• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Isn't the shooter simply honoring Charlie Kirk's legacy?

Some people should not have guns.

This left wing nut job was one of them.
 
Wait, you brought it up and now you admit you are oblivious. ???

What mindset are you talking about? Do you even know what point you were trying to make?
I brought up the fact that those on the right are seeking retaliation upon those who don't give a **** about a hateful individual who was assassinated by way of his own rhetoric. I'm furthermore oblivious as to why the slavish right worship him to the degree they do.

Any more stupid questions?
 
I brought up the fact that those on the right are seeking retaliation upon those who don't give a **** about a hateful individual who was assassinated by way of his own rhetoric. I'm furthermore oblivious as to why the slavish right worship him to the degree they do.

Any more stupid questions?
What fact and what retribution/retaliation. ? You made the claim but had zero evidence of this retaliation and what form it’s supposed to take place.

Please show us all what the heck you are talking about.
 
What fact and what retribution/retaliation. ? You made the claim but had zero evidence of this retaliation and what form it’s supposed to take place.

Please show us all what the heck you are talking about.
Old news. Look it up.
Rescue a local dog if you desire a game of fetch.
 
Old news. Look it up.
Rescue a local dog if you desire a game of fetch.
In the future if you aren’t capable of remembering any of your posts our what they pertain to?
Don’t post on a debate forum.
Have a nice day.
 
In the future if you aren’t capable of remembering any of your posts our what they pertain to?
Don’t post on a debate forum.
Have a nice day.
The next time you decide to troll, don't. It's not your strong suite.
 
The next time you decide to troll, don't. It's not your strong suit.
By trolling you mean asking you to explain your posts and defend your position.
N. B. That’s not trolling that’s called debating . It’s what this website is for.

Have a nice day.
 
By trolling you mean asking you to explain your posts and defend your position.
N. B. That’s not trolling that’s called debating . It’s what this website is for.

Have a nice day.

Asserting a challenge - in this case - that the right didn't retaliate against such individuals or perhaps the retaliations were justified - are example of challenges to a debate.
In contrast, badgering questions (sea-lioning) with apparent answers....is cowardly obfuscation i.e. trolling.
 
Asserting a challenge - in this case - that the right didn't retaliate against such individuals or perhaps the retaliations were justified - are example of challenges to a debate.
In contrast, badgering questions (sea-lioning) with apparent answers....is cowardly obfuscation i.e. trolling.
Yeah. No one here knows what the heck you are talking about when you say “ that the right didn’t retaliate against such individuals or perhaps retaliations were justified “

That’s not a challenge to debate that’s just gobbledygook.

It makes no sense. No one here seems to understand what conversation in your head you seem to be having .


I asked you some simple questions to get at wtf you are saying and you threw and continue to throw a hissy.
 
Yeah. No one here knows what the heck you are talking about when you say “ that the right didn’t retaliate against such individuals or perhaps retaliations were justified “

That’s not a challenge to debate that’s just gobbledygook.

It makes no sense. No one here seems to understand what conversation in your head you seem to be having .


I asked you some simple questions to get at wtf you are saying and you threw and continue to throw a hissy.
It's common knowledge that those who openly mocked or otherwise didn't give a shit about Kirk getting shot, got retaliated against by those on the right.

What part of this has you so utterly confused?
 
It's common knowledge that those who openly mocked or otherwise didn't give a shit about Kirk getting shot, got retaliated against by those on the right.

What part of this has you so utterly confused?

What was the retaliation? They got called assholes?
 
It's common knowledge that those who openly mocked or otherwise didn't give a shit about Kirk getting shot, got retaliated against by those on the right.

What part of this has you so utterly confused?
I don’t believe it is “ common knowledge”.
What retaliation are you talking about.

If it’s common knowledge , then you should be able to show us what you are talking about.
 
I don’t believe it is “ common knowledge”.
What retaliation are you talking about.

If it’s common knowledge , then you should be able to show us what you are talking about.
It's not my job nor interest in mending your ignorance.
 
Back
Top Bottom