• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

It's time for deniers of human-caused global warming to stop using an old magazine story against climate scientists

watsup

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2020
Messages
47,360
Reaction score
26,059
Location
Springfield MO
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
This article is by the author of the study that showed that the Earth was supposedly cooling:

“(Inside Science) -- "The central fact is that, after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the Earth seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century."Newsweek: April 28, 1975

That's an excerpt from a story I wrote about climate science that appeared almost 40 years ago. Titled "The Cooling World," it was remarkably popular; in fact it might be the only decades-old magazine story about science ever carried onto the set of a late-night TV talk show. Now, as the author of that story, after decades of scientific advances, let me say this: while the hypotheses described in that original story seemed right at the time, climate scientists now know that they were seriously incomplete. Our climate is warming -- not cooling, as the original story suggested.

Nevertheless, certain websites and individuals that dispute, disparage and deny the science that shows that humans are causing the Earth to warm continue to quote my article. Their message: how can we believe climatologists who tell us that the Earth's atmosphere is warming when their colleagues asserted that it's actually cooling?

I'm sure it's clear by now that I accept the views of the National Academy, National Climate Assessment, Mann, and the huge majority of his fellow climatologists. Nevertheless, websites devoted to denying the existence of human-caused climate change – or at least promoting the idea that nothing should be done about it – continue to use my article to validate their thinking. In fact the article has reportedly become the most-cited article in Newsweek's history.




NASA change chart

Media credits
NASA and the National Climate Assessment


Those that reject climate science ignore the fact that, like other fields, climatology has evolved since 1975. The certainty that our atmosphere is indeed warming stems from a series of rigorous observations and theoretical concepts that fit into computer models and an overall framework outlining the nature of Earth's climate.”


 

It's time for deniers of human-caused global warming to stop using an old magazine story against climate scientists​

No. It is time for human cause global warming claimers to stfu.
 
Why? Are you against science?
I've always wondered since there's science for and against - and apparently science is never wrong - who's correct?
 
You haven't and can't show the science promoted by the "alarmists" is good, let alone unchallengeable.
Shouldn’t one have a background in science to make value claims about it?
 
It's time for climate change alarmists to realize that a changing climate has always been a factor in the natural evolution of life on earth. Jeeze Louise what's a degree or two change in temp? It's been happening since before humans evolved from apes. Humans can predict the weather but they can't change it. Not yet anyway.
 
Why? Are you against science?

Didn't science once say that "entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000"?

 
It's time for climate change alarmists to realize that a changing climate has always been a factor in the natural evolution of life on earth. Jeeze Louise what's a degree or two change in temp? It's been happening since before humans evolved from apes. Humans can predict the weather but they can't change it. Not yet anyway.
Spoken like someone who just got done with his rocks for jocks class but missed the bigger picture of how science works.
 
No. It is time for human cause global warming claimers to stfu.

It's not your place to enforce your censorship of science. :)
 
This article is by the author of the study that showed that the Earth was supposedly cooling:

“(Inside Science) -- "The central fact is that, after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the Earth seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century."Newsweek: April 28, 1975

That's an excerpt from a story I wrote about climate science that appeared almost 40 years ago. Titled "The Cooling World," it was remarkably popular; in fact it might be the only decades-old magazine story about science ever carried onto the set of a late-night TV talk show. Now, as the author of that story, after decades of scientific advances, let me say this: while the hypotheses described in that original story seemed right at the time, climate scientists now know that they were seriously incomplete. Our climate is warming -- not cooling, as the original story suggested.

Nevertheless, certain websites and individuals that dispute, disparage and deny the science that shows that humans are causing the Earth to warm continue to quote my article. Their message: how can we believe climatologists who tell us that the Earth's atmosphere is warming when their colleagues asserted that it's actually cooling?

I'm sure it's clear by now that I accept the views of the National Academy, National Climate Assessment, Mann, and the huge majority of his fellow climatologists. Nevertheless, websites devoted to denying the existence of human-caused climate change – or at least promoting the idea that nothing should be done about it – continue to use my article to validate their thinking. In fact the article has reportedly become the most-cited article in Newsweek's history.




NASA change chart

Media credits
NASA and the National Climate Assessment


Those that reject climate science ignore the fact that, like other fields, climatology has evolved since 1975. The certainty that our atmosphere is indeed warming stems from a series of rigorous observations and theoretical concepts that fit into computer models and an overall framework outlining the nature of Earth's climate.”



What's needed is non-politicized science. The concept of man-made climate change is cultish quackery.
 
It's not your place to enforce your censorship of science. :)
Is that what you think I was trying to do? Interesting. Absurd, but interesting nonetheless.
 
Well people who know this science better than you disagree

But then there are people of science who agree with my point of view as well. The science has been politicized from the very beginning and honest peer review has been tossed aside.
 
Is that what you think I was trying to do? Interesting. Absurd, but interesting nonetheless.

Oh, you were just whining. Feel free to continue. :)
 
It's time for climate change alarmists to realize that a changing climate has always been a factor in the natural evolution of life on earth. Jeeze Louise what's a degree or two change in temp? It's been happening since before humans evolved from apes. Humans can predict the weather but they can't change it. Not yet anyway.

Changing climate blah blah blah. More denier talking points.
 
But then there are people of science who agree with my point of view as well. The science has been politicized from the very beginning and honest peer review has been tossed aside.

Do you have actual sources for this, or did you just pull it out of your nether regions, like normal.
 
Oh, you were just whining.
So that is what you call voicing your opinion about my post. Good to know you think you whine.
 
This article is by the author of the study that showed that the Earth was supposedly cooling:

I'm sure it's clear by now that I accept the views of the National Academy, National Climate Assessment, Mann, and the huge majority of his fellow climatologists. Nevertheless, websites devoted to denying the existence of human-caused climate change – or at least promoting the idea that nothing should be done about it – continue to use my article to validate their thinking. In fact the article has reportedly become the most-cited article in Newsweek's history.

This is what the left really craves - doing something about it. Global warming makes a very nice pretext for higher taxes, more regulation, so-called "smart growth" etc. all things that the left wants to do anyway.
 
Everything that righties accuse others of doing, they do or enable themselves. Every single thing.

Such as:

So that is what you call voicing your opinion about my post. Good to know you think you whine.
 
Back
Top Bottom