Did you watch the youtube video by the latest mass shooter who is still on the loose in Brooklyn?I suppose the point is to be very firm against mass shootings, but (I believe that) rhetoric after a highly emotional event doesn't usually end up getting the job started, and it surely doesn't get the job done. If you want to argue about the gun control aspect of this, this isn't the thread for that. Remind me if I forget. Or if it goes that way, a moderator could move this thread.
Did you watch the youtube video by the latest mass shooter who is still on the loose in Brooklyn?
How do you propose to stop people from becoming as full of anger, hatred and the urge for annihilation as he is?
You want to know if rhetoric is effective or not?
What is the topic?
You should watch it.No, I'm listening to Democracy Now! discussing it.
Progressive principles. The US Green Party platform would be a good start.
I don't see any "her" mentioned in the OP? Are you talking about Amy Goodman from a show mentioned in a later post? What rhetoric, the three words in the thread title? Not sure that counts as rhetoric much or what its effect is supposed to be?Her rhetoric and its ultimate effectiveness?
We've been given the plan for that time and again for the past 15 years. The key is to get rid of white people, especially Christian, heterosexual males.Did you watch the youtube video by the latest mass shooter who is still on the loose in Brooklyn?
How do you propose to stop people from becoming as full of anger, hatred and the urge for annihilation as he is?
Who is her? Hochul?Her rhetoric and its ultimate effectiveness?
Some of us have no clue what you are talking about.I suppose the point is to be very firm against mass shootings, but (I believe that) rhetoric after a highly emotional event doesn't usually end up getting the job started, and it surely doesn't get the job done. If you want to argue about the gun control aspect of this, this isn't the thread for that. Remind me if I forget. Or if it goes that way, a moderator could move this thread.
New York governor Hochul sounded as if she took one too many valium before making her rant. Never try a Come to Jesus speech when you don't believe in Jesus. It was hollow. Tinny. Out of place. She spoke to no one.I don't see any "her" mentioned in the OP? Are you talking about Amy Goodman from a show mentioned in a later post? What rhetoric, the three words in the thread title? Not sure that counts as rhetoric much or what its effect is supposed to be?
Both, not one or the other. There's a lot of work to be done.Talk is cheap...the ONLY way to stop violence is to change people's hearts...no gun control, no amount of laws punishing the criminal, can do that...
It's not going to end now. We'll see more radicalized black extremists/nationalist attacks. Go find the NYC (alleged) attacker's social media postings. He is radicalized by all things from Farrakhan to BLM and everything in between.I suppose the point is to be very firm against mass shootings, but (I believe that) rhetoric after a highly emotional event doesn't usually end up getting the job started, and it surely doesn't get the job done. If you want to argue about the gun control aspect of this, this isn't the thread for that. Remind me if I forget. Or if it goes that way, a moderator could move this thread.
With no offense, changing people's hearts would leave a lot of violence happening, and both gun control and law enforcement can save a lot of lives.Talk is cheap...the ONLY way to stop violence is to change people's hearts...no gun control, no amount of laws punishing the criminal, can do that...
And the reason for that, apparently, is endemic white supremacy stemming from a nation that was founded based on the intent to enslave people of color. The only way we can fix the problem is to get rid of white people.It's not going to end now. We'll see more radicalized black extremists/nationalist attacks. Go find the NYC (alleged) attacker's social media postings. He is radicalized by all things from Farrakhan to BLM and everything in between.
Most people are non-violent most of the time, violence is an outlier. Until we start treating violent people for the underlying mental illness, nothing will change.Talk is cheap...the ONLY way to stop violence is to change people's hearts...no gun control, no amount of laws punishing the criminal, can do that...
I don't think it hurts but actions speak louder than words. That's all the depth I have for this.Her rhetoric and its ultimate effectiveness?
I only watched the first half, til he warned the second vid was going to be graphic. Is that where the Farrakhan and BLM stuff was? Tell me what he said except rave about gay social workers and his own self hate?It's not going to end now. We'll see more radicalized black extremists/nationalist attacks. Go find the NYC (alleged) attacker's social media postings. He is radicalized by all things from Farrakhan to BLM and everything in between.
Whut?I suppose the point is to be very firm against mass shootings, but (I believe that) rhetoric after a highly emotional event doesn't usually end up getting the job started, and it surely doesn't get the job done. If you want to argue about the gun control aspect of this, this isn't the thread for that. Remind me if I forget. Or if it goes that way, a moderator could move this thread.
We've been given the plan for that time and again for the past 15 years. The key is to get rid of white people, especially Christian, heterosexual males.
And the reason for that, apparently, is endemic white supremacy stemming from a nation that was founded based on the intent to enslave people of color. The only way we can fix the problem is to get rid of white people.
Correct.It's not going to end now. We'll see more radicalized black extremists/nationalist attacks. Go find the NYC (alleged) attacker's social media postings. He is radicalized by all things from Farrakhan to BLM and everything in between.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?