Oh no, it works man.ZeroHedge says that a spokesperson was "angered" by someone else's question?
This is supposed to be fodder for a political discussion? The only way that works is if the subject is the sheer vapidity of modern political discussion.
Oh no, it works man.
Just not for you.
Didn't the Easter bunny just tell Joe it was time for his nap, or something?
Haha.
Didn't the Easter bunny just tell Joe it was time for his nap, or something?
Haha.
SHe's pissed that he's exposing their strategy of hiding the senile simp from the press.Oh no, it works man.
Just not for you.
"Zerohedge"
Not credible.
That was red in that suitDidn't the Easter bunny just tell Joe it was time for his nap, or something?
Haha.
Wallace repeatedly interrupted Psaki, firing new questions at her before she had even had a chance to address the previous. It is rude. I would characterize Psaki's handling of the rudeness as 'rightfully perturbed.' It was a case of Wallace attempting to initiate an argument, and Psaki patiently attempting to be polite with someone who was not.Chris stepping it up since he’s looking for work.
Poor slow Joe
——
In a Wednesday interview Chris Wallace grilled White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on why President Joe Biden seems to be carefully shielded from the press, resulting in her getting visibly agitated.
The tense exchange, which aired on the soon to be defunct CNN+, started with the former FOX host asking, "Why has President Biden been so sheltered from the press?" Watch Psaki grow flustered and increasingly upset while straining to present a smile:
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Works if you mean confuses R's further...Oh no, it works man.
Just not for you.
Yup. What a right wing stooge. Hand picking the number of press interviews he gave as an indication of how few press interviews he gave. Outrageous.Was that the right link? I watched, waiting for her to become "visibly angry." But didn't see that. What I did see was her pushing back from the erroneous contention of Biden being sheltered via use of hand picked stats like the number of interviews granted. If Trump invited a friendly reporter in from Faux news 75 times to loft him softball questions, is that really supposed to be an example of making himself available to the press?
Wallace repeatedly interrupted Psaki, firing new questions at her before she had even had a chance to address the previous. It is rude. I would characterize Psaki's handling of the rudeness as 'rightfully perturbed.' It was a case of Wallace attempting to initiate an argument, and Psaki patiently attempting to be polite with someone who was not.
The above is a lieWas that the right link? I watched, waiting for her to become "visibly angry." But didn't see that. What I did see was her pushing back from the erroneous contention of Biden being sheltered via use of hand picked stats like the number of interviews granted. If Trump invited a friendly reporter in from Faux news 75 times to loft him softball questions, is that really supposed to be an example of making himself available to the press?
You're gonna need a source for that garbage.Chris stepping it up since he’s looking for work.
Poor slow Joe
——
In a Wednesday interview Chris Wallace grilled White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on why President Joe Biden seems to be carefully shielded from the press, resulting in her getting visibly agitated.
The tense exchange, which aired on the soon to be defunct CNN+, started with the former FOX host asking, "Why has President Biden been so sheltered from the press?" Watch Psaki grow flustered and increasingly upset while straining to present a smile:
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Lol, irony is fun!!!The above is a lie
People who continue to worship Trump as you do have permanently forfeited the right to proclaim when someone else is supposedly lying. You folks simply don't know what it means.The above is a lie
I have forfeited nothingPeople who continue to worship Trump as you do have permanently forfeited the right to proclaim when someone else is supposedly lying. You folks simply don't know what it means.
Au contraire, you have forfeited quite a lot by continuing to fawn over that fraudster. Whether you admit it or not is immaterial.I have forfeited nothing
Meh. Trumps not my first pick. But if he’s on the ticket he gets my vote.Au contraire, you have forfeited quite a lot by continuing to fawn over that fraudster. Whether you admit it or not is immaterial.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?