As I said above, this is a very dangerous way of thinking. They are taking the rule of law away from the justice system and putting it in the hands of the party.
I know, gotta defend the democracy hating anti Americans.To get the absolute truth, I went to MSNBC to gather some info...
They said he, and others, gave "reconnaissance tours". Not just tours. Of course, you have some proof of that, right?
I mean, when you accuse a sitting Congressman of planning an attack on the Capitol, you need to show what you have that proves it was for recon for that attack.
His statement was that he didn't give any "reconnaissance tours". And, until we see some proof that he gave "reconnaissance tours", it looks like the committee is lying.
So, it's on them to show he gave a "reconnaissance tour". Not just a tour. When do you suppose they will show their proof?
Oh, they never entered the Capitol building, so that's going to be a tough one. I know the "committee" would never say anything like that without absolute proof. Maybe they just misplaced it?
Yes, also known as the enemy of the state.I know, gotta defend the democracy hating anti Americans.
Plus this added information given by Loudermilk when interviewed on a radio show.The truth is he lied about giving any tours, then when confronted with evidence he did, he changed his tune. Why did he lie?
"“A constituent family with young children meeting with their Member of Congress in the House office buildings is not a suspicious group or ‘reconnaissance tour.’ The family never entered the Capitol building,” Mr. Loudermilk wrote in a joint statement with Representative Rodney Davis of Illinois, the top Republican on the House Administration Committee, adding: “No place that the family went on the 5th was breached on the 6th, the family did not enter the Capitol grounds on the 6th, and no one in that family has been investigated or charged in connection to January 6th.”
It also doesn't mean that the suspected activity shouldn't be looked into. Rep Loudermilk has done too much zig zagging with what he's told so far. If he's squeaky clean, it'll show in the final report only proving that he likes zig zagging when he speaks.It doesn't stand up to the slightest scrutiny. Of course, those pushing it give it no scrutiny at all.
Many criminals are caught in this manner. Investigations tend to roll this way. Relax.Things get very dangerous when we start pointing fingers and trying to link up events as cause and effect.
It's kind of stupid to make the leap that if he showed some people around, then he must have been doing it to help people attack the building. Was he the only Congressman to show someone around? I doubt that. And, I thought I heard it was the day before? That makes it even more unlikely.
This is put out there for the low information, low IQ types that will swallow it without question. Evil needs those type of people.
Yep, a whole stack of names that the Democrat party came up with, to refer to the AG. Of course, Congress is a legislative body, they do not conduct criminal investigations. The DOJ has no grounds to call any of these people in for "questioning". But, the Democrat party did it for them, even though that's not their job. This whole thing stinks.Total BS. They aren’t taking anything away from Justice. They’re getting ready to refer a stack of names and evidence to them.
Completely irrelevant. There is no indication of anything that needs to be investigated. He's calling for them to look at the camera footage. Why do you think they are not doing that? That would clear things right up. That's probably why they aren't looking at it.I know, gotta defend the democracy hating anti Americans.
The truth is he lied about giving any tours, then when confronted with evidence he did, he changed his tune. Why did he lie?
"“A constituent family with young children meeting with their Member of Congress in the House office buildings is not a suspicious group or ‘reconnaissance tour.’ The family never entered the Capitol building,” Mr. Loudermilk wrote in a joint statement with Representative Rodney Davis of Illinois, the top Republican on the House Administration Committee, adding: “No place that the family went on the 5th was breached on the 6th, the family did not enter the Capitol grounds on the 6th, and no one in that family has been investigated or charged in connection to January 6th.”
So you believe this liar?
So, you mean the old, "If he's not guilty of anything, then why won't he come in and answer questions?" Right?It also doesn't mean that the suspected activity shouldn't be looked into. Rep Loudermilk has done too much zig zagging with what he's told so far. If he's squeaky clean, it'll show in the final report only proving that he likes zig zagging when he speaks.
Congress is not supposed to do criminal investigations. That's DOJ. At least, until now.Many criminals are caught in this manner. Investigations tend to roll this way. Relax.
Right, sure.It's not stupid at all.
What stinks is an attack on our capitol and multiple coup plots never seen in America before. So yes, we need to know all we can about this. The DOJ can sort out who is criminal and who is just a democracy hating republican. It won't come soon enough.Yep, a whole stack of names that the Democrat party came up with, to refer to the AG. Of course, Congress is a legislative body, they do not conduct criminal investigations. The DOJ has no grounds to call any of these people in for "questioning". But, the Democrat party did it for them, even though that's not their job. This whole thing stinks.
Congress is not doing a criminal investigation, the DOJ is. Congress cannot be silent if they come across a federal crime. They are obligated to pass it to the DOJ. Been going on in America like this for many years.Congress is not supposed to do criminal investigations. That's DOJ. At least, until now.
But it's not taking that long. Watergate, over 3 years. Whitewater over 3 years. This committee intends to wrap up later this summer. Will end up being 13 or 14 months.How many years is this Jan 6 Panel ala witch hunt going to go on?
Is it taking so long because of irrelevant digging or because of obstructionist witnesses or grandstanding by both sides of the aisle or a combination of all of the above?
That is 10 to 12 months way too long!But it's not taking that long. Watergate, over 3 years. Whitewater over 3 years. This committee intends to wrap up later this summer. Will end up being 13 or 14 months.
Kida was like a tour for some, given that LEOs were holing the door open for them.
Capitol police appeared to let a mass of Trump demonstrators right into the Capitol building at one entry point Wednesday after the crowd breached the perimeter surrounding the complex. "I ...https://nypost.com › 2021 › 01 › 07 › capitol-police-hold-door-for-pro-trump-protesters-video-showsJan 7, 2021A Capitol police officer was seen politely holding the door for pro-Trump protesters to walk out of the building after causing mayhem that forced lawmakers to barricade themselves inside.
This only serves to deflate the left's overblown hyperventilation, politically driven push narrative for perceived political advantage of the day's events, and deflates the J6 'House Select Committee', revealing it being politically driven political Kabuki theater, which has been observed and proven correct, since it's first day.
As long as the Democrats are in control of the House and believe it to be a political advantage to them.How many years is this Jan 6 Panel ala witch hunt going to go on?
Nope. See comment above.Is it taking so long because of irrelevant digging or because of obstructionist witnesses or grandstanding by both sides of the aisle or a combination of all of the above?
You do realize the members of the committee have other duties within the congress. They have interviewed nearly 1000 witnesses. They have had many, many people refuse their subpoenas and wind up in court. I can't imagine how they could be moving any faster unless the non-cooperators were cooperating.That is 10 to 12 months way too long!
Yep, a whole stack of names that the Democrat party came up with, to refer to the AG. Of course, Congress is a legislative body, they do not conduct criminal investigations. The DOJ has no grounds to call any of these people in for "questioning". But, the Democrat party did it for them, even though that's not their job. This whole thing stinks.
You guys thought Hillary had a pedo ring in the basement of a pizze place with no basement.Right, sure.
They're gathering facts and causes related to the 1/6/21 assault on our Capitol. Rep Loudermilk is being looked into by the Committee within their guidelines to do so . If something criminal is discovered, they could then make a referral to the DOJ.Congress is not supposed to do criminal investigations. That's DOJ. At least, until now.
It means that suspicions has been raised about Rep Loudermilk and the 1/6/21 assault on our Capitol. The Committee has every right to question any Congress Critter that may have information about that assault. They may also question others who may have information or played a role into that assault. Much like connecting dots.So, you mean the old, "If he's not guilty of anything, then why won't he come in and answer questions?" Right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?