South Korea …86% fully vaxxed…currently having their biggest infection spike.
![]()
South Korea COVID - Coronavirus Statistics - Worldometer
South Korea Coronavirus update with statistics and graphs: total and new cases, deaths per day, mortality and recovery rates, current active cases, recoveries, trends and timeline.www.worldometers.info
There is no evidence that lockdowns were effective at preventing infection spikes…none.
All the “source it” bullshit just goes to show you are completely unaware that there are many side effects to these vaxxes. If a vaccine makes you Ill, for instance with a fever, you are at greater risk of contracting another illness. This is not rocket science.
Btw, check out the adverse reactions and the quantity of them…millions upon millions.
The “vaccines” cause adverse reactions in vast numbers of people inoculated with them …within 2 weeks of the shot a huge percentage of people are susceptible to infection.
During those 2 weeks they are not counted as jabbed.
I can’t make it any simpler for you.
There is no evidence that lockdowns were effective at preventing infection spikes…none.
All the “source it” bullshit just goes to show you are completely unaware that there are many side effects to these vaxxes. If a vaccine makes you Ill, for instance with a fever, you are at greater risk of contracting another illness. This is not rocket science.
Btw, check out the adverse reactions and the quantity of them…millions upon millions.
It may be your plan but it is not my plan.All of that is part of the plan.
It is not my plan or your plan... it is the plan.It may be your plan but it is not my plan.
I am pro active.
Irrelevant to the point.I have gotten all my vaccinations including the small pox vaccination. I do my part to keep my family, myself , and my community healthy.
You have no proof lockdowns prevented infections…just admit it. I guess it can make some people feel a bit dumb when they have bought into a silly idea…but they usually get over it with time and some thinking on the subject…good luck.Read better. Is this a possibility for you or should I just accept you've missed this boat?
You have no proof lockdowns prevented infections…just admit it. I guess it can make some people feel a bit dumb when they have bought into a silly idea…but they usually get over it with time and some thinking on the subject…good luck.
![]()
Lockdowns only reduced COVID deaths by 0.2 per cent, Johns Hopkins study finds
'We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality'nationalpost.com
Lol…the fact that you think biased “sources” prove anything says much about you…the real world proves you are wrong lol. Countries with full lockdowns still got big infection spikes.Yes, that's right. You've demonstrated you barely understand the written word...and you expect me to 'take your word' on medical science and data? I called you out to prove your statements and you cave like a house of cards.
Severe adverse reactions? Sources?![]()
You have no proof….you’re stuck in 2020 lol.Proof presented time and again.
You ignored.
They spiked in countries with a lot of old , fat , diabetic people with heart disease , low vit D levels and dementia …99% of people were never at serious risk from Covid, only 1 in 440 people have died of it over a 2 year period in the U.K…most of us are as safe as Asians.OK.
How about hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths?
Are those "spiked" too?
"Biased sources" says the bloke who likes to cite the Daily Septic dealing in lies and quackery, and hard-right Daily Fail equally notorious for printing sensationalist lies and fabrication. Mate, you crack me upLol…the fact that you think biased “sources” prove anything says much about you…the real world proves you are wrong lol. Countries with full lockdowns still got big infection spikes.
![]()
New study suggests Covid infections were falling before lockdown
When lockdown was first imposed, there was little science to base it on. The virus was assumed to be growing at an exponential rate, with each infected person passing it on to about four others. The controversial assumption: only mandatory lockdown could stop this. Graphs were drawn, showing the...www.spectator.co.uk
Some of us are not gullible enough to think the Guardian , BBC , manufacturers of the “vaccines” and the politicians who pushed them and mandates are a reliable source of truth concerning this pretty weak “pandemic”…which was only called such by changing the definition of what constitutes a pandemic."Biased sources" says the bloke who likes to cite the Daily Septic and hard-right Daily Fail. Mate, you crack me up![]()
No but you're gullible enough to accept, without question, what a far-right source tells you to believe; and you have the neck to accuse others of bias! Hilarious. Go buy the Beano; it's more your level.Some of us are not gullible enough to think the Guardian , BBC , manufacturers of the “vaccines” and the politicians who pushed them and mandates are a reliable source of truth concerning this pretty weak “pandemic”…which was only called such by changing the definition of what constitutes a pandemic.
No but you're gullible enough to accept, without question, what a far-right source tells you to believe; and you have the neck to accuse others of bias! Hilarious. Go buy the Beano; it's more your level.
PolitiFact | Daily Mail
PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.www.politifact.com
You have no proof….you’re stuck in 2020 lol.
It’s all over the Internet …Source? 'Jamie White'?
You have nothing to show lockdowns worked…nothing . Btw , it’s 2022 now lol.Either ignorance or a lie.
I vote BigEye lied as evidence of the efficay of lockdowns was presented in 2021.
You have nothing to show lockdowns worked…nothing . Btw , it’s 2022 now lol.
…so you have nothing…..You again lie.
Why do you lie about all things COVID?