It's a cult. I knew I was right!

[KLATTU]

Some time ago , I noticed that in several discussion board where I was involved, the warmists all started calling skeptics deniers. It was eerie, as if it happened overnight. I suspected someti8ng was up. Like maybe marching orders went out from Real climate to the cult members: " In every discussion forum, use the word denier, skeptic sounds way too reasonable". OR something like tha. I was too lazy to look that up though.

Until the other day.
Yep I was basically right.
Deniers are not Skeptics - CSI

LAFFRIOT.

Needless to say- this kind of crap doesn't happen in real science, only climate science.

 

[MrT]

Some time ago , I noticed that in several discussion board where I was involved, the warmists all started calling skeptics deniers. It was eerie, as if it happened overnight. I suspected someti8ng was up. Like maybe marching orders went out from Real climate to the cult members: " In every discussion forum, use the word denier, skeptic sounds way too reasonable". OR something like tha. I was too lazy to look that up though.

Until the other day.
Yep I was basically right.
Deniers are not Skeptics - CSI

LAFFRIOT.

Needless to say- this kind of crap doesn't happen in real science, only climate science.

Holy ****! We've been discovered! Quick - everyone hide!

 

[OrphanSlug]

Ok... so the "Committee for Skeptical Inquiry" and those they speak to do not want to be called "deniers" along side other "deniers," despite the best efforts of "alarmists" and those in the media reporting on this, but rather they want to be called "skeptics" as that is what their organization claims to stand for.

Well there is a ****ing surprise!

(And we wonder why this issue became sank the moment politics entered the picture.)

 

[Grand Mal]

Some time ago , I noticed that in several discussion board where I was involved, the warmists all started calling skeptics deniers. It was eerie, as if it happened overnight. I suspected someti8ng was up. Like maybe marching orders went out from Real climate to the cult members: " In every discussion forum, use the word denier, skeptic sounds way too reasonable". OR something like tha. I was too lazy to look that up though.

Until the other day.
Yep I was basically right.
Deniers are not Skeptics - CSI

LAFFRIOT.

Needless to say- this kind of crap doesn't happen in real science, only climate science.

Yeah, it happens elsewhere. There's still people who deny evolution.

 

[Grand Mal]

Ok... so the "Committee for Skeptical Inquiry" and those they speak to do not want to be called "deniers" along side other "deniers," despite the best efforts of "alarmists" and those in the media reporting on this, but rather they want to be called "skeptics" as that is what their organization claims to stand for.

Well there is a ****ing surprise!

(And we wonder why this issue became sank the moment politics entered the picture.)

A quote from the article...
"Real skepticism is summed up by a quote popularized by Carl Sagan, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Inhofe’s belief that global warming is “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people” is an extraordinary claim indeed. He has never been able to provide evidence for this vast alleged conspiracy. That alone should disqualify him from using the title “skeptic.”

I don't blame them for wanting to disassociate themselves from climate-change deniers.

 

[shrubnose]

Some time ago , I noticed that in several discussion board where I was involved, the warmists all started calling skeptics deniers. It was eerie, as if it happened overnight. I suspected someti8ng was up. Like maybe marching orders went out from Real climate to the cult members: " In every discussion forum, use the word denier, skeptic sounds way too reasonable". OR something like tha. I was too lazy to look that up though.

Until the other day.
Yep I was basically right.
Deniers are not Skeptics - CSI

LAFFRIOT.

Needless to say-

this kind of crap doesn't happen in real science, only climate science.

What's more real than getting your house blown away by a hurricane and going home to find only the foundation?

Fill us in.

 

[joG]

Some time ago , I noticed that in several discussion board where I was involved, the warmists all started calling skeptics deniers. It was eerie, as if it happened overnight. I suspected someti8ng was up. Like maybe marching orders went out from Real climate to the cult members: " In every discussion forum, use the word denier, skeptic sounds way too reasonable". OR something like tha. I was too lazy to look that up though.

Until the other day.
Yep I was basically right.
Deniers are not Skeptics - CSI

LAFFRIOT.

Needless to say- this kind of crap doesn't happen in real science, only climate science.

That observation will earn you not only friends.

 

[Casper]

Some time ago , I noticed that in several discussion board where I was involved, the warmists all started calling skeptics deniers. It was eerie, as if it happened overnight. I suspected someti8ng was up. Like maybe marching orders went out from Real climate to the cult members: " In every discussion forum, use the word denier, skeptic sounds way too reasonable". OR something like tha. I was too lazy to look that up though.

Until the other day.
Yep I was basically right.
Deniers are not Skeptics - CSI

LAFFRIOT.

Needless to say- this kind of crap doesn't happen in real science, only climate science.

Yes, it does happen in real science, or you have never taken part in a Discussion on Evolution.

 

[ocean515]

Some time ago , I noticed that in several discussion board where I was involved, the warmists all started calling skeptics deniers. It was eerie, as if it happened overnight. I suspected someti8ng was up. Like maybe marching orders went out from Real climate to the cult members: " In every discussion forum, use the word denier, skeptic sounds way too reasonable". OR something like tha. I was too lazy to look that up though.

Until the other day.
Yep I was basically right.
Deniers are not Skeptics - CSI

LAFFRIOT.

Needless to say- this kind of crap doesn't happen in real science, only climate science.

In the year that preceeded President Obama's election victory, I noticed a similar trend. Labels would suddenly appear designed to impugn or otherwise denigrate groups of people who were viewed as opposition. I too wondered how these labels suddenly arrived out of nowhere.

At first, it was revealed there was such as thing as "talking points" that went out overnight to the various "clearing houses" of political ideology. Digging into it, that is when I discovered the vastness of the Progressive Machine. From a central source of finance, multiple sources spread out and created websites, and think tanks. They all communicated with each other, and their incestuous relationships became evident.

Glenn Beck, think him a kook or not, inspired me to check into this spider web myself. I was astonished to discover it was all true. From George Soros, the Democracy Alliance, Media Matters, AFL-CIO, Ford Foundation, Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, Salon, Annennburg Foundation, and on and on. All the way into the Climate Change area, and even the World Economic Forum.

Words like "denier", or "racist" are all commanded by on high. Even Black Lives Matters is a creation of this same inter-connected effort.

It's brazen, remarkably impressive, and extremely dangerous.

Climate Change is little more than a global social justice agenda, the real purpose of the Socialist Progressive movement. Calling people "deniers" is just an attempt to dismiss skeptics, and attract the gullible too sensitive and vulnerable to the threat of being called a name, and are desperate to be part of a group.

 

[longview]

What's more real than getting your house blown away by a hurricane and going home to find only the foundation?

Fill us in.

Can you cite an example of a House blown away by a hurricane, that would not have happened
if the CO2 levels were lower?

 

[VanceMack]

What's more real than getting your house blown away by a hurricane and going home to find only the foundation?

Fill us in.

Life in the 1800s must have sucked for you!

You get that despite all the gloom and doom over an increase of severe storm activity there has in fact been a DECREASE (which was, ironically...ALSO pointed to as 'proof' of AGW). Right?

 

[KLATTU]

In the year that preceeded President Obama's election victory, I noticed a similar trend. Labels would suddenly appear designed to impugn or otherwise denigrate groups of people who were viewed as opposition. I too wondered how these labels suddenly arrived out of nowhere. p.

There was also this. The term Government spending disappeared. It was either 'investment' or 'stimulus'.

Oh and remember journolist? Where it was exposed how many journalists from the wtachdog press ( smirk) were simply DNC operatives with bylines. ?

Remember, journalists didn't have to call it investment just becuase Democrat politicians did, But they sure did ,din't they?

 

[shrubnose]

Can you cite an example of a House blown away by a hurricane, that would not have happened
if the CO2 levels were lower?

No. But about 60-years ago I saw it rain on one side of the road while the other side stayed dry!

What do you think about that?

:lol:

 

[KLATTU]

No. But about 60-years ago I saw it rain on one side of the road while the other side stayed dry!

What do you think about that?

:lol:

EXACTLY the kind of extreme weather which was predicted!

 

[eohrnberger]

Yeah, it happens elsewhere. There's still people who deny evolution.

Putting climate change on the same level as evolution I think is an overstatement and an over estimation of the 'science' behind climate change.

 

[eohrnberger]

There was also this. The term Government spending disappeared. It was either 'investment' or 'stimulus'.

Oh and remember journolist? Where it was exposed how many journalists from the wtachdog press ( smirk) were simply DNC operatives with bylines. ?

Remember, journalists didn't have to call it investment just becuase Democrat politicians did, But they sure did ,din't they?

Yeah, I recall journolist.

Yet another example of left end of the political spectrum 'group think', and yet another example of the complicit media being complicit in the pushig of the progressive agenda.

 

[shrubnose]

Putting climate change on the same level as evolution I think is an overstatement

and an over estimation of the 'science' behind climate change.

Come back in a hundred years and we'll have a chat about that.

:lol:

 

[Kobie]

In the year that preceeded President Obama's election victory, I noticed a similar trend. Labels would suddenly appear designed to impugn or otherwise denigrate groups of people who were viewed as opposition. I too wondered how these labels suddenly arrived out of nowhere.

At first, it was revealed there was such as thing as "talking points" that went out overnight to the various "clearing houses" of political ideology. Digging into it, that is when I discovered the vastness of the Progressive Machine. From a central source of finance, multiple sources spread out and created websites, and think tanks. They all communicated with each other, and their incestuous relationships became evident.

Glenn Beck, think him a kook or not, inspired me to check into this spider web myself. I was astonished to discover it was all true. From George Soros, the Democracy Alliance, Media Matters, AFL-CIO, Ford Foundation, Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, Salon, Annennburg Foundation, and on and on. All the way into the Climate Change area, and even the World Economic Forum.

Words like "denier", or "racist" are all commanded by on high. Even Black Lives Matters is a creation of this same inter-connected effort.

It's brazen, remarkably impressive, and extremely dangerous.

Climate Change is little more than a global social justice agenda, the real purpose of the Socialist Progressive movement. Calling people "deniers" is just an attempt to dismiss skeptics, and attract the gullible too sensitive and vulnerable to the threat of being called a name, and are desperate to be part of a group.

There was also this. The term Government spending disappeared. It was either 'investment' or 'stimulus'.

Oh and remember journolist? Where it was exposed how many journalists from the wtachdog press ( smirk) were simply DNC operatives with bylines. ?

Remember, journalists didn't have to call it investment just becuase Democrat politicians did, But they sure did ,din't they?

You people live in a fantasy world.

I remember first hearing the word "stimulus," referring to a large infusion of government capital, in 1989. And shockingly enough, the "Journolist" nontroversy -- outrage ginned up by conservative partisan media -- rears its head.

Debunking the Journolist "Conspiracy" - CBS News

 

[eohrnberger]

Come back in a hundred years and we'll have a chat about that.

:lol:

As faulty as Gore's prediction of the ice caps melting and inundating low lying seaside urban areas (wasn't that supposed to happen last year?), so shall the rest of the AGW / nightmare cult predict the future.

Not even remotely as fully demonstrated as the theory of evolution.

 

[jmotivator]

A quote from the article...
"Real skepticism is summed up by a quote popularized by Carl Sagan, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Inhofe’s belief that global warming is “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people” is an extraordinary claim indeed. He has never been able to provide evidence for this vast alleged conspiracy. That alone should disqualify him from using the title “skeptic.”

I don't blame them for wanting to disassociate themselves from climate-change deniers.

Point to someone who denies that climate changes.

 

[KLATTU]

Yo

Debunking the Journolist "Conspiracy" - CBS News

LOL . I love when liberal journalists ' debunk' theories about liberal journalists.

Reminds of those other great debunkings:


" Hillar's email- nothing to see here" -EJ Dionne
" why Climategate was not a scandal" -by Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt

"Oj simpson ,not guilty" - by OJ simpson

 

[jmotivator]

There was also this. The term Government spending disappeared. It was either 'investment' or 'stimulus'.

Oh and remember journolist? Where it was exposed how many journalists from the wtachdog press ( smirk) were simply DNC operatives with bylines. ?

Remember, journalists didn't have to call it investment just because Democrat politicians did, But they sure did ,din't they?

We still see that today with the recent expose on the Clinton campaign dictating articles almost verbatim to "journalists" (local politico laughingly calls them "typists") for "exclusives".

 

[Mr Person]

A "cult".

Well, I suppose that's why the same group of people are always citing the same set of self-referential and generally debunked sources to claim that AGW theory is some big conspiracy perpetrated by scientists bent on world domination (or wealth redistribution or whatever the incoherent motivation is supposed to be)....

 

[Grand Mal]

Point to someone who denies that climate changes.

Cut it out. You know what we're talking about here, why play word games?

 

[Kobie]

LOL . I love when liberal journalists ' debunk' theories about liberal journalists.

Reminds of those other great debunkings:


" Hillar's email- nothing to see here" -EJ Dionne
" why Climategate was not a scandal" -by Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt

"Oj simpson ,not guilty" - by OJ simpson

Gotta admit, the conservative press that tells you what to think sure built a nice racket with "Journolist." Any debunking of the Daily Caller's idiotic lies you consume like oxygen is just confirmation of the conspiracy.