January 6th Committee reaches agreement with Ginni Thomas to be interviewed

[CaughtInThe]

SCJ's wife in on the attempted insurrection. An ex-president steals our top secret stuff. Red Governors lying to immigrants and shipping them around for publicity.

The bad stuff will never end.

 

[CaughtInThe]

 

[Gateman_Wen]

SCJ's wife in on the attempted insurrection. An ex-president steals our top secret stuff. Red Governors lying to immigrants and shipping them around for publicity.

The bad stuff will never end.

Interviews are nice.

Let's skip that and go straight to the interrogation instead.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Interviews are nice.

Let's skip that and go straight to the interrogation instead.

like it or not, they have to be really careful because of WHO her husband is.

if it were you you'd probably be in Shawshank by now.

 

[Razoo]

CRIMINALS have rights ...........

 

[noonereal]

SCJ's wife in on the attempted insurrection. An ex-president steals our top secret stuff. Red Governors lying to immigrants and shipping them around for publicity.

The bad stuff will never end.

Agreement?

The fat traitor bitch should have been dragged in long ago.

Can you imagine how important and entitled this horrible woman is?

 

[MamboDervish]

SCJ's wife in on the attempted insurrection. An ex-president steals our top secret stuff. Red Governors lying to immigrants and shipping them around for publicity.

The bad stuff will never end.

The January 6th congressional public hearings are easily the most entertaining thing on broadcast television. September 28th can't come soon enough for me. It's already marked on my calendar.

 

[Jacksprat]

Creepy to think the wife of a Supreme Court Justice is in a conspiracy to overthrow the government.

 

[Michael Cole]

like it or not, they have to be really careful because of WHO her husband is.

if it were you you'd probably be in Shawshank by now.

Agreed, and unless Gini plans on spilling the beans, I see no benefit to the committee from her interview. I don't think Gini is entering this honestly.

 

[Fearandloathing]

like it or not, they have to be really careful because of WHO her husband is.

if it were you you'd probably be in Shawshank by now.

Her husband needs to be very careful in the wake of Roe.

Ultimately he answers to other judges and lawyers. But also to the public. I see the nation poised for conflict; when the rioting starts does anyone think the Supreme court will be off limits to mob justice?

I can't imagine any fiction writer making this shit up. You've got your basic madman resentful over a 'stolen' election, a bought & paid for right wing supremely stoopid court, mob justice and a justices wife playing glory politics on the side. all you need is a sexy angle and you have a Bruce Willis blockbuster. (If Bruce has anymore blockbusters in him)

I wonder if her "attorney" has advised her she will be under oath and the committee members already have the answers to the questions they intend to ask. Were I her attoney I would advise a 6 month round the world cruise.

 

[Parrish]

Give her a Coke to wet her whistle as she testifies.

 

[NWRatCon]

Interviews are nice.

Let's skip that and go straight to the interrogation instead.

Let's skip that and go straight to arraignment.

 

[CaughtInThe]

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Agreed, and unless Gini plans on spilling the beans, I see no benefit to the committee from her interview. I don't think Gini is entering this honestly.

Maybe she sees this as her opportunity to capture the "Most Invocations of the Fifth Amendment in a Single Day" title.

 

[Buckeyes85]

Not good for him if true, but I'm curious as to the source of this information and failed to disclose in what context?

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Not good for him if true, but I'm curious as to the source of this information and failed to disclose in what context?

Not a problem. He simply forgot that she had received the money (or, alternatively, she didn't tell him that she received the money and he never happened to notice the bank deposit [or alternatively, when he asked if she got any "money" she told him no - because all she received was a "cheque" and "cheques" are not "money"]).

 

[CaughtInThe]

 

[NWRatCon]

Ginni Thomas is typical of someone with an addictive personality type. She has acknowledge having previously fallen into a cult. The Eagerness of Ginni Thomas (NYT, Subscription)

You don’t have to be a left-wing, anti-Trump minion of the deep state to think it’s a bad look for American democracy to have the wife of a Supreme Court justice implicated in a multitentacled scheme to overturn a free and fair presidential election. But that is where this political moment finds us.

A longtime conservative crusader, Ms. Thomas increasingly appears to have been chin deep in the push to keep Donald Trump in power by any means necessary. Her insurrection-tinged activities included hectoring everyone from state lawmakers to the White House chief of staff to contest the results. She also swapped emails with John Eastman, the legal brains behind a baroque plot to have Vice President Mike Pence overturn the election that may have crossed the line from sketchy into straight-up illegal. Along the way, Ms. Thomas peddled a cornucopia of batty conspiracy theories, including QAnon gibberish about watermarked ballots in Arizona.

Someone who has a demonstrated history of such behavior has a predilection to recurrence, as is readily apparent, here. Do You Have an Addictive Personality? (WebMD) She has merely exchanged one rabbit-hole for another.

 

[CaughtInThe]

You don’t have to be a left-wing, anti-Trump minion of the deep state to think it’s a bad look for American democracy to have the wife of a Supreme Court justice implicated in a multitentacled scheme to overturn a free and fair presidential election. But that is where this political moment finds us.

yeah. it's beyond anything i thought i would see.