• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking

MAGAnificent said:
All of them? I assume you do not include the child pornography files in that demand.
Click to expand...

Stop moving goalposts. Trump could release the files now to clear his name. He won't, and you 100% know why.
 
MAGAnificent said:
You do understand that the Biden Justice Dept and FBI had possession of those files, right?
Click to expand...

And now the Trump administration has them. so,they should release them, right?
 
Puigb said:
And now the Trump administration has them. so,they should release them, right?
Click to expand...
Sure. Whatever can be legally released. Certainly not the child pornography. And there are files that will not be released while Maxwell's appeal is pending.
 
Airyaman said:
Sorry, article title did not fit, they made it too long.

Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking her?​


www.dailymail.co.uk

Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal client list

'Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal. She would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story,' sources tell the Daily Mail.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

View attachment 67579678

It's on now MAGA. Will you let Ghislaine testify before Congress on the Epstein files/list? If you choose to not believe her, that's fine. But what about those who want to see some resolution to this whole debacle?
Click to expand...
That is really interesting the Maxwell was never offered a plea deal. The Feds do that nearly with nearly all defendants. Her life's in danger for sure now and I guess she doesn't care given that they have thrown away the key.
 
MAGAnificent said:
Sure. Whatever can be legally released. Certainly not the child pornography. And there are files that will not be released while Maxwell's appeal is pending.
Click to expand...

Translation: Won't release anything that could implicate dear leader.
 
uptower said:
Sure. So they do exist? Help me here because Pam Blondi said there's no such thing.
Click to expand...


Trump said they were created by Obama, and Hillary, and Biden.
 
Airyaman said:
Could be as simple as wanting justice for 1000 women who were sex trafficked, and not allowing the rich and powerful to escape because they are rich and powerful.
Click to expand...
No one wants the precedent of going after Israeli, Qatari, Saudi, Brunei, Emirates, Ethiopian, Russian, Cypriot, Turkish and American sex trafficking networks.
 
911Sparky said:
I, for one, would like to know if any of the men on the list are politicians or businessmen whose products I use, I would never vote for, or knowingly buy the products of a pedophile.
Click to expand...
SO you're in a retribution mode just like Trump.
Wouldn't those guys you know to be on the list have to be accused of a crime before you deny them your valuable vote or whose products you might buy?
 
reinaert said:
No one wants the precedent of going after Israeli, Qatari, Saudi, Brunei, Emirates, Ethiopian, Russian, Cypriot, Turkish and American sex trafficking networks.
Click to expand...
Yeah, never thought about those possibilities, that this could be a multinational embarrassment.
 
What if...? said:
There really is no way they wouldn’t have known what was going on even if they didn’t “partake” themselves.

People with money eventually get tired of the “regular” things they get to enjoy that the poor don’t. And they move farther and farther into more and more extreme activities. Rock stars, athletes and yes, hedge fund managers etc.
Click to expand...
So someone who goes to a so-called 'titty' bar is also 'partaking' even if he is simply sitting there drinking and ogling the girls. And someone who went to Epstein's wouldn't be allowed to do that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom