Joe Biden, today--in response to an Atlantic article that claimed that President Trump had acted badly as regarding the military--declared that "if that is true," Donald Trump "owes an apology" to all who have served in the military.
Never mind that that gave credence to a very thinly sourced story.
In any case--and without missing a beat--he then proceeded to ask (with faux outrage): "Who does he think he is?"
No doubt, this will play well with his base.
I am not sure, however, that it will work with independents.
Joe Biden, today--in response to an Atlantic article that claimed that President Trump had acted badly as regarding the military--declared that "if that is true," Donald Trump "owes an apology" to all who have served in the military.
Never mind that that gave credence to a very thinly sourced story.
In any case--and without missing a beat--he then proceeded to ask (with faux outrage): "Who does he think he is?"
No doubt, this will play well with his base.
I am not sure, however, that it will work with independents.
Fox News confirmed the story....
Joe Biden, today--in response to an Atlantic article that claimed that President Trump had acted badly as regarding the military--declared that "if that is true," Donald Trump "owes an apology" to all who have served in the military.
Never mind that that gave credence to a very thinly sourced story.
In any case--and without missing a beat--he then proceeded to ask (with faux outrage): "Who does he think he is?"
No doubt, this will play well with his base.
I am not sure, however, that it will work with independents.
I think Independents will stack the claims of what Trump said against what he actually has said and conclude, "Yeah, that sounds about right."
thinly sourced?
it had 4 people confirm
Fox News confirmed the story....
Yes.
And all were "anonymous" sources.
I think Independents will stack the claims of what Trump said against what he is already known to have said and conclude, "Yeah, that sounds about right."
Joe Biden, today--in response to an Atlantic article that claimed that President Trump had acted badly as regarding the military--declared that "if that is true," Donald Trump "owes an apology" to all who have served in the military.
Never mind that that gave credence to a very thinly sourced story.
In any case--and without missing a beat--he then proceeded to ask (with faux outrage): "Who does he think he is?"
No doubt, this will play well with his base.
I am not sure, however, that it will work with independents.
Didn't you hear? Fox turned RINO/Obama Deep State a while ago.
OANN is the One Truth now.
Oh, like the fact that he has continually said that he has the highest regard for those who serve in the American military?
and that is how many important stories come out
always have
that is reputable reporting as we see here is so important
I would bet that he said it but it doesn't really matter whether he said it or not. It's him through and through.
So much regard that he pissed all over McCain's service.
And why, exactly, would you "bet that he said it"?
In any case, are we going to convict people--even in the court of public opinion--according to merely subjective criteria?
Donald Trump had a deep, personal distaste for the late John McCain. (It may be the result of McCain's fifty-first vote, which gave us ObamaCare.)
But no one ever said that Donald Trump automatically has a high regard for everyone who ever served in the military.
That would be moving the goalposts.
That is far too subjective.Because that's who he is.
He convicted himself with his own mouth years ago regarding his lack of respect for veterans and service members.
Well, yes.
And no.
It confirmed that The Atlantic ran such a story.
It did not, however, confirm the veracity of that story.
Far from it.
That is far too subjective.
And I simply do not accept anything--anything, without exception--as conclusive, if it is subjective.
If you are referring to the 2015 speech in which he (supposedly) described those who died in war as "losers" and "suckers," I will certainly not defend such words.
But it is questionable whether he actually uttered them.
Even CBS News and The New York Times--not exactly bastions of conservatism--have noted that President Trump denies ever having spoken such words.
Are you really certain that he did?
That is far too subjective.
And I simply do not accept anything--anything, without exception--as conclusive, if it is subjective.
If you are referring to the 2015 speech in which he (supposedly) described those who died in war as "losers" and "suckers," I will certainly not defend such words.
But it is questionable whether he actually uttered them.
Even CBS News and The New York Times--not exactly bastions of conservatism--have noted that President Trump denies ever having spoken such words.
Are you really certain that he did?
And why, exactly, would you "bet that he said it"?
In any case, are we going to convict people--even in the court of public opinion--according to merely subjective criteria?
So much regard that he pissed all over McCain's service.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?