- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- Messages
- 28,824
- Reaction score
- 25,720
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Bondi is a lying criminal who takes bribes. She is unbelievable under ANY circumstances.Which time?
Bondi is a lying criminal who takes bribes. She is unbelievable under ANY circumstances.Which time?
They cannot block attorney visits for ANY reason.Should I offer to represent her pro bono for the limited purpose of giving me the list and presenting it to the public? Paint a nice big fat target on my family's back . . .
Hopefully she's talking to her existing lawyers about it. It's not like they can permanently bar them from making attorney visits to her.
I asked you based on what you wrote. You tell me what this repost means.
W_Heisenberg said:
If there was nothing to hide, the Republicans wouldn't be blocking the release of the information.
Trump is hiding his many visits to Epstein's island as well as the fact that he raped a 13-year-old girl named Katie.All I know is that Trump won't allow the information to be released, and that all Republicans in the House, again, refused to pass legislation to force the information to be released.
This is very suspicious. It makes it seem like Trump is hiding something. What is Trump hiding?
Disregarded by who? The lone voice left on this thread defending Trump's epstein involvement? Even Anthony has managed to quietly slink away.
Whoa that's some moral authority you got there, Pal.
If the pic was a fake you could easily have played gotcha and proven it to us but now you're scared to even look it up.
LOL
Ive never called or written a representative in my life. And I dont plan to do so nowSo, did you write your Republican elected representative to complain about the blocking of the release of this information?
If there is a list, and we cannot be sure at this point if one exists, any politician whose name is on the list would not get my vote. I know about innocent, until proven guilty, but I'm not in a courtroom. It's very unlikely anybody on the list would be an innocent little lamb.SO you're in a retribution mode just like Trump.
Wouldn't those guys you know to be on the list have to be accused of a crime before you deny them your valuable vote or whose products you might buy?
I expect that all files that can be released will be released. Again, why did Biden just sit on them?
You are now asking me to do your homework? If you want the images to be taken seriously, source them, otherwise they will be assumed as photoshopped and disregarded.
Sorry, article title did not fit, they made it too long.
Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking her?
![]()
Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal client list
'Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal. She would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story,' sources tell the Daily Mail.www.dailymail.co.uk
View attachment 67579678
It's on now MAGA. Will you let Ghislaine testify before Congress on the Epstein files/list? If you choose to not believe her, that's fine. But what about those who want to see some resolution to this whole debacle?
So, what's the latest on the above? Is she or is she not happy to sit before Congress and tell her story?
Or will you finally concede the above is click bait compliments of the Daily Mail?
It has not been confirmed or denied if you must know.So, what's the latest on the above? Is she or is she not happy to sit before Congress and tell her story?
Or will you finally concede the above is click bait compliments of the Daily Mail?
Sorry, article title did not fit, they made it too long.
Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking her?
![]()
Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal client list
'Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal. She would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story,' sources tell the Daily Mail.www.dailymail.co.uk
View attachment 67579678
It's on now MAGA. Will you let Ghislaine testify before Congress on the Epstein files/list? If you choose to not believe her, that's fine. But what about those who want to see some resolution to this whole debacle?
Well she's in prison so...Why does she have to testify before Congress to tell what she knows? What is she waiting for?
I believe you would be sure to believe that last sentence.If there is a list, and we cannot be sure at this point if one exists, any politician whose name is on the list would not get my vote. I know about innocent, until proven guilty, but I'm not in a courtroom. It's very unlikely anybody on the list would be an innocent little lamb.
Perhaps. Or it could just be that Biden did not know where he was half the time.Because he or someone close to him is probably complicit?
I agree. If there is a list, client list or a list compiled from victims, it should absolutely be released, and I suspect it will be.I said at that time and I'll say it again now. We need to oust these pedos and those who knew full well what was going on.
It has not been confirmed or denied if you must know.
I believe you would be sure to believe that last sentence.
Why waste separating the truly guilty from the prurient gawkers wanting two rub elbows with the elite?
Not even close to what I posted. If there is a list, anybody whose name appears on the list would be guilty in my eyes.If they're on that scuzzy island they must be up to no good, right?
Guilty until proven innocent.
Of course they would. You're comfortable with those you don't like being guilty before they have a chance to defend themselves.Not even close to what I posted. If there is a list, anybody whose name appears on the list would be guilty in my eyes.
Kangaroo Court?? Tell me again how you didn't vote for trump. Only the strongest sycophants doubt the testimony of the witnesses, most of whom were Republicans who supported trump.Of course they would. You're comfortable with those you don't like being guilty before they have a chance to defend themselves.
You apparently like being guilty by association.
You probably enjoyed the 1/6 kangaroo court hearings that went nowhere.
How many Republicans were part of the J6th kangaroo court tribune?Kangaroo Court?? Tell me again how you didn't vote for trump. Only the strongest sycophants doubt the testimony of the witnesses, most of whom were Republicans who supported trump.
Obviously you never watched any of the hearings, so I won't take on the task of educating you. If you truly want an answer to either of the questions you posed, the answers are readily available online, or in print.How many Republicans were part of the J6th kangaroo court tribune?
And how did that turn out?
Here, I've done your research for you. There were only two Republicans on the committee to accuse Trump of whatever.Obviously you never watched any of the hearings, so I won't take on the task of educating you. If you truly want an answer to either of the questions you posed, the answers are readily available online, or in print.
You wasted both your time and mine, since I watched the hearings and already knew that Cheney and Kinzinger were the only Republicans on the committee, which was due to McCarthy refusing to participate once Pelosi rejected Banks and Jordan, due to them being potential witnesses.Here, I've done your research for you. There were only two Republicans on the committee to accuse Trump of whatever.
How long do you wish to continue this old argument which you are losing?
Here are the 9 lawmakers investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack
Updated June 8, 20229:00 AM ET
By Barbara Sprunt
The panel comprises seven Democrats and two Republicans all appointed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. She previously rejected several GOP members originally selected for the panel by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy — Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana and Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio — citing "statements and actions" made by the pair that she felt would "impact the integrity of the committee." Both Banks and Jordan had publicly expressed concerns over the panel itself.