• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jasmine Crockett calls Trump a 'piece of s---' during liberal rally

anatta

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
34,183
Reaction score
16,000
Location
daily dukkha
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
unhinged maniac
she’s confident that a Democratic candidate will win the 2028 presidential election, and laid out the strategy the party should have to secure that victory.

"But what are we going to need to do then?" she asked. "For me, it’s getting aggressive."

"Now listen, I’m not going to say that’s what we're going to do, but I’m telling y’all what my vision's [going to] be," she continued, pointing to limiting the Supreme Court, which she called "corrupt."

"We need to have some real guardrails around this Supreme Court because the Supreme Court has paved the way for half the stuff that we see that’s going on."

She then used the expletive against Trump but argued that it’s Congress and the high court that need to be reined in because they’re the institutions allowing him to implement his agenda.

"But in a functioning democracy, he still would not be able to get away with this. But he’s been able to get away with this because the House Republicans are complicit. He’s been able to get away with this because Senate Republicans are complicit. But most importantly, the courts, especially the Supreme Court, is complicit," she said.
 
unhinged maniac

And yet you can look at the thousands of unhinged caps only tweets spouting nonsense, interviews and press conferences where he just makes up shit and goes beserk from the unhinged lunatic you support and think "Yeah, that's fine".

Piece of shit is too kind a description of Trump and those who support him.
 
unhinged maniac
she’s confident that a Democratic candidate will win the 2028 presidential election, and laid out the strategy the party should have to secure that victory.

"But what are we going to need to do then?" she asked. "For me, it’s getting aggressive."

"Now listen, I’m not going to say that’s what we're going to do, but I’m telling y’all what my vision's [going to] be," she continued, pointing to limiting the Supreme Court, which she called "corrupt."

"We need to have some real guardrails around this Supreme Court because the Supreme Court has paved the way for half the stuff that we see that’s going on."

She then used the expletive against Trump but argued that it’s Congress and the high court that need to be reined in because they’re the institutions allowing him to implement his agenda.

"But in a functioning democracy, he still would not be able to get away with this. But he’s been able to get away with this because the House Republicans are complicit. He’s been able to get away with this because Senate Republicans are complicit. But most importantly, the courts, especially the Supreme Court, is complicit," she said.
Swearing is now the new Democrat politicians path to relevance?
 
unhinged maniac

Trump? Yeah. He's not just that. He's also a delusional piece of shit to boot. The loony claimed that Rosie O'Donnell is a threat to humanity.

I've never been entirely sure who that's supposed to be but he's been obsessed with her since some time before the 2016 campaign...
 
Swearing is now the new Democrat politicians path to relevance?
it appeals to the TDS crowd..I doubt it's relevant to the electorate -except that bunch
Aside from her "aggressive" appeal to such what struck me is the "guardrails around SCOTUS" statement.
It show she is so ****ing stupid she doesn't even begin to understand separation of powers
 
unhinged maniac
she’s confident that a Democratic candidate will win the 2028 presidential election, and laid out the strategy the party should have to secure that victory.

"But what are we going to need to do then?" she asked. "For me, it’s getting aggressive."

"Now listen, I’m not going to say that’s what we're going to do, but I’m telling y’all what my vision's [going to] be," she continued, pointing to limiting the Supreme Court, which she called "corrupt."

"We need to have some real guardrails around this Supreme Court because the Supreme Court has paved the way for half the stuff that we see that’s going on."

She then used the expletive against Trump but argued that it’s Congress and the high court that need to be reined in because they’re the institutions allowing him to implement his agenda.

"But in a functioning democracy, he still would not be able to get away with this. But he’s been able to get away with this because the House Republicans are complicit. He’s been able to get away with this because Senate Republicans are complicit. But most importantly, the courts, especially the Supreme Court, is complicit," she said.
What exactly did she get wrong? She seems surprisingly spot on with all of her assertions, including her characterization of Trump.

That all said, I do not care for crude language, I think it demeans all of us. It has no place in polite society, yet Trump is one of the worst offenders in public life today. If its good for the goose, then its good for the gander, but I do wish everyone would be more polite.
 
Last edited:
I just saw that today as well. Crockett is a punk, and then she tried to walk back the Hot Wheels comment like she did the punching comment
The Dems are sick puppies. Schumer gets blasted for keeping the government open..lol AOC and Bernie are socialist...what a mess

Crockett is well educated and acts the fool..meaning she is a fool
 
Calling a piece of shit a piece of shit is unhinged? Have you seen Trump's truth social timeline??

Now, now, that’s different…that’s always different when it’s dear leader. Then it just flips to words don’t matter, never even pay attention to words. .

Just a very short list of some of dear leader’s recent prolific commentary:

Loser
Major loser
I hate them.
Low IQ individual
Second rate
Newscum
Weak and stupid
Dope

He’s called Powell a loser, major loser, total loser, too stupid, even called him names on a world stage, of course Powell is none of those things, and none of the others he applies his name calling to are those things either.
 
Last edited:
unhinged maniac
she’s confident that a Democratic candidate will win the 2028 presidential election, and laid out the strategy the party should have to secure that victory.

"But what are we going to need to do then?" she asked. "For me, it’s getting aggressive."

"Now listen, I’m not going to say that’s what we're going to do, but I’m telling y’all what my vision's [going to] be," she continued, pointing to limiting the Supreme Court, which she called "corrupt."

"We need to have some real guardrails around this Supreme Court because the Supreme Court has paved the way for half the stuff that we see that’s going on."

She then used the expletive against Trump but argued that it’s Congress and the high court that need to be reined in because they’re the institutions allowing him to implement his agenda.

"But in a functioning democracy, he still would not be able to get away with this. But he’s been able to get away with this because the House Republicans are complicit. He’s been able to get away with this because Senate Republicans are complicit. But most importantly, the courts, especially the Supreme Court, is complicit," she said.
Yes? So? And?

Didn't trump just tell the minority senate leader, to "GO TO HELL"?
unhinged maniac

If the shoe fits, wear it.
 
Back
Top Bottom