She wasn't under the gun of threatened prosecution from all directions. She also faced a real bipartisan committee that was focused on a specific issue.
Yeah, we know that. It's an actual conservative-leaning newspaper with an impressive pedigree, not a MAGAphone conspiracy factory.
You are incapable of repudiating anything I post because I am always right.
Can you support your implicit contention that congressional leadership was repeatedly denying requests for NG support? I saw them repeatedly requesting them as they were holed up in the depths of the Capitol. Not that they have the authority to do so, mind you. The NG answers to the President of the United States, not Congress.
As you've seen explained many times here and other places, the congressional committee is not pursuing a criminal investigation, but facts in support of legislative recommendations. As part of this, they will draw conclusions as to who did what and will present a report that will outline further measures to protect the integrity of elections should one madman and his cohorts author and/or promote conspiracy after conspiracy of "theory in search of evidence." (Guiliani)
It's posturung from Trump. He will never testify, it's perjury in the bag.
lol. Really? That's very old news. The sergeants-at-arms denied multiple requests to have the national guard on hand. When they finally did request help during the riot, the NG had to mobilize and respond.
www.npr.org
LOL. Bet that was a real nail-biter vote. As if we needed any more evidence that the entire proceeding is a pre-ordained Stalinesque show trial...,9 yes votes to 0 no votes. DJT is to be subpoenaed as agreed minutes ago.
Yeah, I read that article ages ago. Stg at Arms Irving rebuffed the offers and resigned. I thought you said Congressional leadership.lol. Really? That's very old news. The sergeants-at-arms denied multiple requests to have the national guard on hand. When they finally did request help during the riot, the NG had to mobilize and respond.
The president isn't in the chain. The capitol has to request the support from the secretary of the army. In this case, they sent assistance when requested - there within 3 hours. It was just too late once the riot started.
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.
Oh, I don't much doubt they'll pass along their treasure trove of evidence to the DOJ, but there is a clear need for a fact-finding commission after a failure like that. What caused it? Who responded to it? Who was supposed to respond to it and failed to do so? Who was supposed to foresee the problem and how or why did they fail at preventing the breech? Why did Trump's Republican VP come under the attack of Trump supporters attacking the Capitol? The report is going to be massive. There were so many failures, but one real cause.
I get it. It's not easy for your side to lose a hotly contested election. Then to be lied to repeatedly, told of countless conspiracies of fraud that turn out to be more lies. I remember when Trump (unexpectedly to me) won in 2016. I would have initially believed some wild and crazy excuses to explain how such a loser could have been elected President of the US. Turns out, however, people voted for him. That's what happened.
Um, she had an entire right wing party screaming lock her up.
Trump isn't running for election.
Trump was asked to testify long ago. Why does he need a subpoena?
Really? You wouldn't guess that looking at the Democratic party's campaign strategy. They seem to have gone all in on the 45th president and making the election a referendum about him.
Because he's got no intention of voluntarily gracing this monkey trial with his presence. Why give them the publicity? They deserve to be shut down and forgotten.
So, you support fascism.
Yes - congressional leadership. So now you did see it? And yet, those questions weren't asked
Not the same. And you're confused about the timing.
Right? You wouldn't know that from Democrats though. I guess running against Trump is easier than running on their record.
