe in the liberal / progressive echo chamber, and have somehow come to the conclusion that this is all there is to reality and the real world.
It's the same point I've been making about the bifurcation of news media. The question is what changes this, because the divisions that exist within people still drive the demand for echo chambers, and we see that manifested in new environments like streaming and podcasts as well. Ultimately whatever is created is a reaction to what people want, and in part the demand creators can influence. The main problem now is the profit model still supports echo chambers.Bill O'Reilly said it better, paraphrase - "Journalism is dead in America. It doesn't matter what party or ideology you support, it is dead on both sides. In all the years I have been in broadcasting, over 50 years, the way you produced news was this - You get a story, you have a large staff of journalist to first go out and vet the story. Is there more than one source? Get them on record telling what they know. Reach out to whoever the story is about, get their take. And then - most important, validate what everyone tells you. That is gone. No one does any of that now. All they do is hear a story - and go straight to air with it, then bring in commentary that is going to talk about it as if it is 100% true."
BOTH SIDES.
A network whose internal memos expressed fear that reporting facts will enrage their viewers.
Would you care to give examples of his “disinformation”?
Because most of America are not woke-hive minded lunaticsAnd yet Fox’s ratings are through the roof.
Completely false.Joe Rogan listeners are looking for dude-bro entertainment dressed up as news/information.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?