• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking

Should I offer to represent her pro bono for the limited purpose of giving me the list and presenting it to the public? Paint a nice big fat target on my family's back . . .

Hopefully she's talking to her existing lawyers about it. It's not like they can permanently bar them from making attorney visits to her.
They cannot block attorney visits for ANY reason.
 
I asked you based on what you wrote. You tell me what this repost means.

W_Heisenberg said:
If there was nothing to hide, the Republicans wouldn't be blocking the release of the information.

All I know is that Trump won't allow the information to be released, and that all Republicans in the House, again, refused to pass legislation to force the information to be released.

This is very suspicious. It makes it seem like Trump is hiding something. What is Trump hiding?
 
All I know is that Trump won't allow the information to be released, and that all Republicans in the House, again, refused to pass legislation to force the information to be released.

This is very suspicious. It makes it seem like Trump is hiding something. What is Trump hiding?
Trump is hiding his many visits to Epstein's island as well as the fact that he raped a 13-year-old girl named Katie.
 
She’s toast.😵. Russians throw their people out of windows and call it suicide, we just hang ‘em and call it suicide.
 
Disregarded by who? The lone voice left on this thread defending Trump's epstein involvement? Even Anthony has managed to quietly slink away.

Whoa that's some moral authority you got there, Pal.

If the pic was a fake you could easily have played gotcha and proven it to us but now you're scared to even look it up.

LOL

Yep, it’s 100%real.

Taken by a British photographer named Dafydd Jones. It’s on the photographer’s website linked below.


That photographer has a number of photos. This is one of Epstein at Trump and Marla’s wedding.

 
Last edited:
So, did you write your Republican elected representative to complain about the blocking of the release of this information?
Ive never called or written a representative in my life. And I dont plan to do so now
 
SO you're in a retribution mode just like Trump.
Wouldn't those guys you know to be on the list have to be accused of a crime before you deny them your valuable vote or whose products you might buy?
If there is a list, and we cannot be sure at this point if one exists, any politician whose name is on the list would not get my vote. I know about innocent, until proven guilty, but I'm not in a courtroom. It's very unlikely anybody on the list would be an innocent little lamb.
 
I expect that all files that can be released will be released. Again, why did Biden just sit on them?

Because he or someone close to him is probably complicit?

I said at that time and I'll say it again now. We need to oust these pedos and those who knew full well what was going on.
 
Sorry, article title did not fit, they made it too long.

Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking her?​



View attachment 67579678

It's on now MAGA. Will you let Ghislaine testify before Congress on the Epstein files/list? If you choose to not believe her, that's fine. But what about those who want to see some resolution to this whole debacle?

So, what's the latest on the above? Is she or is she not happy to sit before Congress and tell her story?
Or will you finally concede the above is click bait compliments of the Daily Mail?
 
So, what's the latest on the above? Is she or is she not happy to sit before Congress and tell her story?
Or will you finally concede the above is click bait compliments of the Daily Mail?
It has not been confirmed or denied if you must know.
 
Sorry, article title did not fit, they made it too long.

Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking her?​



View attachment 67579678

It's on now MAGA. Will you let Ghislaine testify before Congress on the Epstein files/list? If you choose to not believe her, that's fine. But what about those who want to see some resolution to this whole debacle?

Why does she have to testify before Congress to tell what she knows? What is she waiting for?
 
If there is a list, and we cannot be sure at this point if one exists, any politician whose name is on the list would not get my vote. I know about innocent, until proven guilty, but I'm not in a courtroom. It's very unlikely anybody on the list would be an innocent little lamb.
I believe you would be sure to believe that last sentence.
Why waste separating the truly guilty from the prurient gawkers wanting two rub elbows with the elite?
If they're on that scuzzy island they must be up to no good, right?
Guilty until proven innocent.
 
Because he or someone close to him is probably complicit?
Perhaps. Or it could just be that Biden did not know where he was half the time.
I said at that time and I'll say it again now. We need to oust these pedos and those who knew full well what was going on.
I agree. If there is a list, client list or a list compiled from victims, it should absolutely be released, and I suspect it will be.
 
I believe you would be sure to believe that last sentence.
Why waste separating the truly guilty from the prurient gawkers wanting two rub elbows with the elite?

If they're on that scuzzy island they must be up to no good, right?
Guilty until proven innocent.
Not even close to what I posted. If there is a list, anybody whose name appears on the list would be guilty in my eyes.
 
Not even close to what I posted. If there is a list, anybody whose name appears on the list would be guilty in my eyes.
Of course they would. You're comfortable with those you don't like being guilty before they have a chance to defend themselves.
You apparently like being guilty by association.
You probably enjoyed the 1/6 kangaroo court hearings that went nowhere.
 
Of course they would. You're comfortable with those you don't like being guilty before they have a chance to defend themselves.
You apparently like being guilty by association.
You probably enjoyed the 1/6 kangaroo court hearings that went nowhere.
Kangaroo Court?? Tell me again how you didn't vote for trump. Only the strongest sycophants doubt the testimony of the witnesses, most of whom were Republicans who supported trump.
 
Kangaroo Court?? Tell me again how you didn't vote for trump. Only the strongest sycophants doubt the testimony of the witnesses, most of whom were Republicans who supported trump.
How many Republicans were part of the J6th kangaroo court tribune?

And how did that turn out?
 
How many Republicans were part of the J6th kangaroo court tribune?

And how did that turn out?
Obviously you never watched any of the hearings, so I won't take on the task of educating you. If you truly want an answer to either of the questions you posed, the answers are readily available online, or in print.
 
Obviously you never watched any of the hearings, so I won't take on the task of educating you. If you truly want an answer to either of the questions you posed, the answers are readily available online, or in print.
Here, I've done your research for you. There were only two Republicans on the committee to accuse Trump of whatever.
How long do you wish to continue this old argument which you are losing?

Here are the 9 lawmakers investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack​


Updated June 8, 20229:00 AM ET

By Barbara Sprunt
The panel comprises seven Democrats and two Republicans all appointed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. She previously rejected several GOP members originally selected for the panel by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy — Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana and Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio — citing "statements and actions" made by the pair that she felt would "impact the integrity of the committee." Both Banks and Jordan had publicly expressed concerns over the panel itself.
 
Here, I've done your research for you. There were only two Republicans on the committee to accuse Trump of whatever.
How long do you wish to continue this old argument which you are losing?

Here are the 9 lawmakers investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack​


Updated June 8, 20229:00 AM ET

By Barbara Sprunt
The panel comprises seven Democrats and two Republicans all appointed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. She previously rejected several GOP members originally selected for the panel by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy — Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana and Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio — citing "statements and actions" made by the pair that she felt would "impact the integrity of the committee." Both Banks and Jordan had publicly expressed concerns over the panel itself.
You wasted both your time and mine, since I watched the hearings and already knew that Cheney and Kinzinger were the only Republicans on the committee, which was due to McCarthy refusing to participate once Pelosi rejected Banks and Jordan, due to them being potential witnesses.
The vast majority of witness testimony was from trump supporting witnesses.
 
Back
Top Bottom