English class? English is not my native language but I can speak and write impeccable English - better than most americans.
That the "minimum" of ethnic strife involves hundreds of thousands of people fleeing for their lives.Your point?
That the "minimum" of ethnic strife involves hundreds of thousands of people fleeing for their lives.
You said that we had kept ethnic strife in Iraq to a minimum.You're connecting two loosely related things and implying that one caused the other.
You said that we had kept ethnic strife in Iraq to a minimum.
I pointed out that the "minimum" involved at least hundreds of thousands of people fleeing for their lives.
What causation are you talking about?
Was the civil war another example of the "minimum" ethnic strife?The "causation" is that our invasion is what motivated a mass exodus from Iraq, not the subsequent civil war. The minimum doesn't involve anyone fleeing from anything, the invasion and the refugees are only loosely related.
Was the civil war another example of the "minimum" ethnic strife?
Freedom cannot be brought by foreigners with a gun.
Yes, we did.
Not me personally.
But, I think that the vast majority of people who were telling me about Iraq being the "first domino" of freedom and democracy in the Arab world held their beliefs with sincerity. I suspect that some non-insignificant number of them have feelings consternation about the state of affairs in Iraq today.
I think that is an incorrect statement in that generality and has amply bin falsified. But people here and abroad like it, because it seems to justify their irresposibility and/or cowardice.
It's not an incorrect statement. If the People do not resolve themselves to fight and keep freedom, you can never bring them freedom. Any gain will be but temporary and without the outside pressure, the full of it would fall apart. Freedom requires the hearts and minds of the People. It cannot be delivered, it cannot be bought, it cannot be gifted. It must be earned by those whom wish to wield it, and they must resolve themselves to keep it.
That is much closer to the truth, though, still a little off and demands totally different policies than the earlier statement. What it means, you see, is that outsiders can bring the possibility of freedom and can do things to help. In the one case it would be stupid to intervene. In the other in can make sense and every situation has to be dealt with on its own merits.
So you say.Actually, Iraq was the first domino of freedom and democracy.
So you say.
post hoc ergo propter hoc
It takes more than one thing occurring after another to decide that the first thing caused the second.
It's quite possible that the invasion of Iraq slowed down the Arab Spring
Just after WWII and during the cold war. Yes Arab Spring came after the US decided to "commit itself" to the region.There was little to no such thought as an arab spring until after the US committed itself to the region.
You're welcome to believe that.The imagery of Iraqi's going to polls and actively engaging in the fate of their country I think put hope in many middle eastern countries citizens that if they rose up that they would receive aid from the international community. ... I don't think that would have occurred if we had not gotten involved in Iraq.
The role of social media has been well documented. It allowed people to coordinate, motivate, and demonstrate in ways which they could not previously.And with the help of social media...
The Arab World lacked courage previously?...they finally had the courage to rise up.
Just after WWII and during the cold war. Yes Arab Spring came after the US decided to "commit itself" to the region.
I also came after the formulation of Germ Theory and after the invention of the automobile.
You're welcome to believe that.
Did you decide to believe that based on reliable data which reflect the opinions of people living in the Arab World who participated in the Arab Spring?
Yes. If you look around the ME the status quo seemed to be one of religious rigidity. Where as now, we are beginning to see more a sense that secularism and democracy are at least becoming more favorable than ever before in the history of the middle east.The Arab World lacked courage previously?
Can you share the data you have observed?Based on observation..
It cannot be brought with foreigners with guns. Foreigners with guns may be able to help a united and resolved People; but there is two fold problem. First it takes the united and resolved People, without that there is no hope. The other is that foreigners with guns have no proper right or say in the affairs and governments of others. Government derives its legitimacy through the consent of the governed. If you are not part of the governed, you have no proper say.
So Germany and Japan were never freed?
The demographics and culture of Germany and Japan are a bit different from modern day Iraq, but if we ignore the apples to oranges comparison Germany and Japan were conquered.
Conquered in only the loosest definition of the word. We did not attempt to integrate Germany and Japan into the United States but instead allowed their people to set up their governments.
Also, I guess you missed my edit. The United States would not exist today if it weren't for "foreigners with guns," and it was never liberated according to your definition of liberation.
Alright, for argument's sake let's stick with your definition of "conquered." Does that preclude them having been freed?No the German and Japanese people were conquered, defeated, and told what to do afterwards. We made sure they set up governments more favorable to us.
Again apples to oranges because the Japanese and Germans were a united people, where as Iraq is fractured into competing entities. Same with the US when it started. If we spent our time fighting ourselves continually and on large scale instead of the British, no number of French guns could have led to a functioning and sustained American government.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?