What was posted by donsutherland1 is a Israeli LIE.
What do you think?
I'm not surprised.A thread was posted by by donsutherland1 , about an article pretending that the number of palestinians killed by Israeli army in Gaza on Dec. 27 stood at about 500, with about 125 of them civilians.
Reading the article we found the following:
Israeli troops approach Gaza population centers
By IBRAHIM BARZAK and STEVE WEIZMAN – 5 days ago
and the numbers mentioned previousley.
But looking for the article in AP site give nothing. Instead I found the following article:
Jan 8, 5:36 PM EST
UN: 257 Palestinian children killed in Gaza
By IBRAHIM BARZAK and KARIN LAUB
Associated Press Writer
Well... info are contradictories.
And looking into the UN web site we find:
PRESS CONFERENCE BY UNDER-SECRETARY-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS, DIRECTOR OF GAZA OPERATIONS FOR UN RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY FOR PALESTINE REFUGEES
Here we find what was written in Ap web site:
Turning to broader issues in the humanitarian efforts in Gaza, he said the local Ministry of Health was reporting a total of 758 fatalities since the start of hostilities. About 34 per cent, or 257, of those killed were children and 7.5 per cent, or 56, were women. There was a total of 3,100 injured people, of whom 1,080 were children and 452 women.
Conclusion:
What was posted by donsutherland1 is a Israeli LIE.
What do you think?
Of coarse its a lie!As I responded to your post in the thread in question and explained that AP and Google have a partnership, the issue has already been addressed. The post can be found at: http://www.debatepolitics.com/middl...za-operation-fatalities-9.html#post1057880605
First, the Associated Press story was disseminated through Google News at: The Associated Press: Israeli troops approach Gaza population centers
Second, Google and AP have a partnership in which Google pays AP to disseminate some of AP's content via Google News. An piece that mentions the partnership can be found at in the American Journalism Review at To Partner or not to Partner? *|*American Journalism Review
In sum, the AP story is not an "Israeli lie."
The last time I looked, children were considered civilians. Your article said the UN said only 100 were killed. The AP said the UN said 257 were killed. That's 157 more than your article. So, your article lied.Your article:
More than 500 Palestinians have been killed, including more than 100 civilians, according to United Nations figures.
AP article:
As many as 257 children have been killed and 1,080 wounded - about a third of the total casualties since Dec. 27, according to U.N. figures released Thursday.
Of coarse its a lie!
How do you explain the contradiction?
The last time I looked, children were considered civilians. Your article said the UN said only 100 were killed. The AP said the UN said 257 were killed. That's 157 more than your article. So, your article lied.
Why do you think it didn't?
Alright, I see your point.Have you checked the dates of the two AP articles? The one I cited was from January 6 (5 days ago). The one Alex33 mentioned was published on January 8. New information and additional casualties from fighting over the two days between the pieces probably explains the differences.
Billo, one more time slowlyAlright, I see your point.
Now why did you kill 157 children in 2 days?
Alright, I see your point.
Now why did you kill 157 children in 2 days?
Good point.
But in fact, they are liars. Because as I had posted above the UN web site confirms the number of 257 Palestinian children killed (pay attention please, 257 CHILDREN) and 56 women (WOMEN). So the number is not 125 civilians (CIVILIANS).
"Israel’s lie machine is working flat out"
(pay attention please, 257 CHILDREN)
What you had posted has nothing to do with the actual thread. Unless, you try to justify Israeli war crimes!!!
Save Israel, BOMB PALESTINE!
Save Israel, BOMB PALESTINE!
Save Palestine, bomb Israel ...
Moderator's Warning: |
If AP is in error, that is not the fault of donsutherland1. He cited a legitimate news source.That's right. That showes how media are manipulated By Israel. Anyways, I notified AP about the article.
If AP is in error, that is not the fault of donsutherland1. He cited a legitimate news source.
You owe him a public apology. So does Billo.
One last point. With the amount of negative publicity about Israel in the press, you sound like an idiot claiming that Israel manipulates the media.
I don't apologize when I have nothing to apologize for.If AP is in error, that is not the fault of donsutherland1. He cited a legitimate news source.
You owe him a public apology. So does Billo.
One last point. With the amount of negative publicity about Israel in the press, you sound like an idiot claiming that Israel manipulates the media.
If AP is in error, that is not the fault of donsutherland1. He cited a legitimate news source.
You owe him a public apology. So does Billo.
One last point. With the amount of negative publicity about Israel in the press, you sound like an idiot claiming that Israel manipulates the media.
Here's another way of looking at this...
If you are going to say that the "collective punishment" Israel is doing in Gaza is 100% the fault of Hamas because they'e the ones who fired the rockets, then it's perfectly okay to hold someone responsible for the articles they use to prove their point.
That showes how media are manipulated By Israel.
.
Precisely.The confusion seems to have arisen because I posted an AP piece written on 1/6 while the member expressing his concern cited a 1/8 article that contained different figures. As noted previously, additional combat, more details, etc., over the two days were probably behind the differing numbers.
Precisely.
The OP author totally ignores the time differential between 1/6 and 1/8. Not only that, but he infers ("Israel lies") that Israel manipulated the numbers even though both articles stipulate that the numbers were supplied by the UN.
Talk about sleazy.
Don is not Israeli. Don is not Jewish either. The OP is nothing more than an erroneous and disingenuous attempt to slander.Actually he says "Israeli lie". He does not extend his claim to Israel as a country, but limits it to Don.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?